Re: RFS: fig2sxd

Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8 > (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of > course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files, > including .dsc etc. are available at sourcefo

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8 > (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of > course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files, > including .dsc etc. are available at sourcefo

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

Hi, > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > No. > > What I forgot here: > > Fix this: I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8 (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files, incl

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

Hi, > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > No. > > What I forgot here: > > Fix this: I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8 (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files, incl

Re: Failed ITP?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Nico Manicone wrote: > Hello, > > thank You for your answer. > > >You should retitle the existing RFP > >Now go and retitle the existing one > > Can i do this by sending a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the > subject "Bug#107407: ITP: twhttpd Sam

Re: Failed ITP?

Hello, thank You for your answer. You should retitle the existing RFP Now go and retitle the existing one Can i do this by sending a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the subject "Bug#107407: ITP: twhttpd Sam Ng's small http forwarder for gateways and firewalls"? Regards, Nico Manicon

Re: Failed ITP?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Nico Manicone wrote: > Hello, > > thank You for your answer. > > >You should retitle the existing RFP > >Now go and retitle the existing one > > Can i do this by sending a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the > subject "Bug#107407: ITP: twhttpd Sam

Re: Failed ITP?

Nico Manicone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but nothing happend. > 1. Please close bug 107407 > 2. Enter 227958 in packages worked on > This was my first try for an ITP. It would be nice if someone could tell > what i made wrong. You filed a new bug, thats wron

Re: Failed ITP?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:43:19PM +0100, Nico Manicone wrote: > A new Bug (227958) in the wnpp-metapackage was created, but the program > does not appear in the list for packages worked on. And the old entry at > requested packages (Bug 107407) still exist. BTS LDAP is down so those lists aren't

Failed ITP?

Hello, i tried to file an ITP for the program TWHTTPD. As far as i can see i failed to achieve this. A new Bug (227958) in the wnpp-metapackage was created, but the program does not appear in the list for packages worked on. And the old entry at requested packages (Bug 107407) still exist. I

Re: Failed ITP?

Hello, thank You for your answer. You should retitle the existing RFP Now go and retitle the existing one Can i do this by sending a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the subject "Bug#107407: ITP: twhttpd Sam Ng's small http forwarder for gateways and firewalls"? Regards, Nico Manicone. --

Re: RFS: hatari

I put a new version of hatari online: deb http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main deb-src http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main Now there is a manpage included and a menu entry. But lintian still gives the following warnings: W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 W:

Re: I need a sponsor for a debian package

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:17:13PM -0300, Sergio Cayuqueo wrote: > > Hello I am Sergio from argentina ... > I don' have a good english sorry me :( > > I need a sponsor for a debian Package I am the maintainer of this > > http://www.lunix.com.ar/Downloads/BIF/paquetes/Debian/ Index of /Do

Re: Failed ITP?

Nico Manicone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but nothing happend. > 1. Please close bug 107407 > 2. Enter 227958 in packages worked on > This was my first try for an ITP. It would be nice if someone could tell > what i made wrong. You filed a new bug, thats wron

Re: Failed ITP?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:43:19PM +0100, Nico Manicone wrote: > A new Bug (227958) in the wnpp-metapackage was created, but the program > does not appear in the list for packages worked on. And the old entry at > requested packages (Bug 107407) still exist. BTS LDAP is down so those lists aren't

Failed ITP?

Hello, i tried to file an ITP for the program TWHTTPD. As far as i can see i failed to achieve this. A new Bug (227958) in the wnpp-metapackage was created, but the program does not appear in the list for packages worked on. And the old entry at requested packages (Bug 107407) still exist. I sen

Re: RFS: hatari

I put a new version of hatari online: deb http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main deb-src http://mherrn.de/debian/hatari/ unstable main Now there is a manpage included and a menu entry. But lintian still gives the following warnings: W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 W:

Re: I need a sponsor for a debian package

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:17:13PM -0300, Sergio Cayuqueo wrote: > > Hello I am Sergio from argentina ... > I don' have a good english sorry me :( > > I need a sponsor for a debian Package I am the maintainer of this > > http://www.lunix.com.ar/Downloads/BIF/paquetes/Debian/ Index of /Do

I need a sponsor for a debian package

Hello I am Sergio from argentina ... I don' have a good english sorry me :( I need a sponsor for a debian Package I am the maintainer of this http://www.lunix.com.ar/Downloads/BIF/paquetes/Debian/ Good Bye !!!

