On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:00:33PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote:
> This is my second request for a sponsor, since no interest has been
> expressed following my original post a month ago. In the meanwhile I
> have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have continued to update the
> package as nece
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:00:33PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote:
> This is my second request for a sponsor, since no interest has been
> expressed following my original post a month ago. In the meanwhile I
> have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have continued to update the
> package as nece
This is my second request for a sponsor, since no interest has been
expressed following my original post a month ago. In the meanwhile I
have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have continued to update the
package as necessary. The concerns raised regarding PennMUSH's licensing
have also been
This is my second request for a sponsor, since no interest has been
expressed following my original post a month ago. In the meanwhile I
have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have continued to update the
package as necessary. The concerns raised regarding PennMUSH's licensing
have also been
Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I express this fact in debian/control?
Build-Conflicts
--
bye Joerg
Aqua mach mal man brain
maxx: schon probiert das gibts ned
pgpylZQL9K2VP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
> > python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
> > installed, then configure exists with an error. If
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
> python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
> installed, then configure exists with an error. If I remove
> python2.1, it builds okay.
> How can I express this f
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> AFAIK Build-Depends tells only what is needed,
> there is no method to tell to de-install (apt-get remove) a package
> before building.
I have found
file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebin
Hi!
Thank you for your advice. Did the RTFM, thought again, and will
raise the question on debian-devel, as the policy says.
I have re-re-read the part about the overrides in lintian manual,
and it occurs to me that one can ask an override for a warning
as well. Isn't it?
2003-10-14, k keltezéss
Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I express this fact in debian/control?
Build-Conflicts
--
bye Joerg
Aqua mach mal man brain
maxx: schon probiert das gibts ned
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
> python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
> installed, then configure exists with an error. If I remove
> python2.1, it builds okay.
> How can I expre
On 2003-10-14 20:51:18 +0100 Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I notify lintian-maint, or think about it again?
Think again. First, W indicates a warning. Secondly, wouldn't file
permissions be adequate protection? Finally, look this up in the policy
http://www.uk.debian.or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
> > python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
> > installed, then configure exists with an error. If
Hi!
lintian says the following:
W: zorp: non-standard-dir-perm etc/zorp/ 0700 != 0755
I think that it is reasonable that the directory be mode 700, as
it may contain sensitive data.
Should I notify lintian-maint, or think about it again?
--
GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
> python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
> installed, then configure exists with an error. If I remove
> python2.1, it builds okay.
> How can I express this f
Hi!
There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
installed, then configure exists with an error. If I remove
python2.1, it builds okay.
How can I express this fact in debian/control?
(Well, I know that it would be just a workarou
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> AFAIK Build-Depends tells only what is needed,
> there is no method to tell to de-install (apt-get remove) a package
> before building.
I have found
file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebin
Hi!
Thank you for your advice. Did the RTFM, thought again, and will
raise the question on debian-devel, as the policy says.
I have re-re-read the part about the overrides in lintian manual,
and it occurs to me that one can ask an override for a warning
as well. Isn't it?
2003-10-14, k keltezéss
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
> python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
> installed, then configure exists with an error. If I remove
> python2.1, it builds okay.
> How can I expre
On 2003-10-14 20:51:18 +0100 Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I notify lintian-maint, or think about it again?
Think again. First, W indicates a warning. Secondly, wouldn't file permissions be
adequate protection? Finally, look this up in the policy
http://www.uk.debian.or
Hi!
lintian says the following:
W: zorp: non-standard-dir-perm etc/zorp/ 0700 != 0755
I think that it is reasonable that the directory be mode 700, as
it may contain sensitive data.
Should I notify lintian-maint, or think about it again?
--
GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Hi!
There is a build-time conflict of the zorp package to
python2.1: if I have both python2.1 and python2.2-extclass
installed, then configure exists with an error. If I remove
python2.1, it builds okay.
How can I express this fact in debian/control?
(Well, I know that it would be just a workarou
Hi!
I wonder why libsigcx is not uploaded for m68k - it has been built
sucessfully on 1 Oct according to [0].
[0] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=libsigcx
Thanks for any information!
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
h
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> The syslog-ng package consists of two sources: syslog-ng itself, and
> libol.
> Now the packege is created by unpacking syslog-ng, dropping the libol
> tar.gz into the source tree, and adding the debian dir.
> It follows that either
Hi!
I wonder why libsigcx is not uploaded for m68k - it has been built
sucessfully on 1 Oct according to [0].
[0] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=libsigcx
Thanks for any information!
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
h
Package was uploaded by Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Hi!
The syslog-ng package consists of two sources: syslog-ng itself, and
libol.
Now the packege is created by unpacking syslog-ng, dropping the libol
tar.gz into the source tree, and adding the debian dir.
It follows that either I build a package which looks like a native
debian package or dpkg-so
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> The syslog-ng package consists of two sources: syslog-ng itself, and
> libol.
> Now the packege is created by unpacking syslog-ng, dropping the libol
> tar.gz into the source tree, and adding the debian dir.
> It follows that either
I've uploaded the libogg-vorbis-header-perl packages on the
mentors.debian.net site; they're available from:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/
libogg-vorbis-header-perl/
and
deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debia
Package was uploaded by Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
The syslog-ng package consists of two sources: syslog-ng itself, and
libol.
Now the packege is created by unpacking syslog-ng, dropping the libol
tar.gz into the source tree, and adding the debian dir.
It follows that either I build a package which looks like a native
debian package or dpkg-so
I've uploaded the libogg-vorbis-header-perl packages on the
mentors.debian.net site; they're available from:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/
libogg-vorbis-header-perl/
and
deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debia
32 matches
Mail list logo
