On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> Since stable base packages (in addition to effective developmen tools!) are
> the most important factor in making a stable OS, it would be good to have
> more work concentrated on them.
As Colin has already pointed out, bugs.qa.debian.org can give list
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-13 02:25]:
> The fact that pkgreport.cgi doesn't display them is a bug in
> debbugs, not
Well, then we can still blame you. :-P
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 01:02:05AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Have you tried http://bugs.qa.debian.org/?
>
> http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/standard.cgi says that bison has 3
> serious bugs.
>
> Page discarded as useless du
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-13 02:25]:
> The fact that pkgreport.cgi doesn't display them is a bug in
> debbugs, not
Well, then we can still blame you. :-P
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 04:56:46PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > I.e. aside from trying to convince someone that Debian would benefit from
> > having you around (I, for one, have an advocate already) or fixing bugs
> > from
> > pac
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 01:02:05AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Have you tried http://bugs.qa.debian.org/?
>
> http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/standard.cgi says that bison has 3
> serious bugs.
>
> Page discarded as useless du
Package(s): eli, eli-doc
Version:4.4.0
Upstream: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:http://eli-project.sourceforge.net/
Licence:GPL
eli is a set of tools for compiler construction (lexer, parser
generators, handling of semantic analysis with AGs, commandline
parser generator, debugging tools
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 04:56:46PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > I.e. aside from trying to convince someone that Debian would benefit from
> > having you around (I, for one, have an advocate already) or fixing bugs from
> > packages
Package(s): eli, eli-doc
Version:4.4.0
Upstream: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:http://eli-project.sourceforge.net/
Licence:GPL
eli is a set of tools for compiler construction (lexer, parser
generators, handling of semantic analysis with AGs, commandline
parser generator, debugging tools
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 01:22:03PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Daniel Pecos wrote:
>
> > Well, I ask for an advocate because of debian web page says this:
> >
..
>
> > It's really hard to do the process to be a DD, so please, don't talk
> > so hardly to pe
Hallo !
Ich wuste nicht so recht zu welcher MAiling List ich posten sollte,
deswegn habe ich erstmal die hier genommen
Kann mir jemand bei der Konfiguration von PAM helfen ? Ich möchte nicht
nur das sich die normalen UNIX user an mein System anmelden können,
sonder AUCH die user, die ich
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 04:56:46PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> I.e. aside from trying to convince someone that Debian would benefit from
> having you around (I, for one, have an advocate already) or fixing bugs from
> packages you are interested in:
>
>which bugs (and more importantly) _in_
> > + There are so many packages and so many bugs that it's really hard to
> >say where to start.
>
> this is an upstream bug I wont fix anytime soon, so here is something
> to start with:
> http://bugs.debian.org/71419
> webcheck: Could it be internationalized?
Tips like this are good of cou
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 02:41:53PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 11:36:15AM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> >I've been playing around with an idea of making a nice local
> >frontend for BTS by adding a procmail filter that would intercept
> >incoming mail. But:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 11:36:15AM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > unless they can give some demonstration that they're into more than just
> > making packages. Fixing bugs, for instance.
>
> This advice is quite usual on this list. I think there are
Bill Allombert wrote:
> What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
The clean way is build from an exported tree using cvs-buildpackage.
AFAIK it works the same for native as for non-native packages.
The quic
Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the developers' reference says in 6.4:
>
> | Standard input and output may be redirected (e.g. into pipes) for
> | logging purposes, so don't rely on them being a tty.
>
> So far, so good. But is it o.k. if the script itself performs
> redirections? For example some
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030412 13:05]:
> You've got the release-critical bug list, which is a good place to
> start.
Not really. Most bugs need much knowledge of debian (or the policy),
or work on non-i386-platforms, or a recompilation, or mixed. For the
last two things it's very much
> Pointing someone at a package they're not interested in won't work, either,
> though. Dunno what the solution is, but surely every prospective DD can
> find enough packages they use on a regular basis and find bugs in them?
I currently have 1104 packages installed maybe 15 on which I'm even som
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 11:36:15AM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> This advice is quite usual on this list. I think there are a few reasons why
> it's not as common thing for non-DDs to do as it maybe could be:
>
> + There are so many packages and so many bugs that it's really hard to
>say wher
* Jarno Elonen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030412 11:20]:
> > unless they can give some demonstration that they're into more than just
> > making packages. Fixing bugs, for instance.
> This advice is quite usual on this list. I think there are a few reasons why
> it's not as common thing for non-DDs to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > unless they can give some demonstration that they're into more than just
> > making packages. Fixing bugs, for instance.
>
> This advice is quite usual on this list. I think there are a few reasons why
> it's not as common thing for non-DDs to do as
At 00:55 12/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:24:33AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> - Debconfig-fied installation
> When the postinst script launches the daemon ( by means of
> /etc/init.d/webcdwriter ), dpkg just
> unless they can give some demonstration that they're into more than just
> making packages. Fixing bugs, for instance.
This advice is quite usual on this list. I think there are a few reasons why
it's not as common thing for non-DDs to do as it maybe could be:
+ There are so many packages an
Rene Tschirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Now I hope to get an experienced advocate. :-)
>> Can you make the .dsc and .diff.gz files available publicly somewhere?
>
> Sure. Both files are availabe at
> http://lava.cs.tu-berlin.de/~pooh/debian/dvdauth
25 matches
Mail list logo
