debian/rules not running ./configure

2003-10-24 Thread Zenaan Harkness
I'm trying to create my first package, and don't know what to do to get debian/rules to run ./configure. Eg: $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage: source package is fastdep dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.15-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTE

Looking for a sponsor

2003-10-24 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
Hello: I'm looking for someone who is interested in sponsoring the following Debian package: xmms-defx: A Sound alterator plug-in for xmms All files are avalaible in: http://www.igloo.cl/~bruno/xmms-defx/ Best Regards. -- Bruno Barrera C. " In this life we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fo

Looking for a sponsor

2003-10-24 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
Hello: I'm looking for someone who is interested in sponsoring the following Debian package: xmms-defx: A Sound alterator plug-in for xmms All files are avalaible in: http://www.igloo.cl/~bruno/xmms-defx/ Best Regards. -- Bruno Barrera C. " In this life we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fo

Re: Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:02:12PM -0400, Alexander Winston wrote: > Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and > am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian > developer and could not find any directions to follow in the > documentation related to

Re: RFS: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-24 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 10:22:48PM +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > This tool is the successor of the old avrprog shipped with woody. I'm already > done packaging it and would be happy to get some comments on my work. > You can find the files at http://mitglied.lycos.de/tenbahrt/debian > > Michael

Re: Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:02:12PM -0400, Alexander Winston wrote: > Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and > am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian > developer and could not find any directions to follow in the > documentation related to

Re: RFS: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-24 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 10:22:48PM +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > This tool is the successor of the old avrprog shipped with woody. I'm already > done packaging it and would be happy to get some comments on my work. > You can find the files at http://mitglied.lycos.de/tenbahrt/debian > > Michael

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > The funny thing is that I had an informal mail contact with the user and > asked him to make a formal bug report, so that I could see Depends and > all. I had no idea that one could turn this info off, and I fear the > user hasn't, ei

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information >besides Package name and version: This is provided by the reportbug command. >Does anybody know what he might have done? It's also possible to report bugs using th

RFM: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-24 Thread Michael Mayer
This tool is the successor of the old avrprog shipped with woody. I'm already done packaging it and would be happy to get some comments on my work. You can find the files at http://mitglied.lycos.de/tenbahrt/debian Michael Description: Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers Avrdude is t

Re: Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and > am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian > developer and could not find any directions to follow in the > documentation related to fixing bugs in orph

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Paul Telford
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-15] Frank Küster wrote: > in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information > besides Package name and version: At least the "system information" with > Debian release, Architecture, Kernel and the versions of packages that > $buggy_package dep

Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Alexander Winston
I had originally written the following letter to the debian-qa mailing list, but quickly discovered that the debian-mentors mailing is likely a better forum for my question. Yes, I know that cross-posting is discouraged, but I can assure you that it is not a chronic practice. Hi, I came across htt

how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information besides Package name and version: At least the "system information" with Debian release, Architecture, Kernel and the versions of packages that $buggy_package depends on. Sometimes there's even more, I guess that's when b

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, some comments on your package: - please try to use the same email address in control and changelog. - please set DH_VERBOSE back to 0 when you're finished testing the package. - the copyrights file should probably mention a valid URL like cvs://cvs.remotesensing.org/cvsroot/ or ft

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > The funny thing is that I had an informal mail contact with the user and > asked him to make a formal bug report, so that I could see Depends and > all. I had no idea that one could turn this info off, and I fear the > user hasn't, ei

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information >besides Package name and version: This is provided by the reportbug command. >Does anybody know what he might have done? It's also possible to report bugs using th

RFM: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-24 Thread Michael Mayer
This tool is the successor of the old avrprog shipped with woody. I'm already done packaging it and would be happy to get some comments on my work. You can find the files at http://mitglied.lycos.de/tenbahrt/debian Michael Description: Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers Avrdude is t

Re: Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and > am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian > developer and could not find any directions to follow in the > documentation related to fixing bugs in orph

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Paul Telford
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-15] Frank Küster wrote: > in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information > besides Package name and version: At least the "system information" with > Debian release, Architecture, Kernel and the versions of packages that > $buggy_package dep

Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Alexander Winston
I had originally written the following letter to the debian-qa mailing list, but quickly discovered that the debian-mentors mailing is likely a better forum for my question. Yes, I know that cross-posting is discouraged, but I can assure you that it is not a chronic practice. Hi, I came across htt

how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information besides Package name and version: At least the "system information" with Debian release, Architecture, Kernel and the versions of packages that $buggy_package depends on. Sometimes there's even more, I guess that's when b

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, some comments on your package: - please try to use the same email address in control and changelog. - please set DH_VERBOSE back to 0 when you're finished testing the package. - the copyrights file should probably mention a valid URL like cvs://cvs.remotesensing.org/cvsroot/ or ft

Re: RFS: gToDo

2003-10-24 Thread Amaya
Philipp Sadleder dijo: > Sources: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/gtodo/gtodo-0.13.5.tar.gz Hi, Philip. gtodo-0.13.5 is already uploaded and, as a new package, it needs manual editing to make it into the archive. -- I don't think you trust in my self-righteous suicide ._System Of