Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
>> built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
>> Policy prevents me from adding this to the bina
* Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 07:48]:
| Hi Jörgen,
|
| > Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
| > Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
|
| Just try "dchroot sid" on one of these machines :-)
| Hint: copy your package to /home/chroots/sid/home/ first.
nope that isn'
On 2004-03-10 Jörgen Hägg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
> (L
I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
after my first attempt I realized
that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
(Like bruckner: "woody Debian GNU/Linux (+chroots)")
Hi Jörgen,
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
Just try "dchroot sid" on one of these machines :-)
Hint: copy your package to /home/chroots/sid/home/ first.
--jochen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:04:42AM +0100, Jörgen Hägg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures,
Why? Is the package so different during packing on different archs?
> but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, no
I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
after my first attempt I realized
that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
(Like bruckner: "woody Debian GNU/Linux (+chroots)")
--
To UNSUB
Save Money, Buy GENERIC!
Prescription drugs with NO prior prescription needed!
- XANAX - (to treat anxiety)
- PHENTERMINE - (for weight loss)
- Viagra - (got wood?)
- Ambian - (For a Great Nights Sleep)
- Lipitor - (to reduce cholesterol)
- NEXIUM - (to treat acid reflux and GERD)
- PAXIL
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:55:21PM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
> with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
> need to set up a new MySQL database (I vaguely know I could use
> wwwconfig, but n
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
> built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
> Policy prevents me from adding this to the binary debs, but my
> understanding of policy is tha
Hello Brian!
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:26:57AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please tell me if there is anything else you want me to check / fix.
>
> Well, some of your debhelper stuff could use updating. See
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
Save Money, Buy GENERIC!
Prescription drugs with NO prior prescription needed!
- XANAX - (to treat anxiety)
- PHENTERMINE - (for weight loss)
- Viagra - (got wood?)
- Ambian - (For a Great Nights Sleep)
- Lipitor - (to reduce cholesterol)
- NEXIUM - (to treat acid reflux and GERD)
- PAXIL
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:55:21PM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
> with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
> need to set up a new MySQL database (I vaguely know I could use
> wwwconfig, but n
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 12:25, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
> > > builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
> > > Ok, nevermind. Than
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
> built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
> Policy prevents me from adding this to the binary debs, but my
> understanding of policy is tha
Hello Brian!
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:26:57AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please tell me if there is anything else you want me to check / fix.
>
> Well, some of your debhelper stuff could use updating. See
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and
> MySQL, over Apache.
>
> In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
> with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I w
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
> > builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
> > Ok, nevermind. Thanks for reading it ;)
> You should give us a little bit more time. May
Mesure prise :
La pièce jointe du message a été supprimée et remplacée par un fichier texte
informant le destinataire de l'action entreprise.
De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À :
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Date :
302114944,29623811
Objet :
Re: My details
Détail des documents jo
Hi all,
I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and
MySQL, over Apache.
In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
need to set up a new MySQL database (I vaguely know I c
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 12:25, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
> > > builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
> > > Ok, nevermind. Than
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> * The patch that changes 0's to NULL's is pointless. In C++, NULL is
>> just "#define NULL 0".
>
> Definitely true. I preferred QA's patch over upstream's patch since
> for me 'NULL' jus
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and
> MySQL, over Apache.
>
> In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
> with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I w
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
> > builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
> > Ok, nevermind. Thanks for reading it ;)
> You should give us a little bit more time. May
Mesure prise :
La pièce jointe du message a été supprimée et remplacée par un fichier texte
informant le destinataire de l'action entreprise.
De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date :
302114944,29623811
Objet :
Re: My details
Détail des documen
Hi all,
I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and
MySQL, over Apache.
In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
need to set up a new MySQL database (I vaguely know I c
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> * The patch that changes 0's to NULL's is pointless. In C++, NULL is
>> just "#define NULL 0".
>
> Definitely true. I preferred QA's patch over upstream's patch since
> for me 'NULL' jus
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:21:05PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Maybe you could try reimplementing (some) of that as a shell script
> using dd. That way, you'd cut down on the packaging overhead. Also,
> if
> there's more stuff like that, it might eventually be worth
> considering
> having a pac
On 2004-03-09 Luca Pasquali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> and now a strange, dumb-sounding request:
> if you mentors have better/more useful "packaging exercises" to
> suggest me, I'll welcome the advices, it may be a strange request but
> I'm not a programmer, I mainly use console to do netwo
Hi.
