Re: source name change

2002-12-08 Thread Leo Costela
On Dom, 2002-12-08 at 13:06, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi mentors, > I have to change the a package source name because it was changed > upstream and the old one is no longer pertinent. > > The new package will provide some binary packages that were provided by > the provious one and some addi

Re: source name change

2002-12-08 Thread Leo Costela
On Dom, 2002-12-08 at 13:06, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi mentors, > I have to change the a package source name because it was changed > upstream and the old one is no longer pertinent. > > The new package will provide some binary packages that were provided by > the provious one and some addi

Re: source name change

2002-12-08 Thread James Troup
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should I ask for the removal of the old one and the upload the new > one? or should I better mail directly the ftp maintainers > explaining the situation so that they can perform the change in a > single run? Upload the new one and then file a bug

source name change

2002-12-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Hi mentors, I have to change the a package source name because it was changed upstream and the old one is no longer pertinent. The new package will provide some binary packages that were provided by the provious one and some additional binary packages. Which is the good(TM) procedure to perform

Re: duplicate depends relations

2002-12-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! How does one best handle this situation: > > E: lam-runtime: package-has-a-duplicate-relation ssh | rsh-client, ssh | > rsh-server > > i.e. lam-runtime neest either *both* rsh-client and rsh-server, or ssh. What version

duplicate depends relations

2002-12-08 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! How does one best handle this situation: E: lam-runtime: package-has-a-duplicate-relation ssh | rsh-client, ssh | rsh-server i.e. lam-runtime neest either *both* rsh-client and rsh-server, or ssh. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: source name change

2002-12-08 Thread James Troup
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should I ask for the removal of the old one and the upload the new > one? or should I better mail directly the ftp maintainers > explaining the situation so that they can perform the change in a > single run? Upload the new one and then file a bug

source name change

2002-12-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Hi mentors, I have to change the a package source name because it was changed upstream and the old one is no longer pertinent. The new package will provide some binary packages that were provided by the provious one and some additional binary packages. Which is the good(TM) procedure to perform

Re: duplicate depends relations

2002-12-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! How does one best handle this situation: > > E: lam-runtime: package-has-a-duplicate-relation ssh | rsh-client, ssh | rsh-server > > i.e. lam-runtime neest either *both* rsh-client and rsh-server, or ssh. What version of

duplicate depends relations

2002-12-08 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! How does one best handle this situation: E: lam-runtime: package-has-a-duplicate-relation ssh | rsh-client, ssh | rsh-server i.e. lam-runtime neest either *both* rsh-client and rsh-server, or ssh. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTE