Hi,
I'm willing to sponsor you, also since I have a work-related interest in TWiki.
Thanks,
Ardo
Sven Dowideit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> I'm still hoping that a DD will sponsor my updates to the twiki package.
> cheers
> sven
>
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 00:51, [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Daniel Pecos wrote:
> Well, I ask for an advocate because of debian web page says this:
>
> " ...
> Applicants can find a sponsor by sending an email to
>describing their package and
> asking for a sponsor. Developers can find more
Hello again.
I'm still hoping that a DD will sponsor my updates to the twiki package.
cheers
sven
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 00:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, if someone could please sponsor Sven that would be appreciated; I
> get enough email to indicate that the twiki package is just useful
> e
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:46:31PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> "B. Douglas Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Man autoconf is a hassle. I love autotools / hate m4. My brain hurts
> > everytime I mess with aclocal.m4.
>
> You should never, ever, touch aclocal.m4. It's completely generated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:24:33AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> - Debconfig-fied installation
> When the postinst script launches the daemon ( by means of
> /etc/init.d/webcdwriter ), dpkg just 'hangs', waiting for the daemon.
Try to
Hi all fellow Debian users! ( just subscribed )
Wanting to become a Debian Developer, i took the 'challenge' from the WNPP
list to package WebCDwriter [
http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ].
Now, sometime later, I have the package mostly finished, including:
- Two
> No, I think you want /usr/share/doc//examples:
>
> greenwood$ find /usr/share/doc -name "examples" -type d -print | wc --lines
> 190
> greenwood$
Yeah, you're right - typo on my part, sorry. My fingers are faster than
my brain on Fridays. :-)
KEN
pgp4L7HShhgtk.pgp
Description: PGP signa
No, I think you want /usr/share/doc//examples:
greenwood$ find /usr/share/doc -name "examples" -type d -print | wc --lines
190
greenwood$
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > I am packaging the Net::NBName modu
Hello. If anyone see poldek application to manage packages in PLD
distribution ? It can bo found at: http://poldek.pld.org.pl/.
It is very useful, and it has got some lovely feature - like tab
completition... If anyone wanna port it to deb and debian ? It is very
useful application.
--
(\
> I am packaging the Net::NBName module from CPAN. This module contains
> some example scripts which are installed using the 'EXE_FILES' option
> to MakeMaker. Should I install these in /usr/bin,
> /usr/share/doc/examples or not at all? (And if not /usr/bin, how
> should I change their installat
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 02:17:18PM +0200, Daniel Pecos wrote:
> Well, I ask for an advocate because of debian web page says this:
> " ...
> Applicants can find a sponsor by sending an email to
>describing their package and
> asking for a sponsor. Develo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all guys,
my actual sponsor is on vac and i would like get a new
version of the pkg in main to close a bug and to allign to the latest
policies. I will really appreciate if someone can take care of it.
Pkg is at: http://www.fabbion
I am packaging the Net::NBName module from CPAN. This module contains some
example scripts which are installed using the 'EXE_FILES' option to
MakeMaker. Should I install these in /usr/bin, /usr/share/doc/examples or
not at all? (And if not /usr/bin, how should I change their installation
locati
Hi,
the developers' reference says in 6.4:
| Standard input and output may be redirected (e.g. into pipes) for
| logging purposes, so don't rely on them being a tty.
So far, so good. But is it o.k. if the script itself performs
redirections? For example something like the following in postinst:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> > > The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
Hi again!
> ...
>
> OK, once and for all, I'm going to put down my interpretation of the purpose
> of the advocate in the NM process. If anyone thinks differently, please
> speak up.
>
> The advocate is a Debian Developer (DD) who knows the work of the
> prospective maintainer, and is willing to
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 02:07:51PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> >>I think "-ICVS" passed to dpkg-buildpackage does the trick. See the man
> >>page of
> >>dpkg-source for details.
> > No, this will remove the CVS dirs from the diff, but there are no diffs
> > since this a
Bill Allombert wrote:
>>I think "-ICVS" passed to dpkg-buildpackage does the trick. See the man page
>>of
>>dpkg-source for details.
> No, this will remove the CVS dirs from the diff, but there are no diffs
> since this a native package.
> I comtemplated switching to non-native for that reason but
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:55:52PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> > The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
>
> cvs-buildpackage
Could you give more detail
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
cvs-buildpackage
--
bye Joerg
(Irgendwo von heise.de):
Jesus war ein typischer Student:
- Lebte bis er 30 war bei den
En réponse à Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all,
>
> What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
Isn't "cvs export" what you need?
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> > The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
> I think "-ICVS" passed to dpkg-buildpackage does the tr
Hi Bill,
Bill Allombert wrote:
> What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
I think "-ICVS" passed to dpkg-buildpackage does the trick. See the man page of
dpkg-source for details.
Cheers
T.
pgphjE2qzTN1C
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Please file a bug against www.debian.org asking them to grab revision
> 1.5 of html/Developer.html.in from debbugs.
Thanks, done. #188563.
cu andreas
Hello all,
What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
Cheer,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Please CC me)
25 matches
Mail list logo