Hello!
I need a sponsor for tcpreen:
Package: tcpreen
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 128
Maintainer: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.0.2-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
Description: Simple TCP re-engineering tool
TCPreen is a small tool for
Hi Moritz!
You wrote:
> With the release of a GPLed Windows Edonkey client (emule) and its
> reveal of the protocol mldonkey's upstream decided to do the same.
> I don't see any obstacle wrt mldonkey's level of freedom now.
Great! This really is good news.
--
Kind regards,
+--
Hello!
I need a sponsor for tcpreen:
Package: tcpreen
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 128
Maintainer: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.0.2-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
Description: Simple TCP re-engineering tool
TCPreen is a small tool fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> > Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> >> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> >> didn't.
> >
> > Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> > the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> > didn't.
No of cause I didn't read the RFP. I also didn't change the Bugs title
to
Hi Moritz!
You wrote:
> With the release of a GPLed Windows Edonkey client (emule) and its
> reveal of the protocol mldonkey's upstream decided to do the same.
> I don't see any obstacle wrt mldonkey's level of freedom now.
Great! This really is good news.
--
Kind regards,
+-
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
>> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
>> didn't.
>
> Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
Goswin,
Please accept my apologies for being offen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> > Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> >> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> >> didn't.
> >
> > Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> > the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> > didn't.
No of cause I didn't read the RFP. I also didn't change the Bugs title
to
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> didn't.
Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
With the release of a GPLed Windows Edonkey client (emule) and
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > > at
> >
> > Since mldonkey is
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
>> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
>> didn't.
>
> Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
Goswin,
Please accept my apologies for being offe
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> didn't.
Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
With the release of a GPLed Windows Edonkey client (emule) an
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > > at
> >
> > Since mldonkey i
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:07:36PM +0200, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 05 Sep à 13:02, Goswin Brederlow écrivait :
> > No, 100% GPL due to emule being GPL already makeing it pointless to
> > hide the core protocl.
>
> There have been some discussions in the savannah mailing lists ab
Dans un message du 05 Sep à 13:02, Goswin Brederlow écrivait :
> No, 100% GPL due to emule being GPL already makeing it pointless to
> hide the core protocl.
There have been some discussions in the savannah mailing lists about two
binary files in the distribution. Can you confirm that this issue i
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
>
> Since mldonkey is written in Objective Caml, I suggest you to have a
> look at the Debian Ocaml P
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
> >
> > rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
> >
> > If anyone here is intrested in testin
> ==
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:00:03 +0200
> From: Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: mldonkey needs sponsor
> ==
>
> It is going to non-free right ?
non-free? I think it's GPL and it's developed
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> at
Since mldonkey is written in Objective Caml, I suggest you to have a
look at the Debian Ocaml Packaging Policy, which you can find along with
the ocaml pac
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> at
>
> rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
>
> If anyone here is intrested in testing and sponsoring mldonkey let me
> know. Also feel free to ta
Hi,
I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
at
rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
If anyone here is intrested in testing and sponsoring mldonkey let me
know. Also feel free to take a look at the package, good comments are
allways appreciated.
MfG
Goswin
Hello!
I need sponsor(s) for my packages:
memtester: A utility for testing the memory subsystem
This is a new package. memtest is already in sysutils, but I agreed with
the maintatiner of sysutils, that my package will conflict with all versions
of sysutils up to the current (<= 1.3.8.5.1), and h
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:07:36PM +0200, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 05 Sep à 13:02, Goswin Brederlow écrivait :
> > No, 100% GPL due to emule being GPL already makeing it pointless to
> > hide the core protocl.
>
> There have been some discussions in the savannah mailing lists a
Dans un message du 05 Sep à 13:02, Goswin Brederlow écrivait :
> No, 100% GPL due to emule being GPL already makeing it pointless to
> hide the core protocl.
There have been some discussions in the savannah mailing lists about two
binary files in the distribution. Can you confirm that this issue
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
>
> Since mldonkey is written in Objective Caml, I suggest you to have a
> look at the Debian Ocaml
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
> >
> > rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
> >
> > If anyone here is intrested in testi
> ==
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:00:03 +0200
> From: Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mldonkey needs sponsor
> ==
>
> It is going to non-free right ?
non-free? I think it's GPL and it's developed on savannah..
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> at
Since mldonkey is written in Objective Caml, I suggest you to have a
look at the Debian Ocaml Packaging Policy, which you can find along with
the ocaml pa
The package is already in a "working" state, but I need to write
manpages etc for them.
deb http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/
deb-src http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/
If anyone agrees to sponsor this, you should know that I will be gone
for ab
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> at
>
> rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
>
> If anyone here is intrested in testing and sponsoring mldonkey let me
> know. Also feel free to t
Hi,
I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
at
rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
If anyone here is intrested in testing and sponsoring mldonkey let me
know. Also feel free to take a look at the package, good comments are
allways appreciated.
MfG
Goswi
Hello!
I need sponsor(s) for my packages:
memtester: A utility for testing the memory subsystem
This is a new package. memtest is already in sysutils, but I agreed with
the maintatiner of sysutils, that my package will conflict with all versions
of sysutils up to the current (<= 1.3.8.5.1), and
The package is already in a "working" state, but I need to write
manpages etc for them.
deb http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/
deb-src http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/
If anyone agrees to sponsor this, you should know that I will be gone
for a
34 matches
Mail list logo
