Re: Need help: difficult NM / requestor

2003-09-25 Thread Roland Mas
Roland Mas (2003-08-25 11:52:06 +0200) : > Roland Mas (2003-07-24 18:25:55 +0200) : > > [...] > >> Anyway, the offer as it stands is this (fairly standard) >> sponsorhip offer: Eray makes fixed packages, makes them available >> on a public URL, posts this URL to debian-mentors (possibly Cc:ing >

Fw: RFS: libcommons-lang-java (2.0-1) -- Extension of the java.lang package

2003-09-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi everybody, I'm still looking for a sponsor to update my package, many thanks. On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:29:58 +0200 (CEST) Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libcommons-lang-java (2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release > * build system is now cdbs > > -- Arnaud V

Fw: RFS: libxt-java (0.20020426a-1) -- An implementation in Java of XSL Transformations

2003-09-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor to upload libxt-java. Ola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) did (quickly) look at the package and agree with the upload but has no time to do it. Many thanks for your time, -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** : :' : Arnaud Vandyck `. `' http://alioth.de

Fw: RFS: libcommons-lang-java (2.0-1) -- Extension of the java.lang package

2003-09-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi everybody, I'm still looking for a sponsor to update my package, many thanks. On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:29:58 +0200 (CEST) Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libcommons-lang-java (2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release > * build system is now cdbs > > -- Arnaud V

Fw: RFS: libxt-java (0.20020426a-1) -- An implementation in Java of XSL Transformations

2003-09-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor to upload libxt-java. Ola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) did (quickly) look at the package and agree with the upload but has no time to do it. Many thanks for your time, -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** : :' : Arnaud Vandyck `. `' http://alioth.deb

Build-Depends-Indep and buildd question

2003-09-25 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
(I tried sending this email to debian-mentors already but it doesn't appear to be in the message archives now, some 16 hours later. Strange. Please CC me any replies since I'm not subscribed to the list.) I just got an FTBFS bug on cernlib from a buildd. The problem is that the buildd didn't in

Build-Depends-Indep and buildd question

2003-09-25 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
(I tried sending this email to debian-mentors already but it doesn't appear to be in the message archives now, some 16 hours later. Strange. Please CC me any replies since I'm not subscribed to the list.) I just got an FTBFS bug on cernlib from a buildd. The problem is that the buildd didn't in

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [debconf] > I think you are being too cautious. A couple of device-nodes is no big > deal, we aren't talking about tens of kilobytes of wasted diskspace or > big fat dependencies. Okay, removed it and built 0.7.0-0.balu.3 available

RFS: asis -- Ada Semantic Interface Specification

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged asis, the Ada Semantic Interface Specification. This source package produces 3 binary packages: asis-programs, libasis-3.15p-1, and libasis-3.15p-1-dev. All packages, source and binary, are available on my repository, and are signed with my GPG key. This key is on keys.debian.or

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [debconf] > I think you are being too cautious. A couple of device-nodes is no big > deal, we aren't talking about tens of kilobytes of wasted diskspace or > big fat dependencies. Okay, removed it and built 0.7.0-0.balu.3 available

Re: IRAF Deb -- first pass

2003-09-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:42:15PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 07:13 pm, Zed Pobre wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:31:35PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: > > > My package installs into /opt/iraf/iraf which seems to make sense > > > from the FHS standard, > >

RFS for an update of mkultra

2003-09-25 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi mentors, I would need sponsorship for an update of mkultra, solving an RC bug. The package is ready for quite some time, and should already been uploaded, but my previous sponsor for this package seems too busy to handle this sponsorship, and my AM doesn't have KDE... Could someone upload the

RFS: gnat-glade-doc -- GNAT Distributed Systems Annex documentation

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged gnat-glade-doc and am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages into unstable. The source and binary packages are available from my repository. They have been signed by my GPG key, which is on keys.debian.org and has been signed by a Debian developer. My repository is at: deb

RFS: gnat-glade -- Distributed Systems Annex for GNAT (GNU Ada 95 compiler)

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged gnat-glade and am looking for a sponsor for this package. The sources and binaries are available from my repository, and are signed with my GPG key which is on keys.debian.org and has been signed by a Debian developer. My repository is at: deb http://www.ada-france.org/debian ad

