On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
> someone distinguish the configuration section and how that applies to
> debian packages for me (the eternal newbie).
There are several "configuration sections" yo
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the python-albatross package (ITP
#193574). I've been looking for a sponsor since May, and the package has
now progressed to the new upstream version that was released in July.
My wish is that prospective sponsors be prepared to do some minor
mentoring to help me
should have added that I also tried the fakeroot /debian/rules binary to
build the .deb, but it just told me that it didn't find a file on a line
that didn't exist in my /rules file.
eric
Winger, Eric wrote:
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone distin
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:58:30PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> I have a question about how I am supposed to handle upstream's files related
> to copyrights and distribution. They provide a README file that has the
> actual copyright notice, i.e., "Copyright (c) 1994, 1995, 1996 James Clark,
> 1999
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone distinguish the configuration section and how that applies to
debian packages for me (the eternal newbie).
I was under the impression that the configuration rules were what the
package would run after it was loaded. H
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so this is not
> >> an option.
> >
> > I tried it on the binary distribution of GNAT 3.15p. I did not get
> > any warnings:
>
> Hmm, I can't rep
Hello,
I am seeking for a sponsor for arp-sk:
Package: arp-sk
Version: 0.0.15-1
Section: net
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
License: GPL
Upstream Author: Frédéric Raynal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream web: http://www.arp-sk.org
Description: A swiss knife tool for ARP
Arp-sk is a tool that a
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so this is not
>> an option.
>
> I tried it on the binary distribution of GNAT 3.15p. I did not get
> any warnings:
Hmm, I can't reproduce it right now. But it looks to me like a policy
violati
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The real problem is the soname. I'm willing to change the soname to
> > "libgnat-3.15p.so" (removing the .1) to become more compatible with
> > ACT's GNAT, but does that violate the Debian Policy?
>
>
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The real problem is the soname. I'm willing to change the soname to
> "libgnat-3.15p.so" (removing the .1) to become more compatible with
> ACT's GNAT, but does that violate the Debian Policy?
The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The real problem is the soname. I'm willing to change the soname to
> > "libgnat-3.15p.so" (removing the .1) to become more compatible with
> > ACT's GNAT, but does that violate the Debian Policy?
>
>
Hello,
We have a debian package for pyduali (Arabic Spellchecker) and we are looking
for someone to sponsor it. I have been told to ask here first, so here I am ;)
Here is the debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=202940
Regards,
Mohamemd Elzubeir
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so this is not
>> an option.
>
> I tried it on the binary distribution of GNAT 3.15p. I did not get
> any warnings:
Hmm, I can't reproduce it right now. But it looks to me like a policy
violati
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Your shared library support is probably incompatible with ACT's. Do
> >> you really want to enable it by default?
> >
> > Well, yes, I would like to, especially since gnat 3.14p did, too.
>
> Ah, let
Duck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> P.S. : i don't c the point of creating/finalizing, could u add a full exemple
> with explanations in ur pkg ?
Yep. I'm thinking about some more docs than the manpage.
The short version follows.
"create" creates a subdir with the loopback file, the mountpoint
16 matches
Mail list logo
