Re: architecture in script

2002-08-17 Thread Ian Zimmerman
itz> Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a itz> maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package, itz> which I obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output itz> of uname or arch, but that seems too ugly (and I don't even know itz> what all the

NewDiet - We Pay You!! - FANTASTIC WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM!!!

2002-08-17 Thread NewDiet
Title:    We Pay You!!  Lose Weight Like Crazy!!  Safe - 100% Ephedra Free!  Free Gifts!  http://www.drop-the-weight-for-good.com  

Re: architecture in script

2002-08-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:28:53PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a > maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package, which I > obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output of uname or arch, > but that seems

NewDiet - We Pay You!! - FANTASTIC WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM!!!

2002-08-17 Thread NewDiet
Title:    We Pay You!!  Lose Weight Like Crazy!!  Safe - 100% Ephedra Free!  Free Gifts!  http://www.drop-the-weight-for-good.com  

Re: architecture in script

2002-08-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:28:53PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a > maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package, which I > obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output of uname or arch, > but that seem

Re: nm.debian.org statistics buggy ?

2002-08-17 Thread Helios de Creisquer
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:04:04PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Helios de Creisquer wrote: > > Without any crystal ball, I am able to say that an applicant waiting > > since 3 months at this stage will have a total time of waiting superior > > to 3 mont

Re: Orig tarball naming

2002-08-17 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 16 August 2002 23:27, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:16:57 +0100, Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >On Friday 16 August 2002 18:10, Marc Haber wrote: > >> I am wondering how cvs-buildpackage fits into this. From what I

Re: nm.debian.org statistics buggy ?

2002-08-17 Thread Helios de Creisquer
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:04:04PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Helios de Creisquer wrote: > > Without any crystal ball, I am able to say that an applicant waiting > > since 3 months at this stage will have a total time of waiting superior > > to 3 mon

Re: Orig tarball naming

2002-08-17 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 16 August 2002 23:27, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:16:57 +0100, Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >On Friday 16 August 2002 18:10, Marc Haber wrote: > >> I am wondering how cvs-buildpackage fits into this. From what I

Re: nm.debian.org statistics buggy ?

2002-08-17 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Helios de Creisquer wrote: > Without any crystal ball, I am able to say that an applicant waiting > since 3 months at this stage will have a total time of waiting superior > to 3 months for this stage when his complete application will be done. > > AF

Re: nm.debian.org statistics buggy ?

2002-08-17 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:28:07PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > On Friday 16 Aug 2002 1:14 pm, Craig Small wrote: > > > The statistics are for the people who passed each checkpoint in the last > > three months. > > Rather at a tangent, but it appears from reading the archives of > debian-newmaint