Re: Lintian complaining about ldconfig in postrm-remove

2003-08-24 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:32:14PM +0200, Dominik Stadler wrote: > W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig > N: > N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call > N: ldconfig when given the argument "remove". > N: > N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 9.1.1 for details. > N:

Re: gcc versions and c++ packages

2003-08-24 Thread Bob Proulx
David Meggy wrote: > Searching the mailing lists, oddly shows up nothing. I think the debian > mailing list search page needs some fixing. I think this was in debian-devel. Since I had the page up in my browser when I read your message here it is. http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transiti

gcc versions and c++ packages

2003-08-24 Thread David Meggy
Hi I had a few questions about how to package a program that needs a new version of gcc, but links to libraries compiled with the an old version of gcc. I have gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.3.1 installed. My program won't compile with gcc 2.95.3, so I have been using 3.3.1. However it links against libg

Re: gcc versions and c++ packages

2003-08-24 Thread David Meggy
Searching the mailing lists, oddly shows up nothing. I think the debian mailing list search page needs some fixing. I'm actually using gtkmm1.2 not 2.0 so there is no c102 version. I guess I will send an e-mail to the maintaner and ask. Which leaves me one big question. How do I force my progr

Re: gcc versions and c++ packages

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David Meggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > I had a few questions about how to package a program that needs a new > version of gcc, but links to libraries compiled with the an old version > of gcc. > > I have gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.3.1 installed. My program won't compile > with gcc 2.95.3, s

Re: Lintian complaining about ldconfig in postrm-remove

2003-08-24 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:32:14PM +0200, Dominik Stadler wrote: > W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig > N: > N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call > N: ldconfig when given the argument "remove". > N: > N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 9.1.1 for details. > N:

Re: Lintian complaining about ldconfig in postrm-remove

2003-08-24 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dominik Stadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When running lintian, I always get the following warning: > > W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig > N: > N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call > N: ldconfig when given t

gcc versions and c++ packages

2003-08-24 Thread David Meggy
Hi I had a few questions about how to package a program that needs a new version of gcc, but links to libraries compiled with the an old version of gcc. I have gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.3.1 installed. My program won't compile with gcc 2.95.3, so I have been using 3.3.1. However it links against libg

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [Please don't send me private copies of list mail.] > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead o

Lintian complaining about ldconfig in postrm-remove

2003-08-24 Thread Dominik Stadler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When running lintian, I always get the following warning: W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig N: N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call N: ldconfig when given the argument "remove". N: N: Refer to Policy Manual, s

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before > > > next one :-) > > > > I would need a parser for the claims p

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. > > > > If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before > > next one :-) > > I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of writing that I > installed debbugs and

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. > > If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there. The

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) : > > > By they way: > > How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs? > > Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Roland Mas
Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) : > By they way: > How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs? Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. > #196450 simplecdrx: FTBFS with g++-3.3: Missing include Done already. > #197214 libggi: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses multi

Re: Lintian complaining about ldconfig in postrm-remove

2003-08-24 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dominik Stadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When running lintian, I always get the following warning: > > W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig > N: > N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call > N: ldconfig when given t

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [Please don't send me private copies of list mail.] > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead o

Lintian complaining about ldconfig in postrm-remove

2003-08-24 Thread Dominik Stadler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When running lintian, I always get the following warning: W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig N: N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call N: ldconfig when given the argument "remove". N: N: Refer to Policy Manual, s

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before > > > next one :-) > > > > I would need a parser for the claims p

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. > > > > If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.

Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, I went through the RC bug list and collected Bugs with trivial patches and sorted them a bit. They realy don't need much work so if you have a minute pick one. If you want to NMU any of them check the then currently claimed bugs (url under claimed bugs). Changes (~24h): pending (-2), fixed(+1

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before > > next one :-) > > I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of writing that I > installed debbugs and

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. > > If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there. The

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) : > > > By they way: > > How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs? > > Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.

Re: Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Roland Mas
Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) : > By they way: > How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs? Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No. > #196450 simplecdrx: FTBFS with g++-3.3: Missing include Done already. > #197214 libggi: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses multi

Update: Patch needs Sponsor - List of easily NMUed RC bugs

2003-08-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, I went through the RC bug list and collected Bugs with trivial patches and sorted them a bit. They realy don't need much work so if you have a minute pick one. If you want to NMU any of them check the then currently claimed bugs (url under claimed bugs). Changes (~24h): pending (-2), fixed(+1