John Lightsey wrote:
> If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
> feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
> The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
referenc
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:00:45AM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
> of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
>
> I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
> - but two different ones.
>
> linda tells me:
> W: kbirthday;
John Lightsey wrote:
> If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
> feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
> The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
referenc
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:00:45AM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
> of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
>
> I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
> - but two different ones.
>
> linda tells me:
> W: kbirthday;
Hello!
I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
- but two different ones.
linda tells me:
W: kbirthday; Contains shared libraries, but is not in
Section: libs or base.
Te
Hello!
I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
- but two different ones.
linda tells me:
W: kbirthday; Contains shared libraries, but is not in
Section: libs or base.
Te
This message has been processed by the Brightmail(tm) Anti-Virus Solution using
Symantec's Norton AntiVirus Technology.
ACF60C[1].bat was infected with the malicious virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and has
been deleted because the file cannot be cleaned.
For more information on anti-virus tips and tech
This message has been processed by the Brightmail(tm) Anti-Virus Solution using
Symantec's Norton AntiVirus Technology.
ACF60C[1].bat was infected with the malicious virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and has been
deleted because the file cannot be cleaned.
For more information on anti-virus tips and tech
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 05:40, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought jackstart was essentially equivalent to a generic wrapper
> > - both require RTcap-patched kernel. Which would mean the only
> > difference between 2 and 3 here is the use of jackstart vs. ge
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 05:40, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought jackstart was essentially equivalent to a generic wrapper
> > - both require RTcap-patched kernel. Which would mean the only
> > difference between 2 and 3 here is the use of jackstart vs. ge
somebody care to mentor me?
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
somebody care to mentor me?
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Anno Domini Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:48:37AM -0800, Joshua Kwan Dixit:
> Your reply appears to be all blank.
I'm just wondering why the reply in this ML is not on
the ML itself, but on the author of each mes
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> My message is: avoid surprises from find.
Got the message, thank you for the warning.
However I doubt that upstream will use names like config.guess
for anything other than files which can and should be regenerated
in build phase,
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Anno Domini Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:48:37AM -0800, Joshua Kwan Dixit:
> Your reply appears to be all blank.
I'm just wondering why the reply in this ML is not on
the ML itself, but on the author of each mes
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> My message is: avoid surprises from find.
Got the message, thank you for the warning.
However I doubt that upstream will use names like config.guess
for anything other than files which can and should be regenerated
in build phase,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> >> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> >> > Two things:
> >> > Does -name config.{log,s
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:27:27PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következõeket írta:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
| | | - find . -name
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> >> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> >> > Two things:
> >> > Does -name config.{log,s
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
>> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
>> > Two things:
>> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
>> > do for me:
>> []
>> >
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
> Thank you. Is i
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:27:27PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következõeket írta:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
| | | - find . -name
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
[quoting]
or [1]
find ... -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
cu andreas
[1] This is a lot f
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> >
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
>
> Thank you.
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
>> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
>> > Two things:
>> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
>> > do for me:
>> []
>> >
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
> Thank you. Is i
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
[quoting]
or [1]
find ... -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
cu andreas
[1] This is a lot f
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> >
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
>
> Thank you.
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következőeket írta:
> Two things:
> Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> do for me:
[]
>
> Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
Thank you. Is it okay now?
--- orig/debian/rules
+++ mod/debian/rules
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
cle
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következőeket írta:
> Two things:
> Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> do for me:
[]
>
> Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
Thank you. Is it okay now?
--- orig/debian/rules
+++ mod/debian/rules
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
cle
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
>Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
>architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
>less mature ports this can cause trouble.
>
>As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
>Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
>architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
>less mature ports this can cause trouble.
>
>As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them
32 matches
Mail list logo