RFS: asis -- Ada Semantic Interface Specification

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged asis, the Ada Semantic Interface Specification. This source package produces 3 binary packages: asis-programs, libasis-3.15p-1, and libasis-3.15p-1-dev. All packages, source and binary, are available on my repository, and are signed with my GPG key. This key is on keys.debian.or

Re: IRAF Deb -- first pass

2003-09-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:42:15PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 07:13 pm, Zed Pobre wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:31:35PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: > > > My package installs into /opt/iraf/iraf which seems to make sense > > > from the FHS standard, > >

RFS: gnat-doc -- Documentation for the GNU Ada compiler

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have package the documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which comes in a separate upstream package. The package is available on my repository, and is signed with my GPG key. My GPG key is on keys.debian.org, and it has been signed by a Debian Developer. My repository is at: deb http://www.ada-france.

RFS: gnat 3.15p

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Folks, I have packaged GNAT 3.15p for Debian, and would like someone to sponsor the package for me. The source package creates 2 binary packages; gnat and libgnat-3.15p-1. The packages are signed with my GPG key, which is in keys.debian.org (it has been signed by a Debian Developer). The packag

RFS for an update of mkultra

2003-09-25 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi mentors, I would need sponsorship for an update of mkultra, solving an RC bug. The package is ready for quite some time, and should already been uploaded, but my previous sponsor for this package seems too busy to handle this sponsorship, and my AM doesn't have KDE... Could someone upload the

RFS: gnat-glade-doc -- GNAT Distributed Systems Annex documentation

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged gnat-glade-doc and am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages into unstable. The source and binary packages are available from my repository. They have been signed by my GPG key, which is on keys.debian.org and has been signed by a Debian developer. My repository is at: deb

RFS: gnat-glade -- Distributed Systems Annex for GNAT (GNU Ada 95 compiler)

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged gnat-glade and am looking for a sponsor for this package. The sources and binaries are available from my repository, and are signed with my GPG key which is on keys.debian.org and has been signed by a Debian developer. My repository is at: deb http://www.ada-france.org/debian ad

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:18:30PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:01:29AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Please undo that, either generate the devices[1] or don't but don't add > > another debconf question just because you can. > > Rule of the thumb: *Only* ask

RFS: gnat-doc -- Documentation for the GNU Ada compiler

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have package the documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which comes in a separate upstream package. The package is available on my repository, and is signed with my GPG key. My GPG key is on keys.debian.org, and it has been signed by a Debian Developer. My repository is at: deb http://www.ada-france.

RFS: gnat 3.15p

2003-09-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Folks, I have packaged GNAT 3.15p for Debian, and would like someone to sponsor the package for me. The source package creates 2 binary packages; gnat and libgnat-3.15p-1. The packages are signed with my GPG key, which is in keys.debian.org (it has been signed by a Debian Developer). The packag

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:01:29AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Please undo that, either generate the devices[1] or don't but don't add > another debconf question just because you can. > > Rule of the thumb: *Only* ask if there is no sane default. The problem is that there is no sane default I

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:18:30PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:01:29AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Please undo that, either generate the devices[1] or don't but don't add > > another debconf question just because you can. > > Rule of the thumb: *Only* ask

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:41:53AM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: [...] > I've changed the following things from the first .deb I've posted here: > * Added debconf to ask wether to create video devices or not (and removed > that part from the README) [...] Please undo that, either gene

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:01:29AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Please undo that, either generate the devices[1] or don't but don't add > another debconf question just because you can. > > Rule of the thumb: *Only* ask if there is no sane default. The problem is that there is no sane default I

Re: camsource-0.7.0-0.balu.2 - ready for sponsoring?

2003-09-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:41:53AM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: [...] > I've changed the following things from the first .deb I've posted here: > * Added debconf to ask wether to create video devices or not (and removed > that part from the README) [...] Please undo that, either gene

Build-Depends-Indep and buildd question

2003-09-25 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi, I just got an FTBFS bug on cernlib from a buildd. The problem is that the buildd didn't install the Build-Depends-Indep dependency (tetex-bin) before running dpkg-buildpackage (which in turn calls debian/rules build). Therefore the build died in the debian/rules build-indep target. Is this