Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote:
> > Hello, I wrote a new source-building tool for APT and am looking for
> > somebody to sponsor it.
> >
> > Here's an excerpt I wrote for the README file:
> >
> > Why APT-Fu? Why not use an existing source-building tool in Debian?
>
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote:
> > Hello, I wrote a new source-building tool for APT and am looking for
> > somebody to sponsor it.
> >
> > Here's an excerpt I wrote for the README file:
> >
> > Why APT-Fu? Why not use an existing source-building tool in Debian?
>
Eric Wong wrote:
> Hello, I wrote a new source-building tool for APT and am looking for
> somebody to sponsor it.
>
> Here's an excerpt I wrote for the README file:
>
> Why APT-Fu? Why not use an existing source-building tool in Debian?
I think it's a bad idea to add yet another duplicate
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:45:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> You may generate the devices in postinst without asking the user, you
> just have to depend on makedev.
I am not sure wether this should be done. I am thinking of devfs-users
(or does makedev handle this?) or users who d
Hello, I wrote a new source-building tool for APT and am looking for
somebody to sponsor it.
Here's an excerpt I wrote for the README file:
Why APT-Fu? Why not use an existing source-building tool in Debian?
The source-building tools I've encountered in Debian have all had their
s
Eric Wong wrote:
> Hello, I wrote a new source-building tool for APT and am looking for
> somebody to sponsor it.
>
> Here's an excerpt I wrote for the README file:
>
> Why APT-Fu? Why not use an existing source-building tool in Debian?
I think it's a bad idea to add yet another duplicate
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:45:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> You may generate the devices in postinst without asking the user, you
> just have to depend on makedev.
I am not sure wether this should be done. I am thinking of devfs-users
(or does makedev handle this?) or users who d
Hello, I wrote a new source-building tool for APT and am looking for
somebody to sponsor it.
Here's an excerpt I wrote for the README file:
Why APT-Fu? Why not use an existing source-building tool in Debian?
The source-building tools I've encountered in Debian have all had their
s
Hi all,
My current sponsor appears to be unavailable, so I wonder if anyone
else would have time to sponsor this package for me? I'm interested in
getting the package into testing, and this upload should close some
bugs.
Additionally, if anyone knows where I can get access to alpha, m68k,
or ia64
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:15:33PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> Can someone please have a look at my just finished .debs?
I just peeked at the diff.
> More info on the package can be found at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211538
>
> The packages can be found
Can someone please have a look at my just finished .debs?
More info on the package can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211538
The packages can be found at
http://www.b-a-l-u.de/debian/camsource/
They were checked by lintian and linda and were clean
Hi all,
My current sponsor appears to be unavailable, so I wonder if anyone
else would have time to sponsor this package for me? I'm interested in
getting the package into testing, and this upload should close some
bugs.
Additionally, if anyone knows where I can get access to alpha, m68k,
or ia64
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:15:33PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> Can someone please have a look at my just finished .debs?
I just peeked at the diff.
> More info on the package can be found at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211538
>
> The packages can be found
Can someone please have a look at my just finished .debs?
More info on the package can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211538
The packages can be found at
http://www.b-a-l-u.de/debian/camsource/
They were checked by lintian and linda and were clean
Hi,
I am currently working on a package that needs to mimic sysvinit's
symlink farm. I have a bunch of scripts put into /etc/network/if.d
which are in turn symlinked to /etc/network/if-$NAME.d for different
values of $NAME.
I'd like to have the symlinks in the package as conffiles, but dpkg
doesn
Hi,
I am currently working on a package that needs to mimic sysvinit's
symlink farm. I have a bunch of scripts put into /etc/network/if.d
which are in turn symlinked to /etc/network/if-$NAME.d for different
values of $NAME.
I'd like to have the symlinks in the package as conffiles, but dpkg
doesn
16 matches
Mail list logo
