Colin Watson wrote:
> It's a false positive, yes. Please file it as a bug against lintian
> (also compare #179614).
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real packages
and none of them were virtual. I could not ded
Colin Watson wrote:
> It's a false positive, yes. Please file it as a bug against lintian
> (also compare #179614).
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real packages
and none of them were virtual. I could not ded
Bob,
Can you come down here and pick up your
mangy cat. It keeps using the bathroom
all over my new bathroom tiles.
please dont resend your message twice.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
> but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
> that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
it s
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This may be a false positive, since you should not need an alternative
> > for mixed virtual packages.
>
> Policy Manual section "2.3.5 Virtual packages" says nothing about mixed
> virtual packages. Googling
Bob,
Can you come down here and pick up your
mangy cat. It keeps using the bathroom
all over my new bathroom tiles.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please dont resend your message twice.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
> but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
> that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
it s
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This may be a false positive, since you should not need an alternative
> > for mixed virtual packages.
>
> Policy Manual section "2.3.5 Virtual packages" says nothing about mixed
> virtual packages. Googling
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> In this case I want the "real" rsh-client package and not one of the
> virtuals such as ssh. I also have ssh installed. Therefore I do not
> want to list this as "ssh | rsh-client" because that would not be the
> right thing. Therefor
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Why does it think rsh-client is a virtual package?
>
> It is a mixed virtual package. There is a real package rsh-client, but also
> several other packages provide rsh-client (apt-cache showpkg rsh-client).
Aha! Interesting. Since I *knew* that rsh-client was a real p
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> In this case I want the "real" rsh-client package and not one of the
> virtuals such as ssh. I also have ssh installed. Therefore I do not
> want to list this as "ssh | rsh-client" because that would not be the
> right thing. Therefor
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Why does it think rsh-client is a virtual package?
>
> It is a mixed virtual package. There is a real package rsh-client, but also
> several other packages provide rsh-client (apt-cache showpkg rsh-client).
Aha! Interesting. Since I *knew* that rsh-client was a real p
Hi there!
I'm looking for a sponser for the following package (ITP is #180269):
Package name: jprojecttimer
Version : 0.0.7-2
Upstream Author : Remi POUJEAUX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jprojecttimer
License : GPL
Descripti
Hi there!
I'm looking for a sponser for the following package (ITP is #180269):
Package name: jprojecttimer
Version : 0.0.7-2
Upstream Author : Remi POUJEAUX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jprojecttimer
License : GPL
Descripti
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 12:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> > ./configure --admin $ADMIN --domain $DOMAIN --bindir /usr/sbin
> > --notify $NOTIFY --install
> >
> > The problem is that when it gets to the above configure line (which
> > expects user input), it just hangs whereas if I run it from the comma
Hi!
my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
What I have to do ?
thanks,
Andrea
--
Andrea Bedini (beb0s) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint = A66F EB66
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 12:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> > ./configure --admin $ADMIN --domain $DOMAIN --bindir /usr/sbin
> > --notify $NOTIFY --install
> >
> > The problem is that when it gets to the above configure line (which
> > expects user input), it just hangs whereas if I run it from the comma
Hi!
my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
What I have to do ?
thanks,
Andrea
--
Andrea Bedini (beb0s) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint = A66F EB66
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am packaging a direct connect client for linux. Since there is also package
called dcgui on debian I had little discussion on #debian-kde channel. With
help of some people there I decided to call my packages as dcgui-qt, libdc0
and libdc0-de
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 02:57:33 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Preferred alternatives for virtual packages should come first, not
> second.
Yeah, could have sworn :)
pgpZiqz4dLNCa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am packaging a direct connect client for linux. Since there is also package
called dcgui on debian I had little discussion on #debian-kde channel. With
help of some people there I decided to call my packages as dcgui-qt, libdc0
and libdc0-de
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 02:57:33 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Preferred alternatives for virtual packages should come first, not
> second.
Yeah, could have sworn :)
msg08560/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
22 matches
Mail list logo
