Re: Successfully built packages said to be "out of date on m68k"

2003-12-23 Thread Florent Rougon
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for > m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when it happens but the > changes file still needs to be signed before the package is uploaded. You guessed right, it seems: I looked in th

Re: Successfully built packages said to be "out of date on m68k"

2003-12-23 Thread Florent Rougon
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for > m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when it happens but the > changes file still needs to be signed before the package is uploaded. You guessed right, it seems: I looked in th

Re: Successfully built packages said to be "out of date on m68k"

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:59:53PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote: > which I don't understand since the m68k build log (as well as those for > all other architectures) looks OK : Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when

Successfully built packages said to be "out of date on m68k"

2003-12-23 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi, My packages python2.{1,2,3}-xmms are not entering testing although they have met (as far as I can see) all the required conditions for four days now. The reason invoked on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyxmms.html is : out of date on m68k: python2.1-xmms, python2.2-xmms, python2.3-xmms

Re: Successfully built packages said to be "out of date on m68k"

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:59:53PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote: > which I don't understand since the m68k build log (as well as those for > all other architectures) looks OK : Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when

Successfully built packages said to be "out of date on m68k"

2003-12-23 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi, My packages python2.{1,2,3}-xmms are not entering testing although they have met (as far as I can see) all the required conditions for four days now. The reason invoked on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyxmms.html is : out of date on m68k: python2.1-xmms, python2.2-xmms, python2.3-xmms

Re: strange bug query error

2003-12-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:29:12AM -0600, John Belmonte wrote: > The bug query http://bugs.debian.org/223539 has been returning an error > for a week now, causing my bug mining script to fail. Anyone know > what's going on? Please report problems like this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when you notice t

strange bug query error

2003-12-23 Thread John Belmonte
The bug query http://bugs.debian.org/223539 has been returning an error for a week now, causing my bug mining script to fail. Anyone know what's going on? -John -- http:// if ile.o g/

Re: strange bug query error

2003-12-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:29:12AM -0600, John Belmonte wrote: > The bug query http://bugs.debian.org/223539 has been returning an error > for a week now, causing my bug mining script to fail. Anyone know > what's going on? Please report problems like this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when you notice t

strange bug query error

2003-12-23 Thread John Belmonte
The bug query http://bugs.debian.org/223539 has been returning an error for a week now, causing my bug mining script to fail. Anyone know what's going on? -John -- http:// if ile.o g/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: RFS: updated netjuke package

2003-12-23 Thread Stefan Frank
Ok, i noticed for a RFS more information should be supplied, so here's the changelog documenting the modifications i applied to the original package. It also passes lintian linda without any warning. And yes i know, #192336 should not be closed like that. I'll fix it with my sponsor once i find o

Re: RFS: updated netjuke package

2003-12-23 Thread Stefan Frank
Ok, i noticed for a RFS more information should be supplied, so here's the changelog documenting the modifications i applied to the original package. It also passes lintian linda without any warning. And yes i know, #192336 should not be closed like that. I'll fix it with my sponsor once i find o

Re: RFS: otp and wsx2lop

2003-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:11:55AM +0100, giskard wrote: > > ciao > > > otp control file: > > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} > Description: One time pad (otp) implements the otp encryption algorithm. > In cryptography, a one-time pad is a system in which a secret key > generated randomly is us

Re: Gutenbrowser mentor

2003-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:57AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, mpotter wrote: > > > I've taken over Gutenbrowser, and rebuilt it with me as the packager. Can > > someone upload the .deb file for me? > > > Probably -- if you tell us where we can get it from. > > Please, people, if you po

Re: RFS: otp and wsx2lop

2003-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:11:55AM +0100, giskard wrote: > > ciao > > > otp control file: > > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} > Description: One time pad (otp) implements the otp encryption algorithm. > In cryptography, a one-time pad is a system in which a secret key > generated randomly is us

Re: Gutenbrowser mentor

2003-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:57AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, mpotter wrote: > > > I've taken over Gutenbrowser, and rebuilt it with me as the packager. Can > > someone upload the .deb file for me? > > > Probably -- if you tell us where we can get it from. > > Please, people, if you po

Re: RFS [2]: naim - a console, ncurses AIM, ICQ, and lily client

2003-12-23 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:49:22PM -0500, Greg Leffler wrote: > I have tried it on several different i386 machines and have not been > able to find any errors. > > Thanks in advance for your consideration. I can't upload your packages (yet) as i'm still awaiting DAMnation, but I can offer you som