Re: SPF (Sender Permitted From) libaries and tools

Meinhard Schneider wrote: > - PySPF (Python implementation of SPF) Please consider doing similar things as other python packages. (Maybe consult python-policy draft in some python package.) Cheers T. -- Thomas Viehmann, pgpFifhOzJte3.pgp Description: PGP signature

SPF (Sender Permitted From) libaries and tools

Hi, I build Debian packages for SPF (Sender Permitted From, http://spf.pobox.com). The packages contain: - Mail::SPF::Query (perl implementation, also reference implementation of SPF) - Mail::SRS (perl implementation of the 'Sender Rewriting Scheme') - PySPF (Python implementation of SPF)

I need a sponsor for a debian package

Hello I am Sergio from argentina ... I don' have a good english sorry me :( I need a sponsor for a debian Package I am the maintainer of this http://www.lunix.com.ar/Downloads/BIF/paquetes/Debian/ Good Bye !!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: SPF (Sender Permitted From) libaries and tools

Meinhard Schneider wrote: > - PySPF (Python implementation of SPF) Please consider doing similar things as other python packages. (Maybe consult python-policy draft in some python package.) Cheers T. -- Thomas Viehmann, pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

SPF (Sender Permitted From) libaries and tools

Hi, I build Debian packages for SPF (Sender Permitted From, http://spf.pobox.com). The packages contain: - Mail::SPF::Query (perl implementation, also reference implementation of SPF) - Mail::SRS (perl implementation of the 'Sender Rewriting Scheme') - PySPF (Python implementation of SPF)

Re: RFS: hatari

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 02:20:47AM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged hatari, an Atari ST emulator and am searching for a > sponsor for it. [snip] > And, btw. I had some difficulties creating the package, mainly getting > the manpage into the package. I created the file debian/h

Re: RFS: hatari

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 02:20:47AM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged hatari, an Atari ST emulator and am searching for a > sponsor for it. [snip] > And, btw. I had some difficulties creating the package, mainly getting > the manpage into the package. I created the file debian/h

Re: RFS: hatari

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: > > > I thought so, too. But it doesn't work. It is enabled in debian/rules and > > > since the manpage is installed when listed in debian/hatari.manpages this > > > can't be the problem. I called the manpage hatari.1 and it lies in the

Re: RFS: hatari

> "Peggy Pultke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ^^ Well, sorry for that. I have some problems with the webinterface for this mailaddress... > > I thought so, too. But it doesn't work. It is enabled in debian/rules and > > since the manpage is installed when listed in debian/hatari.manpa

Re: RFS: hatari

"Peggy Pultke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought so, too. But it doesn't work. It is enabled in debian/rules and > since the manpage is installed when listed in debian/hatari.manpages this > can't be the problem. I called the manpage hatari.1 and it lies in the > debian directory, too. As far

Re: RFS: hatari

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: > > > I thought so, too. But it doesn't work. It is enabled in debian/rules and > > > since the manpage is installed when listed in debian/hatari.manpages this > > > can't be the problem. I called the manpage hatari.1 and it lies in the

Re: RFS: hatari

> "Peggy Pultke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ^^ Well, sorry for that. I have some problems with the webinterface for this mailaddress... > > I thought so, too. But it doesn't work. It is enabled in debian/rules and > > since the manpage is installed when listed in debian/hatari.manpa

Re: RFS: hatari

> Marco Herrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And, btw. I had some difficulties creating the package, mainly getting >> the manpage into the package. I created the file >> debian/hatari.manpages to get the actual manpage included, but as far >> as I know this shouldn't be necessary for only one man

Re: RFS: hatari

"Peggy Pultke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought so, too. But it doesn't work. It is enabled in debian/rules and > since the manpage is installed when listed in debian/hatari.manpages this > can't be the problem. I called the manpage hatari.1 and it lies in the > debian directory, too. As far

Re: RFS: hatari

Marco Herrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, btw. I had some difficulties creating the package, mainly getting > the manpage into the package. I created the file debian/hatari.manpages > to get the actual manpage included, but as far as I know this shouldn't be > necessary for only one manpage. C

Re: RFS: hatari

> Marco Herrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And, btw. I had some difficulties creating the package, mainly getting >> the manpage into the package. I created the file >> debian/hatari.manpages to get the actual manpage included, but as far >> as I know this shouldn't be necessary for only one man

Re: RFS: hatari

Marco Herrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, btw. I had some difficulties creating the package, mainly getting > the manpage into the package. I created the file debian/hatari.manpages > to get the actual manpage included, but as far as I know this shouldn't be > necessary for only one manpage. C