I'm curious about how the auto-builders work, somehow
I didn't find enough info about them, except for buildd
(http://buildd.debian.org/).
My question is: how do I make my packages available for
all architectures?
(Or at least, as many as possible. :-)
Should I do something or does the auto-buil
I'm curious about how the auto-builders work, somehow
I didn't find enough info about them, except for buildd
(http://buildd.debian.org/).
My question is: how do I make my packages available for
all architectures?
(Or at least, as many as possible. :-)
Should I do something or does the auto-bui
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:24, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Looking at
> configure.ac, it really only requires GTK+2 and pspell, so I just added
> libgtk2.0-dev to the build-depends.
Hm, but it still appears to need libpspell-dev, which isn't in the
Build-Depends. If it's left out, my pbuilder build dies
* Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020716 13:58]:
> would like to get it signed. However, I'm currently bouncing between
> Appleton, WI and Omaha, NE, and so it's difficult to schedule anything
If you ever make it up near Minneapolis give me a ring. I'll try to
keep you in mind if I make it tow
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 01:58:06PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> I'm interested in becoming a Debian developer. I have several years of
> experience in using Debian, and about a year of experience in packaging
> and maintaining my own software, as well as some other software I find
> useful. I hav
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:24, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Looking at
> configure.ac, it really only requires GTK+2 and pspell, so I just added
> libgtk2.0-dev to the build-depends.
Hm, but it still appears to need libpspell-dev, which isn't in the
Build-Depends. If it's left out, my pbuilder build die
Hm, commenting out the dh_foo lines aren't against any policy, and many
packages do it - it's really just for reference in case they have to be
added later. There aren't any example debhelper files in the debian/
directory, only commented out lines in debian/rules. I know that
upstream should u
* Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020716 13:58]:
> would like to get it signed. However, I'm currently bouncing between
> Appleton, WI and Omaha, NE, and so it's difficult to schedule anything
If you ever make it up near Minneapolis give me a ring. I'll try to
keep you in mind if I make it to
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 10:36, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while
> and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a
> month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded
> updated packages which close the
ok... But i had did the way he said... Actually, the package was
simplified...
Em Seg, 2002-07-15 às 22:06, Colin Watson escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:59:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I received this bug report, and I'm a little confused of how to handle
> > it.
> >
> > My package
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 01:58:06PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> I'm interested in becoming a Debian developer. I have several years of
> experience in using Debian, and about a year of experience in packaging
> and maintaining my own software, as well as some other software I find
> useful. I ha
password.txt
Description: Binary data
Hm, commenting out the dh_foo lines aren't against any policy, and many
packages do it - it's really just for reference in case they have to be
added later. There aren't any example debhelper files in the debian/
directory, only commented out lines in debian/rules. I know that
upstream should
Hi all,
I'm interested in becoming a Debian developer. I have several years of
experience in using Debian, and about a year of experience in packaging
and maintaining my own software, as well as some other software I find
useful. I have my own APT archive available at
http://www.sacredchao.net/sof
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 10:36, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while
> and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a
> month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded
> updated packages which close th
ok... But i had did the way he said... Actually, the package was
simplified...
Em Seg, 2002-07-15 às 22:06, Colin Watson escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:59:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I received this bug report, and I'm a little confused of how to handle
> > it.
> >
> > My packag
password.txt
Description: Binary data
Hi all,
I'm interested in becoming a Debian developer. I have several years of
experience in using Debian, and about a year of experience in packaging
and maintaining my own software, as well as some other software I find
useful. I have my own APT archive available at
http://www.sacredchao.net/so
Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while
and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a
month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded
updated packages which close the ITP bug - I didn't increment the
revision, since that
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:36:32PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> I agree. My question was more on the lines of 'is the configure target
> mandatory in debian/rules?'
Not at all - it's just a convention (popularized by dh_make, I suspect).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTE
Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while
and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a
month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded
updated packages which close the ITP bug - I didn't increment the
revision, since tha
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:36:51PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > The problem or rather in the configuration process which uses autoconf.
> > It seems to me that I need to run ./configure twice, once with
> > PYTHON=python2.1 and the other one with PYTHON=python2.2
>
> How about this:
>
> build/p
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:36:32PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> I agree. My question was more on the lines of 'is the configure target
> mandatory in debian/rules?'
Not at all - it's just a convention (popularized by dh_make, I suspect).
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:36:51PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > The problem or rather in the configuration process which uses autoconf.
> > It seems to me that I need to run ./configure twice, once with
> > PYTHON=python2.1 and the other one with PYTHON=python2.2
>
> How about this:
>
> build/
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:03:41AM -0400, Philip S. Hempel wrote:
> My name is Philip Hempel, I am looking for someone that would be
> willing to sponser me for a package called MessageWall from
> http://messagewall.org.
> This package hase two libraries that it depends on. The first is
> libf
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:03:41AM -0400, Philip S. Hempel wrote:
> My name is Philip Hempel, I am looking for someone that would be
> willing to sponser me for a package called MessageWall from
> http://messagewall.org.
> This package hase two libraries that it depends on. The first is
> lib
26 matches
Mail list logo