I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
Policy prevents me from adding this to the binary debs, but my
understanding of policy is that I can keep it in the orig.tar.gz for the
sake of using an unchange
Luca Pasquali wrote:
[... about truncate...]
Maybe you could try reimplementing (some) of that as a shell script
using dd. That way, you'd cut down on the packaging overhead. Also, if
there's more stuff like that, it might eventually be worth considering
having a package for the whole bunch.
> I'
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:46:21PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't
> do
> anything that dd doesn't.
I've packaged it with newbies in mind, and on the fly resizing,
situation in which redudnancy of dd features could be excused.
> I
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:21:05PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Maybe you could try reimplementing (some) of that as a shell script
> using dd. That way, you'd cut down on the packaging overhead. Also,
> if
> there's more stuff like that, it might eventually be worth
> considering
> having a pac
On 2004-03-09 Luca Pasquali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> and now a strange, dumb-sounding request:
> if you mentors have better/more useful "packaging exercises" to
> suggest me, I'll welcome the advices, it may be a strange request but
> I'm not a programmer, I mainly use console to do netwo
Hi.
I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
Policy prevents me from adding this to the binary debs, but my
understanding of policy is that I can keep it in the orig.tar.gz for the
sake of using an unchange
Luca Pasquali wrote:
[... about truncate...]
Maybe you could try reimplementing (some) of that as a shell script
using dd. That way, you'd cut down on the packaging overhead. Also, if
there's more stuff like that, it might eventually be worth considering
having a package for the whole bunch.
> I'
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:46:21PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't
> do
> anything that dd doesn't.
I've packaged it with newbies in mind, and on the fly resizing,
situation in which redudnancy of dd features could be excused.
> I
Hello Brian!
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I can sponsor you I guess, but I don't have a PPP link on which to test
> it. I'd have to take your word on it that it works.
That's great, thanks a lot.
Well, the package relies on pon / poff to work properly, so wher
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:27:39PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> What strikes me as odd is why people think they will get any kind of
> scholarship (which seems to be the objective) with such a mail.
It's like spam. They send an e-mail to anything that vaguely resembles an
e-mail address within
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:09:05 +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Not if you read the man page:
> dd if=/dev/null of=totruncate bs=1 seek=positiontotruncate
Oh! You are right, this works. But unfortunatly this behavior is not
explained clearly in my manpage :-( Only a flag "notrunc" is mentioned:
Hello Brian!
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I can sponsor you I guess, but I don't have a PPP link on which to test
> it. I'd have to take your word on it that it works.
That's great, thanks a lot.
Well, the package relies on pon / poff to work properly, so wher
Michael Mayer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 22:46:21 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't do
>> anything that dd doesn't.
>
>Oh, yes, it is worth it! In fact, some month ago I wrote a tool like this
>for my perso
Am Mo, den 08.03.2004 schrieb Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo um 19:14:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > I will be very thankful if someone of you kindly upload this package.
> > It's related with #215783.
> Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:27:39PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> What strikes me as odd is why people think they will get any kind of
> scholarship (which seems to be the objective) with such a mail.
It's like spam. They send an e-mail to anything that vaguely resembles an
e-mail address within
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 22:46:21 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't do
> anything that dd doesn't.
Oh, yes, it is worth it! In fact, some month ago I wrote a tool like this
for my personal use to cut movie files which are slightly to
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:45:20PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:01PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > although I've read the policy again, I am not sure whether it is allowed
> > to store scripts in /usr/share/$package? In particular, scripts that are
> > only meant
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:09:05 +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Not if you read the man page:
> dd if=/dev/null of=totruncate bs=1 seek=positiontotruncate
Oh! You are right, this works. But unfortunatly this behavior is not
explained clearly in my manpage :-( Only a flag "notrunc" is mentioned:
Michael Mayer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 22:46:21 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't do
>> anything that dd doesn't.
>
>Oh, yes, it is worth it! In fact, some month ago I wrote a tool like this
>for my perso
Am Mo, den 08.03.2004 schrieb Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo um 19:14:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > I will be very thankful if someone of you kindly upload this package.
> > It's related with #215783.
> Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:15:54AM +0100, Luca Pasquali wrote:
> author put it under GPL, new debs are here:
>
> http://ketavet.dyndns.org/truncate
Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't do
anything that dd doesn't.
If I've misunderstood and this does more, could yo
50 matches
Mail list logo
