RFS: mimms - MMS (mms://) streaming media download utility

Hi folks, I'm looking for a sponsor for the mimms package. This upload would close ITP bug #221806. MiMMS is a fork of the "mmsclient" streaming media download utility originally from ... this utility is very handy at saving mms:// streams (usually from .as

RFS: mimms - MMS (mms://) streaming media download utility

Hi folks, I'm looking for a sponsor for the mimms package. This upload would close ITP bug #221806. MiMMS is a fork of the "mmsclient" streaming media download utility originally from ... this utility is very handy at saving mms:// streams (usually from .as

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 23:34]: > [Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you > can only use the Mail-Followup-To header] yes, i read -mentors. > Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you > debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you can only use the Mail-Followup-To header] Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs rocks!). But I have some general com

Re: RFS: evolvotron (graphics)

Hi, Frank! Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that there is one advantage of pbuilder: When you compile in a > pbuilder environment, you know that there are no packages installed > beside the base ones installed by debbootstrap and build-essential. So > you know when you make it insta

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 23:34]: > [Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you > can only use the Mail-Followup-To header] yes, i read -mentors. > Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you > debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you can only use the Mail-Followup-To header] Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs rocks!). But I have some general com

Re: RFS: evolvotron (graphics)

Hi, Frank! Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that there is one advantage of pbuilder: When you compile in a > pbuilder environment, you know that there are no packages installed > beside the base ones installed by debbootstrap and build-essential. So > you know when you make it insta

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:11:04PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > > You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k` > > Or you can sign them after building with debsign ut

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:09:17PM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote: > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > Do you know that you can have a ~/.devscripts config file with a > DEBSIGN_KEYID=... option? Take a look at the /etc/dev

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

Hi Bartosz, > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k` > Or you can sign them after building with debsign utility. That's what i usually do, as well. I build everything

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

* GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-07 20:43:13 +0100]: > Hi Jochen, > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:29:32PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks pretty good in general. > Thanks for checking. > > > However, a few nits to pick... > > > > - please convert your files in

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:43:13PM +0100, GCS wrote: > > However, a few nits to pick... > > > > - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian > > policy requires this. > Done. I just wonder if there's a way for automatic signing the packages > after build, as now I ge

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

Hi Jochen, On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:29:32PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks pretty good in general. Thanks for checking. > However, a few nits to pick... > > - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian > policy requires this. Done. I

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 19:32]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > posted to debian-mentors: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x > > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc > > >

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > posted to debian-mentors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc > > dpkg-source: error:

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

Hi > * Package name : xmms-blursk > Version : 1.3 Looks pretty good in general. However, a few nits to pick... - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian policy requires this. - please add either "DH_COMPAT=4" to your rules or execute "echo 4 > debian/compat", c

RFS: netPanzer

Hello everyone. I'm looking for sponsor for my package(s) netpanzer. It consists with two packages: netpanzer and netpanzer-data. Here goes relevant information: * Package name: netpanzer Version : 0.1.5 Upstream Authors: Matthias Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:11:04PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > > You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k` > > Or you can sign them after building with debsign ut

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:09:17PM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote: > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > Do you know that you can have a ~/.devscripts config file with a > DEBSIGN_KEYID=... option? Take a look at the /etc/dev

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

Hi Bartosz, > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k` > Or you can sign them after building with debsign utility. That's what i usually do, as well. I build everything

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

* GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-07 20:43:13 +0100]: > Hi Jochen, > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:29:32PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks pretty good in general. > Thanks for checking. > > > However, a few nits to pick... > > > > - please convert your files in the

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:43:13PM +0100, GCS wrote: > > However, a few nits to pick... > > > > - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian > > policy requires this. > Done. I just wonder if there's a way for automatic signing the packages > after build, as now I ge

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

Hi Jochen, On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:29:32PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks pretty good in general. Thanks for checking. > However, a few nits to pick... > > - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian > policy requires this. Done. I

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 19:32]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > posted to debian-mentors: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x > > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc > > >

Re: RFS: Bootsplash

Matthew A. Nicholson schrieb: > I am still looking for a sponsor for my bootsplash package set. I am still looking for a remedy for the following error: root:/home/eike# export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer; dpkg -i bootsplash_3.0.7-7_i386.deb bootsplash-theme-linux_3.0.0-3_i386.deb Selecting previousl

