Re: RFS agrep

2003-07-20 Thread Luk Claes
> >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has > >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available. > > > > Where can I find more information on that? > > Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken > (agrep is in non-free for other reas

Re: RFS agrep

2003-07-20 Thread Luk Claes
> >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has > >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available. > > > > Where can I find more information on that? > > Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken > (agrep is in non-free for other reas

Re: RFS agrep

2003-07-20 Thread Florian Weimer
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available. > > Where can I find more information on that? Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken (agrep is

Re: RFS since

2003-07-20 Thread Luk Claes
> You need to change the following lines again: > >* New maintainer (closes #201365). >* debhelper in Build-Depends (closes #190527). > > to insert ':' after the word 'closes'. > > To test your 'closes:' statement (there are other variations) against > the regular expression, do something l

Re: RFS agrep

2003-07-20 Thread Florian Weimer
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available. > > Where can I find more information on that? Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken (agrep is

Re: RFS since

2003-07-20 Thread Luk Claes
> You need to change the following lines again: > >* New maintainer (closes #201365). >* debhelper in Build-Depends (closes #190527). > > to insert ':' after the word 'closes'. > > To test your 'closes:' statement (there are other variations) against > the regular expression, do something l

Re: moving packages from non-free to main

2003-07-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:35:40PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > A license change in kanjidic and edict packages will allow > them to move to main. Also, xjdic which is in contrib will > also move to main (and maybe other packages depending on > edict and kanjidic). > > I've uploaded the new edic

Re: moving packages from non-free to main

2003-07-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:35:40PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > A license change in kanjidic and edict packages will allow > them to move to main. Also, xjdic which is in contrib will > also move to main (and maybe other packages depending on > edict and kanjidic). > > I've uploaded the new edic

ITA: zed -- Powerful, multipurpose, configurable text

2003-07-20 Thread Sergio Suarez
I have a new package for zed (1.0.5-9) here: htpp://80.34.20.197 and I need a sponsor for check it and upload it Zed is a powerfull,multipurpose text editor: - Can use ANY key sequence (e.g. define a block with shift-arrow) even on the console. - Intelligent screen update (NOT using the s

Re: RFS since

2003-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:08:30PM +1000, AnĂ­bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: [...] > To test your 'closes:' statement (there are other variations) against > the regular expression, do something like this: > > echo 'closes: #201365' | perl -ne 'print "ok\n" if > /closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bu

ITA: zed -- Powerful, multipurpose, configurable text

2003-07-20 Thread Sergio Suarez
I have a new package for zed (1.0.5-9) here: htpp://80.34.20.197 and I need a sponsor for check it and upload it Zed is a powerfull,multipurpose text editor: - Can use ANY key sequence (e.g. define a block with shift-arrow) even on the console. - Intelligent screen update (NOT using the s