On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:50:44PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Pronovici said:
> > > I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> > > program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> > > looking like -DR7.10. dh_ma
Kenneth Pronovici said:
> > I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> > program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> > looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
> > itself trivial to work around, but it made me stop and wonder i
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Pronovici said:
> > I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> > program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> > looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
> > itself trivial to work around, but
> I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
> itself trivial to work around, but it made me stop and wonder if this
> is because the versioni
Hello all,
I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
itself trivial to work around, but it made me stop and wonder if this
is because the versio
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:50:44PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Pronovici said:
> > > I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> > > program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> > > looking like -DR7.10. dh_ma
Kenneth Pronovici said:
> > I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> > program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> > looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
> > itself trivial to work around, but it made me stop and wonder i
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Pronovici said:
> > I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> > program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> > looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
> > itself trivial to work around, but
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
as I can see, this is a recurrent question (I've made the same question
a year ago). I have a proposal:
As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I propose
the creation of a document to be available at
http://www.debian.org/devel explaining about this two scripts.
It wou
> I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
> program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
> looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
> itself trivial to work around, but it made me stop and wonder if this
> is because the versioni
Hello all,
I have a question about how to proceed. I am considering packaging a
program, and it uses a nonstandard versioning scheme. It ends up
looking like -DR7.10. dh_make doesn't parse this - this in
itself trivial to work around, but it made me stop and wonder if this
is because the versio
Hi,
as I can see, this is a recurrent question (I've made the same question
a year ago). I have a proposal:
As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I propose
the creation of a document to be available at
http://www.debian.org/devel explaining about this two scripts.
It wou
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
> was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
> both?
debmake was definitely first, then came dh-make. dh-make was created
because maintain
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
> was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
> both?
debmake was definitely first, then came dh-make. dh-make was created
because maintain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> "Nik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hallo!
> >
> > ich bin einer der maintainer des selflinux projekts. wir würden gerne mit
> > unserem .deb file auf den offiziellen debian mirr
"Nik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hallo!
>
> ich bin einer der maintainer des selflinux projekts. wir würden gerne mit
> unserem .deb file auf den offiziellen debian mirrors vertreten sein.
>
>
To get an actual audience on debian-mentors, you should be posting in
English.
Grüsse, Andi
--
And
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> I just noticed foobillard 2.4 has been released, so I will update my
> packages sometime today.
They are up to date now:
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/i386 ./
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/powerpc ./
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> "Nik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hallo!
> >
> > ich bin einer der maintainer des selflinux projekts. wir würden gerne mit
> > unserem .deb file auf den offiziellen debian mir
"Nik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hallo!
>
> ich bin einer der maintainer des selflinux projekts. wir würden gerne mit
> unserem .deb file auf den offiziellen debian mirrors vertreten sein.
>
>
To get an actual audience on debian-mentors, you should be posting in
English.
Grüsse, Andi
--
And
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> I just noticed foobillard 2.4 has been released, so I will update my
> packages sometime today.
They are up to date now:
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/i386 ./
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/powerpc ./
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 02:31:54AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
>
> it's great that you're packaging foobillard. What kind of powerpc box do
> you have? In case it's one with a Radeon chip with an R100 core and a
> TCL unit, and you're using my dri-trunk packages,
I have an iboo
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 02:31:54AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
>
> it's great that you're packaging foobillard. What kind of powerpc box do
> you have? In case it's one with a Radeon chip with an R100 core and a
> TCL unit, and you're using my dri-trunk packages,
I have an iboo
24 matches
Mail list logo
