Kernel module packaging

Is there a good tutorial/reference anywhere for how to package (Linux) kernel modules and source, in a way that works with make-kpkg's modules_image? -- - Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Packaging assistance required

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:22:33 +1000, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Can filesystem permissions be set for the files in the .deb or are they > supposed to be set by the postinstall script? You must set permissions of the files in .deb before you call dh_builddeb (or dpkg --build) in d

Re: Packaging assistance required

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:22:33 +1000, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Can filesystem permissions be set for the files in the .deb or are they > supposed to be set by the postinstall script? You must set permissions of the files in .deb before you call dh_builddeb (or dpkg --build) in

request for sponsor: guarddog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> recently agreed in private email to pass maintainership of guarddog (KDE firewall app) to me. I have using it for some time, and packaging it locally for nearly a month. Sam has removed the package from Wood

request for sponsor: guarddog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> recently agreed in private email to pass maintainership of guarddog (KDE firewall app) to me. I have using it for some time, and packaging it locally for nearly a month. Sam has removed the package from Woo

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED (me too)

Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. > Easy buthow do you solve the problem ? Using a version number thats >the woody and < the sid one? :) > Currently, I have: > testing: weex 2.6.1-4 > unstable: weex 2.6.1-5 2.6.1-4woody1?

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED (me too)

On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > >Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. > > Easy buthow do you solve the problem ? By uploading with a version number between the version currently in woody and the version currently in sid. Use 'dpkg --compare

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED (me too)

Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. Easy buthow do you solve the problem ? I had a similar problem but my package (weex) is still not uploaded to 'woody-proposed-updates'. Currently, I have: testing: weex 2.6.1-4 unstable: weex 2.6.1-5 And I tried the following packa

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrea Mennucc) writes: > I am trying to upload a package for a proposed updated to woody > can someone please tell me why I get this error? > (or point me to a doc)? Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. -- begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt bye, Joerg

de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED

hi I am trying to upload a package for a proposed updated to woody can someone please tell me why I get this error? (or point me to a doc)? thanks a. On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:17:20AM -0400, Debian Installer wrote: > > Rejected: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1.dsc: old version (0.9-5) in unstable <=

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED (me too)

Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. > Easy buthow do you solve the problem ? Using a version number thats >the woody and < the sid one? :) > Currently, I have: > testing: weex 2.6.1-4 > unstable: weex 2.6.1-5 2.6.1-4woody1

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED (me too)

On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > >Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. > > Easy buthow do you solve the problem ? By uploading with a version number between the version currently in woody and the version currently in sid. Use 'dpkg --compar

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED (me too)

> Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. Easy buthow do you solve the problem ? I had a similar problem but my package (weex) is still not uploaded to 'woody-proposed-updates'. Currently, I have: testing: weex 2.6.1-4 unstable: weex 2.6.1-5 And I tried the following pack

Re: de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrea Mennucc) writes: > I am trying to upload a package for a proposed updated to woody > can someone please tell me why I get this error? > (or point me to a doc)? Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. -- begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt bye, Joerg

de: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1_source.changes REJECTED

hi I am trying to upload a package for a proposed updated to woody can someone please tell me why I get this error? (or point me to a doc)? thanks a. On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:17:20AM -0400, Debian Installer wrote: > > Rejected: snmpkit_0.9-5.woody.1.dsc: old version (0.9-5) in unstable <

RFC: Myricom GM message passing system packaging

Hi deb-folks and sorry for the long post. After a quite long delay in packaging GM message passing system (see my ITP #114992), I'm going to build up the beast. Some issues I see: A. Sources include a modified old version of zlib - with the infamous security bug. Myrinet developers think (?)

RFC: Myricom GM message passing system packaging

Hi deb-folks and sorry for the long post. After a quite long delay in packaging GM message passing system (see my ITP #114992), I'm going to build up the beast. Some issues I see: A. Sources include a modified old version of zlib - with the infamous security bug. Myrinet developers think (?)

Packaging assistance required

Hello, I'm attempting to package some "stuff" (read on for details) and I'm after some assistance. I've already read the contents of the maint-guide package, some of the debian-policy package and a few other bits and pieces of documentation that are floating around. I have successfully (arguably)