Is anyone maintaining blender? I mailed the maintainer and never got a
response.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:06:57PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:06:29AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> SL> Tcl is Tcl, so I wouldn't follow its example for, well... anything.
>
> Except that Alicq is written entirely in Tcl, so I have to at least
> respect the choi
Is anyone maintaining blender? I mailed the maintainer and never got a
response.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:06:57PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:06:29AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> SL> Tcl is Tcl, so I wouldn't follow its example for, well... anything.
>
> Except that Alicq is written entirely in Tcl, so I have to at least
> respect the choi
> "Kenneth" == Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kenneth> The gij java runtime would not work for my test case (just
Kenneth> some simple server/client pairs that come with the nbio
Kenneth> distribution)
Bummer.
Kenneth> The error I got from gij (below my signature) it a little
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:45:41PM +0100, Fabrizio Lippolis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build a package for a library, both static and shared.
> The library gets built with configure, make and make install which I
> have seen are contained in the rules file. When I issue the command
> dpkg-
Hello,
I am trying to build a package for a library, both static and shared.
The library gets built with configure, make and make install which I
have seen are contained in the rules file. When I issue the command
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot everything seems to work fine and the deb
files are bui
> "Kenneth" == Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kenneth> The gij java runtime would not work for my test case (just
Kenneth> some simple server/client pairs that come with the nbio
Kenneth> distribution)
Bummer.
Kenneth> The error I got from gij (below my signature) it a little
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:45:41PM +0100, Fabrizio Lippolis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build a package for a library, both static and shared.
> The library gets built with configure, make and make install which I
> have seen are contained in the rules file. When I issue the command
> dpkg-
Hello,
I am trying to build a package for a library, both static and shared.
The library gets built with configure, make and make install which I
have seen are contained in the rules file. When I issue the command
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot everything seems to work fine and the deb
files are bui
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 10:12, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I think this is still topical to both debian-mentors and debian-java.
> Someone tell me if they want it moved to one or the other...]
>
> > gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> > gij (GNU Interprete
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 10:12, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I think this is still topical to both debian-mentors and debian-java.
> Someone tell me if they want it moved to one or the other...]
>
> > gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> > gij (GNU Interprete
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:12:52AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I think this is still topical to both debian-mentors and debian-java.
> Someone tell me if they want it moved to one or the other...]
>
> > gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> > gij (GNU In
[I think this is still topical to both debian-mentors and debian-java.
Someone tell me if they want it moved to one or the other...]
> gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> gij (GNU Interpreter for Java) for interpreting bytecode. What exactly
> doesn't work wi
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:12:52AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I think this is still topical to both debian-mentors and debian-java.
> Someone tell me if they want it moved to one or the other...]
>
> > gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> > gij (GNU In
[I think this is still topical to both debian-mentors and debian-java.
Someone tell me if they want it moved to one or the other...]
> gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> gij (GNU Interpreter for Java) for interpreting bytecode. What exactly
> doesn't work wi
16 matches
Mail list logo