Re: Questian about Architecture

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:35:20PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to > prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures. > Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported > architectures for all the packages that m

Re: Questian about Architecture

2002-09-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:35, Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to > prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures. > Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported > architectures for all t

Questian about Architecture

2002-09-11 Thread Marco Kuhlmann
Dear mentors, I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures. Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported architectures for all the packages that my source package provides? It does not seem to be po

Re: Questian about Architecture

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:35:20PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to > prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures. > Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported > architectures for all the packages that

Re: Questian about Architecture

2002-09-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:35, Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to > prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures. > Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported > architectures for all

Questian about Architecture

2002-09-11 Thread Marco Kuhlmann
Dear mentors, I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures. Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported architectures for all the packages that my source package provides? It does not seem to be p

Re: substvar in Arch:

2002-09-11 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler, > that forces me to disable one of the architectures, like i did for ia64 > and powerpc, where the 3.04 native code

Re: substvar in Arch:

2002-09-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:40:04AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > on all archs having the compiler and fail on others. This should not > > prevent the package from going into testing or stable as long as no > > previous packa

Re: substvar in Arch:

2002-09-11 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler, > that forces me to disable one of the architectures, like i did for ia64 > and powerpc, where the 3.04 native cod

Re: substvar in Arch:

2002-09-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:40:04AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > on all archs having the compiler and fail on others. This should not > > prevent the package from going into testing or stable as long as no > > previous pack