FUEL SAVER PRO
This revolutionary device Boosts Gas Mileage 27%+ by helping fuel burn better
using three patented processes from General Motors.
Take a test drive Today - http://www.zppi.org/?axel=49
PROVEN TECHNOLOGY
A certified U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) laboratory recently
c
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:37:25AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 09:41, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:42:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > > Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
> > >
> > > Only if you
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 09:41, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:42:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
> >
> > Only if you want me to bounce it to the maintainer of the package that
> > actually put t
FUEL SAVER PRO
This revolutionary device Boosts Gas Mileage 27%+ by helping fuel burn better using
three patented processes from General Motors.
Take a test drive Today - http://www.zppi.org/?axel=49
PROVEN TECHNOLOGY
A certified U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) laboratory recently co
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:37:25AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 09:41, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:42:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > > Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
> > >
> > > Only if you
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 09:41, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:42:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
> >
> > Only if you want me to bounce it to the maintainer of the package that
> > actually put t
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 02:03, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Geez, slow down! :P Today fastdep, tomorrow... the world?
:) Absolutely. Gotta change the world yesterday, in fact.
Although such a POV has been known to cause anxiety and
frustration ...
(this is debian-devel material; please followup there)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:46:39PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> To do so, I ned to know a little more about apt's guts than I do
> currently, I'm afraid, and I was hoping someone could point me to a good
> reference guide about how apt calls
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:42:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
>
> Only if you want me to bounce it to the maintainer of the package that
> actually put those lines there.
Be careful - he may think that's a valid way
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 02:03, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Geez, slow down! :P Today fastdep, tomorrow... the world?
:) Absolutely. Gotta change the world yesterday, in fact.
Although such a POV has been known to cause anxiety and
frustration ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
(this is debian-devel material; please followup there)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:46:39PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> To do so, I ned to know a little more about apt's guts than I do
> currently, I'm afraid, and I was hoping someone could point me to a good
> reference guide about how apt calls
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:42:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
>
> Only if you want me to bounce it to the maintainer of the package that
> actually put those lines there.
Be careful - he may think that's a valid way
Hello all,
This is not precisely on-topic for this list, as I am not looking to
package this stuff for debian (yet), but other lists seemed even less
appropriate. Sorry about that.
The reason I am writing is that a company I work for (all debian shop -
yay!) uses a package to ease administration
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:43:46PM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
[...]
> + find . -name config.{log,status,cache} |xargs rm -f
[...]
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/test> touch config.log
Hello all,
This is not precisely on-topic for this list, as I am not looking to
package this stuff for debian (yet), but other lists seemed even less
appropriate. Sorry about that.
The reason I am writing is that a company I work for (all debian shop -
yay!) uses a package to ease administration
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:43:46PM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
[...]
> + find . -name config.{log,status,cache} |xargs rm -f
[...]
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/test> touch config.log
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Zenaan Harkness a következőeket írta:
> Three questions:
> - why are these two files copied in?
Because they are needed for autoconf et al, and in some cases
the upstream version of them is not suitable to build the package on
your system. I had stumbled upon this right
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
No it didn't.
> Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
Only if you want me to bounce it to the maintainer of the package that
actually put those lines there.
--
see shy jo
signat
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Zenaan Harkness a következőeket írta:
> Three questions:
> - why are these two files copied in?
Because they are needed for autoconf et al, and in some cases
the upstream version of them is not suitable to build the package on
your system. I had stumbled upon this right
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
No it didn't.
> Should I email this to the debhelper script maintainer?
Only if you want me to bounce it to the maintainer of the package that
actually put those lines there.
--
see shy jo
signat
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
dh_make
> - why are these two files copied in?
There is *no* good reason for it.
That should help if there are newer version of the files available.
If that happens its IMO better
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
dh_make
> - why are these two files copied in?
There is *no* good reason for it.
That should help if there are newer version of the files available.
If that happens its IMO better
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
dh_make != debhelper.
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/sh
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
dh_make != debhelper.
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/sh
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:11:15PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> This still has the "lintian can't cope with newest (newer even than last
> time) policy" warning. But that's the opposite of the usual "shouldn't
> you fix this" type of lintian warning ... of course, one could consider
> patching l
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:44:53PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
[...]
> W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.1.0
[...]
> I sent an email to lintian-maint. So at this point, can I consider my
> package lintian-clean?
Imho yes.
cu andreas
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:11:15PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> This still has the "lintian can't cope with newest (newer even than last
> time) policy" warning. But that's the opposite of the usual "shouldn't
> you fix this" type of lintian warning ... of course, one could consider
> patching l
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:44:53PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
[...]
> W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.1.0
[...]
> I sent an email to lintian-maint. So at this point, can I consider my
> package lintian-clean?
Imho yes.
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> well "lintian is already the newest version", here's the full lintian
> text again:
> W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.1.0
> N:
> N: The source package refers to a `Standards-Version' which is newer
> than
> N: the highest one lintia
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> well "lintian is already the newest version", here's the full lintian
> text again:
> W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.1.0
> N:
> N: The source package refers to a `Standards-Version' which is newer
> than
> N: the highest one lintia
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A package.desktop file.
>
>
> apt-get source conglomerate
> cd conglomerate-0.7.6/data
> cat conglomerate.desktop
by the way... I've read something in order top create a new folder in
the menu Application, so that I
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:44:53PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I sent an email to lintian-maint. So at this point, can I consider my
> package lintian-clean? Surely you don't add a lintian-override just
> because lintian is not yet up to the current policy spec ??