RFS: xmms-blursk

Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for xmms-blursk, which is a powerful visualization plugin for XMMS. It is lintian and linda clean (I had to update config.guess and config.sub, otherwise linda complained: W: The file config.[guess|log] contains a timestamp line that is less than 2002). P

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > posted to debian-mentors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc > > dpkg-source: error:

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

Hi > * Package name : xmms-blursk > Version : 1.3 Looks pretty good in general. However, a few nits to pick... - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian policy requires this. - please add either "DH_COMPAT=4" to your rules or execute "echo 4 > debian/compat", c

RFS: netPanzer

Hello everyone. I'm looking for sponsor for my package(s) netpanzer. It consists with two packages: netpanzer and netpanzer-data. Here goes relevant information: * Package name: netpanzer Version : 0.1.5 Upstream Authors: Matthias Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: RFS: evolvotron (graphics)

Tim Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > - I have enough semi-obsolete spare machines here to turn one over to > unstable (looks a bit easier to get to grips with than pbuilder). Note that there is one advantage of pbuilder: When you compile in a pbuilder environment, you know that there are no pac

Re: RFS: evolvotron (graphics)

Thanks to all for the tips and pointers. - Turns out there is a -k option for dh_installchangelogs which makes CHANGES a symlink to changelog, which seems sensible enough. - I have enough semi-obsolete spare machines here to turn one over to unstable (looks a bit easier to get to grips with than

Re: RFS: Bootsplash

Matthew A. Nicholson schrieb: > I am still looking for a sponsor for my bootsplash package set. I am still looking for a remedy for the following error: root:/home/eike# export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer; dpkg -i bootsplash_3.0.7-7_i386.deb bootsplash-theme-linux_3.0.0-3_i386.deb Selecting previousl

Re: How to access cvs.debian.org with ssh/rsa keys?

Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-03-06 Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/tetex login > [...] > > Yes cvs pserver is using with plaintext authentication, if you were > using ssh it would read :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/tetex (ex

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to r

RFS: xmms-blursk

Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for xmms-blursk, which is a powerful visualization plugin for XMMS. It is lintian and linda clean (I had to update config.guess and config.sub, otherwise linda complained: W: The file config.[guess|log] contains a timestamp line that is less than 2002). P

Re: RFS: evolvotron (graphics)

Tim Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > - I have enough semi-obsolete spare machines here to turn one over to > unstable (looks a bit easier to get to grips with than pbuilder). Note that there is one advantage of pbuilder: When you compile in a pbuilder environment, you know that there are no pac

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to debian-mentors: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc > dpkg-source: error: file jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306.orig.tar.gz has size > 757760 instead of expected

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and > >> to provide seamless upgrades

Re: RFS: evolvotron (graphics)

Thanks to all for the tips and pointers. - Turns out there is a -k option for dh_installchangelogs which makes CHANGES a symlink to changelog, which seems sensible enough. - I have enough semi-obsolete spare machines here to turn one over to unstable (looks a bit easier to get to grips with than

Re: How to access cvs.debian.org with ssh/rsa keys?

Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-03-06 Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/tetex login > [...] > > Yes cvs pserver is using with plaintext authentication, if you were > using ssh it would read :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/tetex (ex

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i am not sure if i understand the java policy correctly and if > the result is as intended. I attribute that to my missing > knowledge of java terminology. > > if people (the developers of the software) r

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to r

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and >> to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep >> depending on pcregrep, however rep

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to debian-mentors: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc > dpkg-source: error: file jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306.orig.tar.gz has size 757760 > instead of expected

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and > >> to provide seamless upgrades

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and > to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep > depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives me a headache. > > Package: pcregrep

Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

Hello, I know this is a standard szenario, but the natural solution conflicts with suggestions in policy. When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives m

Re: checkout my first java package, please!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i am not sure if i understand the java policy correctly and if > the result is as intended. I attribute that to my missing > knowledge of java terminology. > > if people (the developers of the software) r

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and >> to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep >> depending on pcregrep, however rep

Re: Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and > to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep > depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives me a headache. > > Package: pcregrep

Renaming a package, proper values for replaces/conflicts?

Hello, I know this is a standard szenario, but the natural solution conflicts with suggestions in policy. When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives m