On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 05:12, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
> number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
> updated changelog file)?
I'm not a DD, but I believe maintaining a package for Debian also means that
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:58, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
> >
> > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> > en
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 12:14, Neil Spring wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2003, at 4:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
> >
> > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> > endif
> > if
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:58, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
> >
> > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> > en
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 12:14, Neil Spring wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2003, at 4:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
> >
> > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> > endif
> > if
Hi,
I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
need a mentor first.
Right now, there are only two packages that I would like to maintain:
- wmnetload
- msmtp
I have packaged these, and they are available via:
deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
deb-src http:/
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
>
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
> cp -f /u
Hi,
I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
need a mentor first.
Right now, there are only two packages that I would like to maintain:
- wmnetload
- msmtp
I have packaged these, and they are available via:
deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
deb-src http:/
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
>
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
> cp -f /u
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> $ lintian -i *changes
> W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
Note, 3.6.1.0 is the most current. Take a look at
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz for what
changed. For this kind of program probably
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 12:31, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~zenaan/zenaan/files/
>
> Sorry it's taken a month, but there in the end...
>
> Updated to new upstream release (which includes manpage I submitted
> upstream), fastdep-0.16.
>
> Get it while it's hot...
> Zenaan
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~zenaan/zenaan/files/
Sorry it's taken a month, but there in the end...
Updated to new upstream release (which includes manpage I submitted
upstream), fastdep-0.16.
Get it while it's hot...
Zenaan
(PS RFS while we're here...)
On Nov 5, 2003, at 4:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
endif
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
cp -f /u
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> $ lintian -i *changes
> W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
Note, 3.6.1.0 is the most current. Take a look at
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz for what
changed. For this kind of program probably
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 12:31, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~zenaan/zenaan/files/
>
> Sorry it's taken a month, but there in the end...
>
> Updated to new upstream release (which includes manpage I submitted
> upstream), fastdep-0.16.
>
> Get it while it's hot...
> Zenaan
I can subscribe to the BTS traffic of a whole package through the
PTS. Is it also possible to just monitor a single bug and be emailed
when something changes?
Thanks,
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud De
debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
endif
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
endif
Three q
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>There is just a minor gotcha, #194152, you'll have to redirect ucf's
>stdin to /dev/tty.
Unfortunately, that isn't right either. hinfo has a really ugly hack in
postinst to save a copy of stdin if it has a chance, and only use
/dev/tty if
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~zenaan/zenaan/files/
Sorry it's taken a month, but there in the end...
Updated to new upstream release (which includes manpage I submitted
upstream), fastdep-0.16.
Get it while it's hot...
Zenaan
(PS RFS while we're here...)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
It seems the debuild chain converts symbolic (documentation) links to
file copies. Should this be so? My reading of policy says it is up to
the maintainer. If this is good practice (as I (naively?) assume) how do
I get around this?
In my case:
the package has:
/usr/share/doc/fastdep/html/fastdep.
On Nov 5, 2003, at 4:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
endif
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
cp -f /usr/
I can subscribe to the BTS traffic of a whole package through the
PTS. Is it also possible to just monitor a single bug and be emailed
when something changes?
Thanks,
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud De
debhelper puts the following into the "clean" rule in debian/rules:
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
endif
ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
endif
Three q
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>There is just a minor gotcha, #194152, you'll have to redirect ucf's
>stdin to /dev/tty.
Unfortunately, that isn't right either. hinfo has a really ugly hack in
postinst to save a copy of stdin if it has a chance, and only use
/dev/tty if
If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
updated changelog file)?
tia
zen
It seems the debuild chain converts symbolic (documentation) links to
file copies. Should this be so? My reading of policy says it is up to
the maintainer. If this is good practice (as I (naively?) assume) how do
I get around this?
In my case:
the package has:
/usr/share/doc/fastdep/html/fastdep.
Hello Man,
I want to talk with you pls tell me about yourself I have found you on the
net and you are seeking a developer plz write me.
I am waiting.
Fahad./
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http:/
If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
updated changelog file)?
tia
zen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Man,
I want to talk with you pls tell me about yourself I have found you on the
net and you are seeking a developer plz write me.
I am waiting.
Fahad./
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://jo
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:36:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >> The problem with that is, as pointed out in the bug report, is that now
> >> both the debconf database and language.dat are under /var, where backups
> >> are rarely done on homeusers s
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:36:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
[...]
