Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> But presumably you _would_ have a problem with:
> - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in
> the new library
> - the new library trying to look up a string which isn't there in the old
> library
Of course the message catalog would c
Hello mentors,
I look for a sponsor for codestriker
I put this on : http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
Nicolas Thomas
Codestriker a collaborative code reviewing.
Site is here http://codestriker.sourceforge.net/
Including a demo. I already have packa
Hello mentors,
I look for a sponsor for codestriker
I put this on : http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
Nicolas Thomas
Codestriker a collaborative code reviewing.
Site is here http://codestriker.sourceforge.net/
Including a demo. I already have packa
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:53:42PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I and some friends of mine stated doing some packages for Debian. The
> packages are all OK, but there are some things that we would like to know:
> What are the options or alternatives that I can put on Section: of the
> fi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
> the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an
> Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it's of course architecture independent.
>
> In d
Frank Küster wrote:
> In the original package's control file, there is a line of
> Build-Depends-Indep, but no Build-Depends. Does this make sense for a
> source package that has no architecture dependent binary packages at
> all? Why not just use Build-Depends here and use Build-Depends-Indep
> on
Hi people
I am new here, so sorry for anything.
I and some friends of mine stated doing some packages for Debian. The
packages are all OK, but there are some things that we would like to know:
What are the options or alternatives that I can put on Section: of the
file 'control'?
And the file '
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > This would only be feasible if the message catalog never changed.
> > Presumably, it corresponds to translated strings in the library, which
> > might not be identical in different versions of the library.
>
> Personally I don'
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:53:42PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I and some friends of mine stated doing some packages for Debian. The
> packages are all OK, but there are some things that we would like to know:
> What are the options or alternatives that I can put on Section: of the
> fi
Hi,
for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an
Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it's of course architecture independent.
In debian/rules of the "real" package from unstable, binary requires
binary-arch
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> This would only be feasible if the message catalog never changed.
> Presumably, it corresponds to translated strings in the library, which
> might not be identical in different versions of the library.
Personally I don't have a problem with the old library "acquiring"
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:28:17AM -0400, John Belmonte wrote:
> I'm wondering if the control mailserver can tolerate a PGP/MIME message.
> The case is when you want to combine control commands and a bug
> follow-up, and have your message signed.
Yes, it can.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
> the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an
> Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it's of course architecture independent.
>
> In d
I'm wondering if the control mailserver can tolerate a PGP/MIME message.
The case is when you want to combine control commands and a bug
follow-up, and have your message signed.
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if l .o /
Frank Küster wrote:
> In the original package's control file, there is a line of
> Build-Depends-Indep, but no Build-Depends. Does this make sense for a
> source package that has no architecture dependent binary packages at
> all? Why not just use Build-Depends here and use Build-Depends-Indep
> on
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:39:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No; and, moreover, you should not be relying on machines not under your
> > (or Debian's) control in order to build binary packages that will be
> > uploaded to the
Hi people
I am new here, so sorry for anything.
I and some friends of mine stated doing some packages for Debian. The
packages are all OK, but there are some things that we would like to know:
What are the options or alternatives that I can put on Section: of the
file 'control'?
And the file 'm
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > This would only be feasible if the message catalog never changed.
> > Presumably, it corresponds to translated strings in the library, which
> > might not be identical in different versions of the library.
>
> Personally I don'
Hi,
for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an
Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it's of course architecture independent.
In debian/rules of the "real" package from unstable, binary requires
binary-arch
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> This would only be feasible if the message catalog never changed.
> Presumably, it corresponds to translated strings in the library, which
> might not be identical in different versions of the library.
Personally I don't have a problem with the old library "acquiring"
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:28:17AM -0400, John Belmonte wrote:
> I'm wondering if the control mailserver can tolerate a PGP/MIME message.
> The case is when you want to combine control commands and a bug
> follow-up, and have your message signed.
Yes, it can.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:57:51AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > If the message files are identical, another solution would be to create a
> > third package with the message files which you depend on in the library
> > packages. (The former should of course conflict with older versions
> > of t
I'm wondering if the control mailserver can tolerate a PGP/MIME message.
The case is when you want to combine control commands and a bug
follow-up, and have your message signed.
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if l .o /
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:39:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No; and, moreover, you should not be relying on machines not under your
> > (or Debian's) control in order to build binary packages that will be
> > uploaded to the
On Jul 30, Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should either version the files, or move them into another package.
On Jul 31, Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, Paul.Hampso wrote:
>
> > Look up 'Replaces' in the policy or developer's guide or whatnot.
>
> The two
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:57:51AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > If the message files are identical, another solution would be to create a
> > third package with the message files which you depend on in the library
> > packages. (The former should of course conflict with older versions
> > of t
On Jul 30, Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should either version the files, or move them into another package.
On Jul 31, Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, Paul.Hampso wrote:
>
> > Look up 'Replaces' in the policy or developer's guide or whatnot.
>
> The two
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:14:42AM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > A way to compile unstable on a stable systems is like this:
> >
> > Run debootstrap on an unstable system,
> > make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
>
Hi, Paul.Hampso wrote:
> Look up 'Replaces' in the policy or developer's guide or whatnot.
The two libraries need to coexist peacefully. Replaces: doesn't help here.
If the message files are identical, another solution would be to create a
third package with the message files which you depend on
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A way to compile unstable on a stable systems is like this:
>
> Run debootstrap on an unstable system,
> make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
> unpack the tarball there and chroot into it.
Unfortunately, unless Dre
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:05:24PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I'm using sourceforge's compile farm and I'd like to know how to use it to
> compile packages for unstable. They use woody. I also have an account on
> HP's testdrive systems.
Why don't you use a chroot to build your pack
Hi, Paul.Hampso wrote:
> Look up 'Replaces' in the policy or developer's guide or whatnot.
The two libraries need to coexist peacefully. Replaces: doesn't help here.
If the message files are identical, another solution would be to create a
third package with the message files which you depend on
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:14:42AM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > A way to compile unstable on a stable systems is like this:
> >
> > Run debootstrap on an unstable system,
> > make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:39:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:05:24PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > I'm using sourceforge's compile farm and I'd like to know how to use it to
> > compile packages for unstable. They use woody. I also have an account on
> > HP's
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A way to compile unstable on a stable systems is like this:
>
> Run debootstrap on an unstable system,
> make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
> unpack the tarball there and chroot into it.
Unfortunately, unless Dre
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:05:24PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I'm using sourceforge's compile farm and I'd like to know how to use it to
> compile packages for unstable. They use woody. I also have an account on
> HP's testdrive systems.
Why don't you use a chroot to build your pack
36 matches
Mail list logo
