Re: How do I get libtool to use g++?

2003-05-31 Thread James Troup
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> sed -e 's/CC="gcc"/CC="g++"/g' libtool > lt.tmp && mv -f lt.tmp libtool >> >> to force it. What's the right way to get libstdc++ linked in to shared >> libraries of C++ code? The package uses autoconf, automake, libtool, etc. > > Use -lstdc++ [...]? N

Re: Request for sponsor/mentor: albatross

2003-05-31 Thread Fabian Fagerholm
On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 06:17, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On 16 May 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > > I've packaged the Albatross Web Toolkit. I've filed an ITP: Bug #193574. > > Once you've got it to the quality of wanting it in Debian, contact me and > we'll work something out. It certainly looks

Re: How do I get libtool to use g++?

2003-05-31 Thread Brian Nelson
Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I recently had a bug (193950) filed against one of my packages because the > shared libraries had "undefined non-weak symbols" - libstdc++ was not being > linked in. I resolved it with what I consider a gruesome hack. I discovered > that forcing libtool t

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Mike Schacht wrote: > This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows > that some of the machines allow access by "all". There is no further > explanation of who qualifies as "all", or how someone who is "all" can > get access. > > The debian-admin list is given at the Ad

Re: bug reports

2003-05-31 Thread Neil Roeth
On May 30, Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Neil Roeth wrote: > > Thanks for the hints. I should have been more clear - I have no problem > > getting the main page, i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are > > links in that page to bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug= for each > > bug,

Re: bug reports

2003-05-31 Thread Joey Hess
Neil Roeth wrote: > Thanks for the hints. I should have been more clear - I have no problem > getting the main page, i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are > links in that page to bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug= for each > bug, and I want to get each of those as a local web page, too. That

Re: problems with upstream authors and the naming of perl modules

2003-05-31 Thread Joey Hess
I really think this should go to the debian-perl list so I'm sending it there. The libc-include-perl example below is one of the best arguments I've seen for changing the perl module naming scheme. It's a pity that we didn't think it through more before deciding on it. IIRC we just took the example

How do I get libtool to use g++?

2003-05-31 Thread Neil Roeth
I recently had a bug (193950) filed against one of my packages because the shared libraries had "undefined non-weak symbols" - libstdc++ was not being linked in. I resolved it with what I consider a gruesome hack. I discovered that forcing libtool to use g++ while linking would automatically link

Re: How do I get libtool to use g++?

2003-05-31 Thread James Troup
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> sed -e 's/CC="gcc"/CC="g++"/g' libtool > lt.tmp && mv -f lt.tmp libtool >> >> to force it. What's the right way to get libstdc++ linked in to shared >> libraries of C++ code? The package uses autoconf, automake, libtool, etc. > > Use -lstdc++ [...]? N

Re: Request for sponsor/mentor: albatross

2003-05-31 Thread Fabian Fagerholm
On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 06:17, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On 16 May 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > > I've packaged the Albatross Web Toolkit. I've filed an ITP: Bug #193574. > > Once you've got it to the quality of wanting it in Debian, contact me and > we'll work something out. It certainly looks

Re: How do I get libtool to use g++?

2003-05-31 Thread Brian Nelson
Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I recently had a bug (193950) filed against one of my packages because the > shared libraries had "undefined non-weak symbols" - libstdc++ was not being > linked in. I resolved it with what I consider a gruesome hack. I discovered > that forcing libtool t

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Mike Schacht wrote: > This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows > that some of the machines allow access by "all". There is no further > explanation of who qualifies as "all", or how someone who is "all" can > get access. > > The debian-admin list is given at the Ad