Re: lintian W: sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib

2003-07-28 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:42:48 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lintian, however, can't know that this particular library usually is >> preloaded, not linked to. Hence the override. > >If its use is going to be something like that, please don't put it in >/usr/lib. That's what the

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:06PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > > Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget > > might serve as a workaround? > > I guees he would need something like > > (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) > > which isn't possible. It is po

Re: RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would > like to sponsor me? [...] > All relevant files are on > ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian/ I'd be happy to, but: $ lftp ftp://ftp.ceplovi.c

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:06PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > > Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget > > might serve as a workaround? > > I guees he would need something like > > (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) > > which isn't possible. It is po

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote: > It _is_ so. > Definitely. I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is clearly *not* exclusively the case. -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:56:07PM -0600, Larry Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has > > compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really > > wants to get pose in, they can donat

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Larry Gilbert
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: > In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has > compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really > wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and > sponsor). Would you settle

Re: RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would > like to sponsor me? [...] > All relevant files are on > ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian/ I'd be happy to, but: $ lftp ftp://ftp.ceplovi.c

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. > > bullshit > > Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no > packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:04:34PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > all doing your Debian work in own spare time, but doesn't this ring a bell > that there is something in the whole procedure that simply does not work? OK, please suggest a better way. Criteria to be fulfilled are: 1) Nobody shoul

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
Thanks for your response-- On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:47:46AM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > > So I applied to become a DD, got my key signed and my application > > verified, and now I am waiting for an AM assignment. > Make sure you've done your homework. The key is signed, good! Is > the package l

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. bullshit Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for about the first month or so after I got m

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. I don't think it is as clear-cut as that, but its probably a good way to think of it. Probably a better way of looking at it is if you don't have a package in the archive, yo

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel wrote: > I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery > program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps > already too many image gallery programs in Debian, but, as several other > people mentio

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcur

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote: > It _is_ so. > Definitely. I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is clearly *not* exclusively the case. -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:56:07PM -0600, Larry Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has > > compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really > > wants to get pose in, they can donat

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Larry Gilbert
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: > In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has > compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really > wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and > sponsor). Would you settle

Re: Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:44:31PM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote: > transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp: In constructor ` >transponderDefinitionWidget::transponderDefinitionWidget(QWidget*, const >char*, unsigned int)': > transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp:46: error: invalid use of undefined type ` >

Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Jaime Robles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I am trying to fix a ktrack's bug (Bug#203080) and i am having some problems as KTrack does not compile since i updated my unstable debian system... (apt-get upgrade). Some of the kdelibs has been upgraded (i suppose that) and maybe i am m

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. > > bullshit > > Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no > packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: > > > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, > > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, > > but I can't upload it because I'm not y

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Kessel wrote: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I yes. You won't be approved with no package in the a

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Marcin Orlowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 23:05]: > www.apt-get.org counts over 15000 packages at the moment and Juan shall > register there too, to at least not waste all his efforts. But we can only > guess how many of packages out there has been not requested for mention > here due to other

RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:04:34PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > all doing your Debian work in own spare time, but doesn't this ring a bell > that there is something in the whole procedure that simply does not work? OK, please suggest a better way. Criteria to be fulfilled are: 1) Nobody shoul

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
Thanks for your response-- On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:47:46AM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > > So I applied to become a DD, got my key signed and my application > > verified, and now I am waiting for an AM assignment. > Make sure you've done your homework. The key is signed, good! Is > the package l

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hi, Le Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel écrivait: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I > unders

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. bullshit Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for about the first month or so after I got m

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. I don't think it is as clear-cut as that, but its probably a good way to think of it. Probably a better way of looking at it is if you don't have a package in the archive, yo

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel wrote: > I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery > program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps > already too many image gallery programs in Debian, but, as several other > people mentio

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Marcin Orlowski
On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, > but I can't upload it because I'm not yet a Debian Developer. It's my 5th > t

vimoutliner -- plea for sponsoring

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcur

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:20, Adam Kessel wrote: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I > understand it can take many

Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
I'm a little confused about the timeline of the sponsor vs. developer process. I have read the relevant documents at debian.org/devel. I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps already too many im

Re: Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:44:31PM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote: > transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp: In constructor ` >transponderDefinitionWidget::transponderDefinitionWidget(QWidget*, const >char*, unsigned int)': > transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp:46: error: invalid use of undefined type ` >

Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Jaime Robles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I am trying to fix a ktrack's bug (Bug#203080) and i am having some problems as KTrack does not compile since i updated my unstable debian system... (apt-get upgrade). Some of the kdelibs has been upgraded (i suppose that) and maybe i am m

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: > > > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, > > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, > > but I can't upload it because I'm not y

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Kessel wrote: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I yes. You won't be approved with no package in the a

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Marcin Orlowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 23:05]: > www.apt-get.org counts over 15000 packages at the moment and Juan shall > register there too, to at least not waste all his efforts. But we can only > guess how many of packages out there has been not requested for mention > here due to other

RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hi, Le Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel écrivait: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I > unders

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Marcin Orlowski
On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, > but I can't upload it because I'm not yet a Debian Developer. It's my 5th > t

vimoutliner -- plea for sponsoring

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:20, Adam Kessel wrote: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I > understand it can take many

Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
I'm a little confused about the timeline of the sponsor vs. developer process. I have read the relevant documents at debian.org/devel. I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps already too many im

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Michel! You wrote: > Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget > might serve as a workaround? I guees he would need something like (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) which isn't possible. -- Kind regards, +-

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:14, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't > ava

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcur

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcur

Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread David Roundy
Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't available, in which case it just uses an external program (eithe

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Michel! You wrote: > Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget > might serve as a workaround? I guees he would need something like (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) which isn't possible. -- Kind regards, +-

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:14, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't > ava

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcur

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would > give you its equivalent? > > The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without > libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcur

Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread David Roundy
Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't available, in which case it just uses an external program (eithe

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Roland Mas
Frederic Wagner (2003-07-28 10:10:34 +0200) : > everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : > > W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate > > which I don't fully understand. There's a nice switch called -i for lintian that gives you more info on

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Frederic Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : > >W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate > >which I don't fully understand. Try "lintian -i". You've probably left "Author(s):" in there. As it is dec

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Frederic Wagner
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Frederic Wagner (2003-07-25 15:33:31 +0200) : hi, sorry for the little delay, the network connection has been down at the university. > You should also close the ITA in the changelog, and change the > Maintainer: field in debian/contro

RFS: libi18n-java -- internationalization library for java

2003-07-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all! I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libi18n-java which is a library I'll need for the next stable release of ArgoUML. http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/libi18n-java-0.1.tar.gz Many thanks for your time and help, -- Arnaud Vandyck http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Roland Mas
Frederic Wagner (2003-07-28 10:10:34 +0200) : > everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : > > W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate > > which I don't fully understand. There's a nice switch called -i for lintian that gives you more info on

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Frederic Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : > >W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate > >which I don't fully understand. Try "lintian -i". You've probably left "Author(s):" in there. As it is dec

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Frederic Wagner
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Frederic Wagner (2003-07-25 15:33:31 +0200) : hi, sorry for the little delay, the network connection has been down at the university. > You should also close the ITA in the changelog, and change the > Maintainer: field in debian/contro

RFS: libi18n-java -- internationalization library for java

2003-07-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all! I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libi18n-java which is a library I'll need for the next stable release of ArgoUML. http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/libi18n-java-0.1.tar.gz Many thanks for your time and help, -- Arnaud Vandyck http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/