On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:06:31AM +0100, Magos?nyi ?rp?d said
> Hi!
>
> Did I miss some clever tools, or if I have a build dependency
> uninstalled on a build machine, I should really bother its admin
> to install it?
On the buildd's, you mean? The buildd software will install all the
build-de
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:14:59PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Bugs 1,2,3 are tagged with fixed-in-experimental by the uploads of the
> betas. When we finally put 1.1 into unstable, are bugs 1,2,3
> automatically closed or do we have to join the changelogs from the beta
> releases and the 1.1 so t
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:14:59PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Bugs 1,2,3 are tagged with fixed-in-experimental by the uploads of the
> betas. When we finally put 1.1 into unstable, are bugs 1,2,3
> automatically closed or do we have to join the changelogs from the beta
> releases and the 1.1 so t
Hi!
When testing.pl [0] says a package A makes a package B uninstallable
and B has the latest version in testing, does that mean B must be
recompiled for A to enter?
[0] http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROT
Hi!
When testing.pl [0] says a package A makes a package B uninstallable
and B has the latest version in testing, does that mean B must be
recompiled for A to enter?
[0] http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROT
Hi *!
I did not find any information regarding bug closing when using
experimental.
We currently work on beta versions of PostgreSQL 7.4 and made
intermediate experimental versions. Thus, we have the following
changelog scheme:
Version 1.1 unstable
closes bug 4
---
Version 1.1.-beta2 experime
Hi!
Did I miss some clever tools, or if I have a build dependency
uninstalled on a build machine, I should really bother its admin
to install it?
--
GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból
Hi *!
I did not find any information regarding bug closing when using
experimental.
We currently work on beta versions of PostgreSQL 7.4 and made
intermediate experimental versions. Thus, we have the following
changelog scheme:
Version 1.1 unstable
closes bug 4
---
Version 1.1.-beta2 experime
Hi!
Did I miss some clever tools, or if I have a build dependency
uninstalled on a build machine, I should really bother its admin
to install it?
--
GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Some nitpicks (some important, some less so):
> You ship an empty /usr/sbin (debian/dirs)
Fixed.
> You ship two copies of the manpage, one in /usr/share/man/man1/ and one
> in /usr/share/man/man1/man1/.
Fixed.
> The tar.gz of upstream source should be renamed to
> anteater_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz.
> Some nitpicks (some important, some less so):
> You ship an empty /usr/sbin (debian/dirs)
Fixed.
> You ship two copies of the manpage, one in /usr/share/man/man1/ and one
> in /usr/share/man/man1/man1/.
Fixed.
> The tar.gz of upstream source should be renamed to
> anteater_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz.
Sponsor found. Thanks to all who offered!
Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
Hello!
I will take a look. If your packages are any good I'll sponsor'em.
[]s
Pablo
Em Qua, 29 Out 2003, Cory Dodt escreveu:
| Still looking for a sponsor. Packages reside at:
|deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unst
Sponsor found. Thanks to all who offered!
Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
Hello!
I will take a look. If your packages are any good I'll sponsor'em.
[]s
Pablo
Em Qua, 29 Out 2003, Cory Dodt escreveu:
| Still looking for a sponsor. Packages reside at:
|deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstab
> Hello,
> You forgot to tell us under which license the program is released
> under.
I'm sorry.
License is GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE:
http://anteater.drzoom.ch/license.phtml
> I've got a little bit of nitpicking about the Description:
> * Long and short description should be understandable o
> Hello,
> You forgot to tell us under which license the program is released
> under.
I'm sorry.
License is GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE:
http://anteater.drzoom.ch/license.phtml
> I've got a little bit of nitpicking about the Description:
> * Long and short description should be understandable o
This one time, at band camp, Andrea Capriotti said:
> I'm an applicant and I'm looking for a sponsor.
>
> http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=a.capriotti%40nettuno.it
>
> Package: anteater
Some nitpicks (some important, some less so):
You ship an empty /usr/sbin (debian/dirs)
You ship two co
This one time, at band camp, Andrea Capriotti said:
> I'm an applicant and I'm looking for a sponsor.
>
> http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=a.capriotti%40nettuno.it
>
> Package: anteater
Some nitpicks (some important, some less so):
You ship an empty /usr/sbin (debian/dirs)
You ship two co
Hi all,
I've just (re-)packaged the Ogg::Vorbis::Header module from CPAN.
Please take a look at the package. This is my first attempt at creating
debs, point out any errors.
I also have some questions, those follow the package description:
This package provides the perl the module Ogg::Vorbis::
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:03:48AM +0100, Andrea Capriotti wrote:
[...]
> Package: anteater
> Version: 0.4.4-1
> Priority: optional
> Section: mail
> Maintainer: Andrea Capriotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3.1-1), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.1-1)
> Architecture: i38
Hi all,
I've just (re-)packaged the Ogg::Vorbis::Header module from CPAN.
Please take a look at the package. This is my first attempt at creating
debs, point out any errors.
I also have some questions, those follow the package description:
This package provides the perl the module Ogg::Vorbis::
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:03:48AM +0100, Andrea Capriotti wrote:
[...]
> Package: anteater
> Version: 0.4.4-1
> Priority: optional
> Section: mail
> Maintainer: Andrea Capriotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3.1-1), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.1-1)
> Architecture: i38
21 matches
Mail list logo
