Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Lucas Albers
Dude we have cars, don't reinvent the automobile. Grsecurity does this already. http://www.grsecurity.net and 10,000 times more stuff. Some sample kernel config options, so you can get a brief overview: http://www.cs.montana.edu/faq/grsec/ It specifically has tpe, and has been extensivelly vetted f

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Lucas Albers
Dude we have cars, don't reinvent the automobile. Grsecurity does this already. http://www.grsecurity.net and 10,000 times more stuff. Some sample kernel config options, so you can get a brief overview: http://www.cs.montana.edu/faq/grsec/ It specifically has tpe, and has been extensivelly vetted f

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:34:00PM -0500, David Z Maze wrote: > Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it a patch, or a module? I'd expect that most things come as one > or the other. It's purely a module, and can be built with the kernel headers installed. > > 2. Providing it in s

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread David Z Maze
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the recommended way to distribute a kernel module? > > I see the options as : > > 1. Making a kernel-patch which could be build with > kernel-package. Is it a patch, or a module? I'd expect that most things come as one or the othe

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-09 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:06:14PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > >Have you found a sponsor for this? > Unfortunately, no. I've given most of the packages a cursory look. I do have a few suggestions and may be willing to sponsor them. Packaging concerns: - In several locations throughout the de

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:34:00PM -0500, David Z Maze wrote: > Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it a patch, or a module? I'd expect that most things come as one > or the other. It's purely a module, and can be built with the kernel headers installed. > > 2. Providing it in s

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread David Z Maze
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the recommended way to distribute a kernel module? > > I see the options as : > > 1. Making a kernel-patch which could be build with > kernel-package. Is it a patch, or a module? I'd expect that most things come as one or the othe

Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Steve Kemp
What is the recommended way to distribute a kernel module? I see the options as : 1. Making a kernel-patch which could be build with kernel-package. 2. Providing it in source form and expecting the user to build it, like the nvidia module. 3. Building on my machine to p

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-09 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:06:14PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > >Have you found a sponsor for this? > Unfortunately, no. I've given most of the packages a cursory look. I do have a few suggestions and may be willing to sponsor them. Packaging concerns: - In several locations throughout the de

Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Steve Kemp
What is the recommended way to distribute a kernel module? I see the options as : 1. Making a kernel-patch which could be build with kernel-package. 2. Providing it in source form and expecting the user to build it, like the nvidia module. 3. Building on my machine to p

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-09 Thread Thomas Viehmann
>Have you found a sponsor for this? Unfortunately, no. Cheers T.

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-09 Thread Thomas Viehmann
>Have you found a sponsor for this? Unfortunately, no. Cheers T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]