Indeed. Relax, and ignore the
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:14:13PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> (Yes, I hadn't read that thread - thanks.) However, I'm still unsure
> whether these (I assume _yes_ at this point) confusion came from the
> fact that the upstream source does not have these files at all.
In that case dh_make is
Here goes round 3 ... found in the usual place, with the usual links to
the .deb, the directory containing all the build files, the parent
directory, etc.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~zenaan/zenaan/files/
This still has the "lintian can't cope with newest (newer even than last
time) policy" warn
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:01, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > $ lintian -i *changes
> > W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
>
> Note, 3.6.1.0 is the most current. Take a look at
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:42:12AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I can subscribe to the BTS traffic of a whole package through the
> PTS. Is it also possible to just monitor a single bug and be emailed
> when something changes?
Not yet. A patch has been posted and needs one of us to have time to
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Let me^Wus know if you find away to update the gnome menu without
> > a reload of the desktop.
>
> I just now modified the first deb so that it includes a .deskt
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A package.desktop file.
>
>
> apt-get source conglomerate
> cd conglomerate-0.7.6/data
> cat conglomerate.desktop
by the way... I've read something in order top create a new folder in
the menu Application, so that I
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:44:53PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I sent an email to lintian-maint. So at this point, can I consider my
> package lintian-clean? Surely you don't add a lintian-override just
> because lintian is not yet up to the current policy spec ??
Indeed. Relax, and ignore the
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:14:13PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> (Yes, I hadn't read that thread - thanks.) However, I'm still unsure
> whether these (I assume _yes_ at this point) confusion came from the
> fact that the upstream source does not have these files at all.
In that case dh_make is
Here goes round 3 ... found in the usual place, with the usual links to
the .deb, the directory containing all the build files, the parent
directory, etc.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~zenaan/zenaan/files/
This still has the "lintian can't cope with newest (newer even than last
time) policy" warn
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Let me^Wus know if you find away to update the gnome menu without
> a reload of the desktop.
I just now modified the first deb so that it includes a .desktop file.
When I dpkg -i it the gnome's menu is updated, without reloadi
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:01, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > $ lintian -i *changes
> > W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
>
> Note, 3.6.1.0 is the most current. Take a look at
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:42:12AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I can subscribe to the BTS traffic of a whole package through the
> PTS. Is it also possible to just monitor a single bug and be emailed
> when something changes?
Not yet. A patch has been posted and needs one of us to have time to
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:51:36AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
> packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
> menu.
>
> For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to the gnome menu
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Let me^Wus know if you find away to update the gnome menu without
> > a reload of the desktop.
>
> I just now modified the first deb so that it includes a .deskt
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:51:36AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
> packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
> menu.
>
> For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to the gnome menu
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Let me^Wus know if you find away to update the gnome menu without
> a reload of the desktop.
I just now modified the first deb so that it includes a .desktop file.
When I dpkg -i it the gnome's menu is updated, without reloadi
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:51:36 +0100
Ottavio Campana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
> packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
> menu.
>
> For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to th
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:06:12PM -0800, Jess Mahan wrote:
> I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
> need a mentor first.
Right now you need to have a sponsor to look over your packages then
upload them for you. After that this sponsor may well decide that
ha
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:51:36AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
> packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
> menu.
>
> For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to the gnome menu
I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
menu.
For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to the gnome menu,
without having to go through Debian menus -> Apps -> .. but I'd like to
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 18:36, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > - why are these two files copied in?
>
> Three days ago there was
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200311/msg00030.html
> with these lines:
>
> |
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 18:36, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
> >
> > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.su
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:51:36AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
> packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
> menu.
>
> For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to the gnome menu
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:51:36 +0100
Ottavio Campana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
> packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
> menu.
>
> For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to th
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:42:12AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I can subscribe to the BTS traffic of a whole package through the
> PTS. Is it also possible to just monitor a single bug and be emailed
> when something changes?
No, not yet.
You could subscribe to the package and filterr on X-De
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:25:28PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:58, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, whatever you do, you are to keep these files up-to-date.
> Even if the program I'm packaging doesn't use autotools
[...]
If your package does not use
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:06:12PM -0800, Jess Mahan wrote:
> I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
> need a mentor first.
Right now you need to have a sponsor to look over your packages then
upload them for you. After that this sponsor may well decide that
ha
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
>
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)
I'm developing some programs for my university. They're ready for being
packaged in debs and I have created an entry for them in the debian
menu.
For we use gnome 2 I'd like to add the programs to the gnome menu,
without having to go through Debian menus -> Apps -> .. but I'd like to
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 18:36, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > - why are these two files copied in?
>
> Three days ago there was
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200311/msg00030.html
> with these lines:
>
> | Or
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 18:36, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
> >
> > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.su
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:42:12AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I can subscribe to the BTS traffic of a whole package through the
> PTS. Is it also possible to just monitor a single bug and be emailed
> when something changes?
No, not yet.
You could subscribe to the package and filterr on X-De
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:25:28PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:58, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, whatever you do, you are to keep these files up-to-date.
> Even if the program I'm packaging doesn't use autotools
[...]
If your package does not use
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
>
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 05:12, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
> number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
> updated changelog file)?
I'm not a DD, but I believe maintaining a package for Debian also means that
67 matches
Mail list logo