> > I would say that, even though this is a cop-out, it's a better solution
> > than what's in place for tetex today.
> Hm, so this is in contrast to what Colin and Andreas said, as fa
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> The problem with that is, as pointed out in the bug report, is that now
>> both the debconf database and language.dat are under /var, where backups
>> are rarely done on homeusers systems, and he wants it under
>> /etc.
>
> Er, if you're not backing u
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:01:35AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
> > Put the information from the debconf database into the file, but between
> > markers ### begin DEBCONF section for $package... ### end DEBCONF
> > section for
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:36:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >> The problem with that is, as pointed out in the bug report, is that now
> >> both the debconf database and language.dat are under /var, where backups
> >> are rarely done on homeusers s
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
> preferred way how to do this?
> The packages I have on my system (mostly woody, however)
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:36:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
[...]
> > I would say that, even though this is a cop-out, it's a better solution
> > than what's in place for tetex today.
> Hm, so this is in contrast to what Colin and Andreas said, as fa
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> The problem with that is, as pointed out in the bug report, is that now
>> both the debconf database and language.dat are under /var, where backups
>> are rarely done on homeusers systems, and he wants it under
>> /etc.
>
> Er, if you're not backing u
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:01:35AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
> > Put the information from the debconf database into the file, but between
> > markers ### begin DEBCONF section for $package... ### end DEBCONF
> > section for
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
> preferred way how to do this?
> The packages I have on my system (mostly woody, however)
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:33:03PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
> (BTW, I'm more annoyed by being asked by dpkg that conffiles where
> changed "by me or a script" that I didn't even know they existed)
[...]
Afaik this usually happens if a conffile moves from one package to
another.
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
>> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
>> preferred way how to do this?
>
> Pars
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
>> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
>> preferred way how to do this?
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:33:03PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
> (BTW, I'm more annoyed by being asked by dpkg that conffiles where
> changed "by me or a script" that I didn't even know they existed)
[...]
Afaik this usually happens if a conffile moves from one package to
another.
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
>> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
>> preferred way how to do this?
>
> Pars
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
>> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
>> preferred way how to do this?
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
> preferred way how to do this?
Have you read debconf-devel(7), namely the sectio
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
> preferred way how to do this?
Parse the file and only change the debconf-managed options
Hi,
if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
preferred way how to do this?
The packages I have on my system (mostly woody, however) don't care at
all about this and simply say "don't edit this fil
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
> preferred way how to do this?
Have you read debconf-devel(7), namely the sectio
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
> still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
> preferred way how to do this?
Parse the file and only change the debconf-managed options
Hi,
if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but
still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a
preferred way how to do this?
The packages I have on my system (mostly woody, however) don't care at
all about this and simply say "don't edit this fil
> I assume that a former revision of Andrea's package dynamiclly
> generated a manpage from sgml source and therefore needed the
> dependency, and he[1] simply forgot to remove the dependency when it
> was not necessary anymore.
Right. I wrote a Debian man page for the package but now upstream aut
> I assume that a former revision of Andrea's package dynamiclly
> generated a manpage from sgml source and therefore needed the
> dependency, and he[1] simply forgot to remove the dependency when it
> was not necessary anymore.
Right. I wrote a Debian man page for the package but now upstream aut
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:12:02PM +0100, Andrea Capriotti wrote:
> > I am really sorry for bringing this up one by one,
> No problem. ;)
> > but afaict the
> > Build-Dependency on docbook-to-man is completely superfluous.
> You are right, removed. Version 0.4.4-4 is available.
I'll try to find
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:14:25AM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Am Montag, 3. November 2003 13:37 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> > I am really sorry for bringing this up one by one, but afaict the
> > Build-Dependency on docbook-to-man is completely superfluous.
> Why?
> I found it neither in essential
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:12:02PM +0100, Andrea Capriotti wrote:
> > I am really sorry for bringing this up one by one,
> No problem. ;)
> > but afaict the
> > Build-Dependency on docbook-to-man is completely superfluous.
> You are right, removed. Version 0.4.4-4 is available.
I'll try to find
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:14:25AM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Am Montag, 3. November 2003 13:37 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> > I am really sorry for bringing this up one by one, but afaict the
> > Build-Dependency on docbook-to-man is completely superfluous.
> Why?
> I found it neither in essential
57 matches
Mail list logo
