Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Max Vozeler
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:22:36AM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > > What's not ready: > - README.Debian hasnt been updated to reflect the switch to module-assistant > - loop-aes-ciphers-source hasnt been converted to module-assistant Done in just uploaded loop-aes-source 1.7e-14 and loop-aes-ciph

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Max Vozeler
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:22:36AM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > > What's not ready: > - README.Debian hasnt been updated to reflect the switch to module-assistant > - loop-aes-ciphers-source hasnt been converted to module-assistant Done in just uploaded loop-aes-source 1.7e-14 and loop-aes-ciph

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Max Vozeler
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:12:12AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Max Vozeler wrote: > > > As for the util-linux incompatibility, a Replaces: is the first solution > > > that comes to mind.. > > > > Does that mean I could create a package, say loop-aes-utils, that > > Replace

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi Eduard, thanks for suggesting module-assistant, I read up on it and re-wrote debian/rules in loop-aes-source accordingly. This should address most of the issues, details below. The modass override files are included in loop-aes-utils 2.11z-5. What's not ready: - README.Debian hasnt been updat

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Max Vozeler
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:12:12AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Max Vozeler wrote: > > > As for the util-linux incompatibility, a Replaces: is the first solution > > > that comes to mind.. > > > > Does that mean I could create a package, say loop-aes-utils, that > > Replace

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi Eduard, thanks for suggesting module-assistant, I read up on it and re-wrote debian/rules in loop-aes-source accordingly. This should address most of the issues, details below. The modass override files are included in loop-aes-utils 2.11z-5. What's not ready: - README.Debian hasnt been updat

Moving a config file

2003-11-27 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all, I have to move a config file, and I am not sure of the best way of handling it, so I wanted to ask for opinions. The problem is that I am currently shipping an /etc/default/$package, which needs to now become /etc/$package.conf - it's not a shell script, but more of a hacked together c

Moving a config file

2003-11-27 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all, I have to move a config file, and I am not sure of the best way of handling it, so I wanted to ask for opinions. The problem is that I am currently shipping an /etc/default/$package, which needs to now become /etc/$package.conf - it's not a shell script, but more of a hacked together c

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Max Vozeler wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:56:58PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:54:39AM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > > > Additional ciphers (Blowfish, Twofish and Serpent) can be used if the > > > loop-aes-ciphers-source package is installed a

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Max Vozeler wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:56:58PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:54:39AM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > > > Additional ciphers (Blowfish, Twofish and Serpent) can be used if the > > > loop-aes-ciphers-source package is installed a

RFS: libogg-vorbis-header-perl

2003-11-27 Thread Amit Shah
Hi all, I've made some changes to the libogg-vorbis-header-perl package. Please check it again if you had earlier. It now doesn't remove the test.ogg.bak file present in upstream; rather there's a new rule in debian/rules which teaches dh_clean not to remove it. The script that used this file

RFS: libogg-vorbis-header-perl

2003-11-27 Thread Amit Shah
Hi all, I've made some changes to the libogg-vorbis-header-perl package. Please check it again if you had earlier. It now doesn't remove the test.ogg.bak file present in upstream; rather there's a new rule in debian/rules which teaches dh_clean not to remove it. The script that used this file

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Max Vozeler [Wed, Nov 26 2003, 12:31:16AM]: > > mv /usr/src/modules/loop-aes/debian/tmp/lib/modules/2.4.23 \ > > /usr/src/modules/loop-aes/debian/tmp/lib/modules/2.4.23-rc3 > > mv: cannot stat `/usr/src/modules/loop-aes/debian/tmp/lib/modules/2.4.23': > > No such file or directory >

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Max Vozeler [Wed, Nov 26 2003, 12:31:16AM]: > > mv /usr/src/modules/loop-aes/debian/tmp/lib/modules/2.4.23 \ > > /usr/src/modules/loop-aes/debian/tmp/lib/modules/2.4.23-rc3 > > mv: cannot stat `/usr/src/modules/loop-aes/debian/tmp/lib/modules/2.4.23': No such > > file or directory >

Re: executing scripts after receiving a fax

2003-11-27 Thread Wouter van Marle
Well that interface is fully taken care of through the new_fax function. Please have a look at the docs for exact workings. It normally calls a script called new_fax, check exact location in your source files (it is a compile time option) or go to the dir where mgetty resides, and then type "string

Re: executing scripts after receiving a fax

2003-11-27 Thread Wouter van Marle
Well that interface is fully taken care of through the new_fax function. Please have a look at the docs for exact workings. It normally calls a script called new_fax, check exact location in your source files (it is a compile time option) or go to the dir where mgetty resides, and then type "string