test

2004-01-26 Thread team
Ñš([Š½. åæùhp4YÍt¥¿FdCSÎ mN'•›³ÃïWñߘÐN/‰h“Ç©¢l×1Ž™HØ­V<ž?ù&¾ˆáeÄ”#æÍFPó?êt(†MOj³ñΟ?–3Îó…*qçÍí3t'ÀvË.„ŒR(æ_FϯҒŸæF2:>"LM ½ËP‰?“Ì~—Ö~û;ô0®\¿×%“Ž£—פ‰·.S¹pù?]†Gäom†ÂÇ9U?!"íƒíÈ|×› ‰Ñ“¹×6°,ÕU¿èej6ÔXæ ËÒMV¹yÓ‡µÉ?‰F5æ÷‰ûsë>ª¶‘1é,¬'xÂÕ#×þ³ßQÓ×ì½¹]éÚBT!(?¬ ¸aÔ«}ŽÚ ’~¼ö‘øK÷;Qò?ªUúñ“ÉILÞÝÈ}úiðÛn|GmÀVB­

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > "Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > This error means that his version is _newer_ than the one > > lintian expects. So this is a lintian bug. > > But 3.6.0 is not the most recent standard version anyway, > > it's 3.6.

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > "Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > This error means that his version is _newer_ than the one > > lintian expects. So this is a lintian bug. > > But 3.6.0 is not the most recent standard version anyway, > > it's 3.6.

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > > I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not > give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the > changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > > I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not > give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the > changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Frank Küster
"Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Filippo Giunchedi schrieb: >>> W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > >> yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la >> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz ) > > This error means that h

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Frank Küster
"Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Filippo Giunchedi schrieb: >>> W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > >> yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la >> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz ) > > This error means that h

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Eike \"zyro\" Sauer
Filippo Giunchedi schrieb: >> W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la > /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz ) This error means that his version is _newer_ than the one lintian expects. So this i

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Eike \"zyro\" Sauer
Filippo Giunchedi schrieb: >> W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la > /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz ) This error means that his version is _newer_ than the one lintian expects. So this i

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:13:22PM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: > I put a new version of hatari online: >deb http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main >deb-src http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main > > Now there is a manpage included and a menu entry. > But lintian still gives the

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:13:22PM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: > I put a new version of hatari online: >deb http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main >deb-src http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main > > Now there is a manpage included and a menu entry. > But lintian still gives the

Re: Delayed upload doesn't work (nor SSH to ftp-master)

2004-01-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > Delayed uploading by ftp doesn't seem to work (missing directory) > and ftp-master doesn't let me in with SSH/SCP (altough "master", for > example, does). > Is this still an intentional restriction due to the server > compromise or/a

Delayed upload doesn't work (nor SSH to ftp-master)

2004-01-26 Thread Jarno Elonen
Hi, Delayed uploading by ftp doesn't seem to work (missing directory) and ftp-master doesn't let me in with SSH/SCP (altough "master", for example, does). Is this still an intentional restriction due to the server compromise or/and am I doing something wrong? - Jarno

Re: Delayed upload doesn't work (nor SSH to ftp-master)

2004-01-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > Delayed uploading by ftp doesn't seem to work (missing directory) > and ftp-master doesn't let me in with SSH/SCP (altough "master", for > example, does). > Is this still an intentional restriction due to the server > compromise or/a

Delayed upload doesn't work (nor SSH to ftp-master)

2004-01-26 Thread Jarno Elonen
Hi, Delayed uploading by ftp doesn't seem to work (missing directory) and ftp-master doesn't let me in with SSH/SCP (altough "master", for example, does). Is this still an intentional restriction due to the server compromise or/and am I doing something wrong? - Jarno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-26 Thread Alexander Bürger
Hi again, > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 into debain/control. >

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-26 Thread Alexander Bürger
Hi again, > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 into debain/control. >

Re: Failed ITP?

2004-01-26 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Nico Manicone wrote: > Hello, > > thank You for your answer. > > > You should retitle the existing RFP > > Now go and retitle the existing one > > Can i do this by sending a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the > subject "Bug#107407: ITP: twhttpd S

Re: Failed ITP?

2004-01-26 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Nico Manicone wrote: > Hello, > > thank You for your answer. > > > You should retitle the existing RFP > > Now go and retitle the existing one > > Can i do this by sending a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the > subject "Bug#107407: ITP: twhttpd S