onsdagen den 8 januari 2003 18.57 skrev Raphael Hertzog:
> apt-get -o dpkg::options::="--force-confmiss"
>
> You can put it once for all in a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/.
> Check man apt.conf for details.
That is the individual solution when the trouble is there. But is there no way
to make the
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts |
> > ttf-larabie-deco
>
> That is indeed the same thing. This means my original requirement is not
> entirely what I want either. What I mean is "ttf-freefont is suf
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-deco
>
> That is indeed the same thing. This means my original requirement is not
> entirely what I want either. What I mean is "ttf-freefont is sufficie
On Thursday 09 January 2003 8:35 pm, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Well, since the fonts are already packaged in non-free (ttf-larabie-*), I
> assumed this judgement to be valid.
Absolutely.. and this phrase confirms it.
> > 2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS.
> >
> > a) Do not alt
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:07:51PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote:
> It seems to me that the fonts included with foobilliard aren't _exactly_
> non-free, but perhaps debian-legal should look over the license to make a
> final decision on the DFSG-ness of the fonts; I might be wrong, but a
> cursory glance
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:50:19PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:22:09PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
> > or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
> > express this in the De
It seems to me that the fonts included with foobilliard aren't _exactly_
non-free, but perhaps debian-legal should look over the license to make a
final decision on the DFSG-ness of the fonts; I might be wrong, but a
cursory glance over the README.FONTS file in foobilliard gives me the
feeling that
Hi, I would like to maintain catdvi (RFA: #174850) and I need a sponsor.
You can see a preliminary version of my package at :
http://beb0s.shacknet.nu/~andrea/debian/
Note that it may have some bugs since I don't have jet finished to read
the policy.
thanks,
andrea (beb0s)
--
, , '
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:22:09PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
> or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
> express this in the Depends: field ?
Apply Boolean algebra to 'ttf-freefonts | (ttf-larabie
Hi,
The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
express this in the Depends: field ?
Frank
On Thursday 09 January 2003 8:35 pm, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Well, since the fonts are already packaged in non-free (ttf-larabie-*), I
> assumed this judgement to be valid.
Absolutely.. and this phrase confirms it.
> > 2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS.
> >
> > a) Do not alt
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:07:51PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote:
> It seems to me that the fonts included with foobilliard aren't _exactly_
> non-free, but perhaps debian-legal should look over the license to make a
> final decision on the DFSG-ness of the fonts; I might be wrong, but a
> cursory glance
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:50:19PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:22:09PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
> > or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
> > express this in the De
It seems to me that the fonts included with foobilliard aren't _exactly_
non-free, but perhaps debian-legal should look over the license to make a
final decision on the DFSG-ness of the fonts; I might be wrong, but a
cursory glance over the README.FONTS file in foobilliard gives me the
feeling that
Hi, I would like to maintain catdvi (RFA: #174850) and I need a sponsor.
You can see a preliminary version of my package at :
http://beb0s.shacknet.nu/~andrea/debian/
Note that it may have some bugs since I don't have jet finished to read
the policy.
thanks,
andrea (beb0s)
--
, , '
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:22:09PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
> or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
> express this in the Depends: field ?
Apply Boolean algebra to 'ttf-freefonts | (ttf-larabie
Hi,
The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
express this in the Depends: field ?
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:38:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > This means that either :
> > a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> > b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> >
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:38:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > This means that either :
> > a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> > b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> >
19 matches
Mail list logo
