executing scripts after receiving a fax

2003-11-26 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, before the real start: This mail is sent to two mailing lists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the mgetty-mailinglist, debian-mentors a list for getting good ideas from within the Debian project; please send answers also to both lists (and there is no need to Cc me, as I'm subscribed to both lists). The

Re: Best Way to Fix Package Icon

2003-11-26 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:11:39AM -0500, Daniel E. Markle wrote: > I can then use the build scripts to copy it to the appropriate > directory. However, I need to get rid of the old icon file. What is > the best way to fix this? Modify the Makefile to not install it? Or is > it best to keep my

Best Way to Fix Package Icon

2003-11-26 Thread Daniel E. Markle
The package I am working on has an existing icon neatly installed by the upstream Makefile; the problem is it is a 48x48 png instead of a 32x32 xpm as Debian Policy requires. The Makefile automatically installs this png as: /usr/share/pixmaps/gmasqdialer-icon.png I have modified it to the right

executing scripts after receiving a fax

2003-11-26 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, before the real start: This mail is sent to two mailing lists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the mgetty-mailinglist, debian-mentors a list for getting good ideas from within the Debian project; please send answers also to both lists (and there is no need to Cc me, as I'm subscribed to both lists). The

Re: Best Way to Fix Package Icon

2003-11-26 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:11:39AM -0500, Daniel E. Markle wrote: > I can then use the build scripts to copy it to the appropriate > directory. However, I need to get rid of the old icon file. What is > the best way to fix this? Modify the Makefile to not install it? Or is > it best to keep my

Best Way to Fix Package Icon

2003-11-26 Thread Daniel E. Markle
The package I am working on has an existing icon neatly installed by the upstream Makefile; the problem is it is a 48x48 png instead of a 32x32 xpm as Debian Policy requires. The Makefile automatically installs this png as: /usr/share/pixmaps/gmasqdialer-icon.png I have modified it to the right

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Eduard Bloch [Tue, Nov 25 2003, 07:37:53AM]: > - source depends on utils, why? No other -source package works that way. > - document properly that your package does NOT build with kernel-headers > - binary-modules is hosed: PS: ... and you use old dh_make templates which silently

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Max Vozeler [Fri, Nov 21 2003, 05:54:39AM]: > * URL : http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net > * License : GPL > Description : AES-encryption loopback Linux kernel module Bugs: - source depends on utils, why? No other -source package works that way. - document p

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Eduard Bloch [Tue, Nov 25 2003, 07:37:53AM]: > - source depends on utils, why? No other -source package works that way. > - document properly that your package does NOT build with kernel-headers > - binary-modules is hosed: PS: ... and you use old dh_make templates which silently

Re: RFS: loop-aes (#111167)

2003-11-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Max Vozeler [Fri, Nov 21 2003, 05:54:39AM]: > * URL : http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net > * License : GPL > Description : AES-encryption loopback Linux kernel module Bugs: - source depends on utils, why? No other -source package works that way. - document p

Re: RFS: msmtp, wmnetload, wmwifi

2003-11-26 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:26, Jess Mahan wrote: > I made a lot of changes to my packages (Thanks BTW for all the helpfull > comments from everyone. > > Can you please check them out now, and see if I did it right this time? > > deb http://digitalssg.net/debian/ stable main non-US > deb-src h

Re: RFS: msmtp, wmnetload, wmwifi

2003-11-26 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:26, Jess Mahan wrote: > I made a lot of changes to my packages (Thanks BTW for all the helpfull > comments from everyone. > > Can you please check them out now, and see if I did it right this time? > > deb http://digitalssg.net/debian/ stable main non-US > deb-src h