On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:38:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:02:12PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > "doclifter was written under Python 2.2a1. It will not work under
> > Python 1.5.2, and may not work under 2.1. Upgrade, it will be good for
> > you."
>
> IMO th
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:02:12PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> "doclifter was written under Python 2.2a1. It will not work under
> Python 1.5.2, and may not work under 2.1. Upgrade, it will be good for
> you."
IMO this means that RMS had used some features that aren't available in
versions earli
Hi all,
I'm trying to package up the above linux kernel module, but having a few
problems, and wondered if anyone would be willing to assist? I've looked
at a few of the other debianised modules, but they seems overly
complicated in comparison.
Are there any quite simple examples that people can
Hi,
At "deb http://www.burtonini.com/debian /" are the following packages:
* desktop-file-utils 0.3-3
* doclifter 1.0.0-2
If a kind DD would like to check these updates and upload them, I'd be a
happy wanting-to-be-a-debian-developer. :)
MD5 checksums:
a1c8bcd648da58bfe0b142042292caa8 desktop
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:08:00PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 13:04, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
> >
> > ESR surely?
>
> Yes... whoops. Wro
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:52:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Why shouldn't env be used?
Its nothing that policy forbids, but its good for people like me who keeps
forgetting that I have local python versions for testing installed :)
> > It is always good to support the default python version.
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 12:52, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> But I guess that if upstream absolutely want to use a specific Python,
> there isn't any reason not to leave Depends: python2.2.
> I don't see any problem here.
The exact requirements are:
"doclifter was written under Python 2.2a1. It will not
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 13:04, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
>
> ESR surely?
Yes... whoops. Wrong uber-geek :)
>
> > However, lintian now moans as "python2.2" isn't a v
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
ESR surely?
> However, lintian now moans as "python2.2" isn't a valid Python
> interpreter. I'd say this is a bug (and I intend to report it in a
> minute)
I thin
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
> > claims that it requires Python 2.2, so the script calls "/usr/bin/env
> > python2.2" and
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
> claims that it requires Python 2.2, so the script calls "/usr/bin/env
> python2.2" and the package Requires: python2.2.
>
> However, lintian now moans as "python2
I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
claims that it requires Python 2.2, so the script calls "/usr/bin/env
python2.2" and the package Requires: python2.2.
However, lintian now moans as "python2.2" isn't a valid Python
interpreter. I'd say this is a bug (and I inte
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:38:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:02:12PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > "doclifter was written under Python 2.2a1. It will not work under
> > Python 1.5.2, and may not work under 2.1. Upgrade, it will be good for
> > you."
>
> IMO t
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:02:12PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> "doclifter was written under Python 2.2a1. It will not work under
> Python 1.5.2, and may not work under 2.1. Upgrade, it will be good for
> you."
IMO this means that RMS had used some features that aren't available in
versions earl
Hi all,
I'm trying to package up the above linux kernel module, but having a few
problems, and wondered if anyone would be willing to assist? I've looked
at a few of the other debianised modules, but they seems overly
complicated in comparison.
Are there any quite simple examples that people can
Hi,
At "deb http://www.burtonini.com/debian /" are the following packages:
* desktop-file-utils 0.3-3
* doclifter 1.0.0-2
If a kind DD would like to check these updates and upload them, I'd be a
happy wanting-to-be-a-debian-developer. :)
MD5 checksums:
a1c8bcd648da58bfe0b142042292caa8 deskto
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:08:00PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 13:04, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
> >
> > ESR surely?
>
> Yes... whoops. Wr
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:52:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Why shouldn't env be used?
Its nothing that policy forbids, but its good for people like me who keeps
forgetting that I have local python versions for testing installed :)
> > It is always good to support the default python version.
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 12:52, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> But I guess that if upstream absolutely want to use a specific Python,
> there isn't any reason not to leave Depends: python2.2.
> I don't see any problem here.
The exact requirements are:
"doclifter was written under Python 2.2a1. It will not
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 13:04, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
>
> ESR surely?
Yes... whoops. Wrong uber-geek :)
>
> > However, lintian now moans as "python2.2" isn't a
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
ESR surely?
> However, lintian now moans as "python2.2" isn't a valid Python
> interpreter. I'd say this is a bug (and I intend to report it in a
> minute)
I thi
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
> > claims that it requires Python 2.2, so the script calls "/usr/bin/env
> > python2.2" and
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
> claims that it requires Python 2.2, so the script calls "/usr/bin/env
> python2.2" and the package Requires: python2.2.
>
> However, lintian now moans as "python
I am the maintainer for doclifter, a Python 2.2 script. Upstream (RMS)
claims that it requires Python 2.2, so the script calls "/usr/bin/env
python2.2" and the package Requires: python2.2.
However, lintian now moans as "python2.2" isn't a valid Python
interpreter. I'd say this is a bug (and I int
24 matches
Mail list logo
