Re: Multiple compile of source (ie, different configure lines for each package)

2002-09-17 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
when there is no longer anything to take away. -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery Date: 18 Sep 2002 09:20:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 72 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charse

Multiple compile of source (ie, different configure lines for each package)

2002-09-17 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
I'm packaging Nagios. It builds tree packages from one source: 'nagios-text', 'nagios-pgsql' and 'nagios-mysql'. The differences is quite obvious: Compile the source three times, each time with different ./configure options. The problem I'm facing is that I want to 'scratch' the source after eac

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:42:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > > I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in > > question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, > > which has the bug

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote: > >Hello! > > Hi, > > > > >I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in > >question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, > >which has th

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Geert Stappers
At 21:42 +0200 9/17/02, Michael Banck wrote: >On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: >> I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in >> question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, >> which has the bug fixed. > >Well, you ca

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Geert Stappers
At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote: >Hello! Hi, > >I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in >question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, >which has the bug fixed. > >I have submitted the bug 14 days ago, after another week I tried t

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in > question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, > which has the bug fixed. Well, you can try to backport the fix to the current version if

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:42:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > > I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in > > question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, > > which has the bug

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote: > >Hello! > > Hi, > > > > >I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in > >question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, > >which has t

NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Oliver Kurth
Hello! I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, which has the bug fixed. I have submitted the bug 14 days ago, after another week I tried to contact the maintainer and told him that he can grab my

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Geert Stappers
At 21:42 +0200 9/17/02, Michael Banck wrote: >On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: >> I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in >> question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, >> which has the bug fixed. > >Well, you c

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Geert Stappers
At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote: >Hello! Hi, > >I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in >question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, >which has the bug fixed. > >I have submitted the bug 14 days ago, after another week I tried

Re: NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in > question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, > which has the bug fixed. Well, you can try to backport the fix to the current version i

NMU with new upstream

2002-09-17 Thread Oliver Kurth
Hello! I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version, which has the bug fixed. I have submitted the bug 14 days ago, after another week I tried to contact the maintainer and told him that he can grab m

全市最便宜的市话通,手机和CDMA(一个你不可不看的广告

2002-09-17 Thread
CDMA手机900元送1300话费(每分钟0。20元)= 现代1100市话通600元(含400话费 CDMA手机卡150元一张(含1000元话费)打市内电话相当于7分钱一分钟 SONY100市话通500元(送400话费 摩托罗拉老款手机120元一台 能上网的西门子3508手机430元 能上网的爱立信T29手机500元 市话通带机入台150元送400话费 详情请咨询26840989

全市最便宜的市话通,手机和CDMA(一个你不可不看的广告

2002-09-17 Thread =?gb2312?q?=D1=F9_
CDMAÊÖ»ú900ÔªËÍ1300»°·Ñ£¨Ã¿·ÖÖÓ0¡£20Ôª£©= ÏÖ´ú1100Êл°Í¨600Ôª£¨º¬400»°·Ñ CDMAÊÖ»ú¿¨150ÔªÒ»ÕÅ£¨º¬1000Ôª»°·Ñ£©´òÊÐÄڵ绰Ï൱ÓÚ7·ÖǮһ·ÖÖÓ SONY100Êл°Í¨500Ôª£¨ËÍ400»°·Ñ ĦÍÐÂÞÀ­ÀÏ¿îÊÖ»ú120Ԫһ̨ ÄÜÉÏÍøµÄÎ÷ÃÅ×Ó3508ÊÖ»ú430Ôª ÄÜÉÏÍøµÄ°®Á¢ÐÅT29ÊÖ»ú500Ôª Êл°Í¨´ø»úÈę̈150ÔªËÍ400»°·Ñ ÏêÇéÇë×Éѯ2684098