On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 10:01:14PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> The binary-common rule has lots of dh_* stuff there, including
> dh_compress. I decided that compressing the HTML files would be a bad
> idea, so I modified it to skip that one package using
the dh_compress man page says:
Hi,
I regularly use the template debian/rules file
/usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi2
that has binary-indep and binary-arch rules that both use a single
binary-common rule. The binary-common rule has lots of dh_* stuff
there, including dh_compress. I decided that compressing the
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2002 15:31:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146786: debhelper: deb packages should contain SONAME
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Sam Clegg wrote:
> Aren't dev packages supposed to contain the SONAME:
>
> libfoo0-dev (rather than libfoo-dev)
>
> And then:
>
> Conflicts: libfoo-dev
> Provides: libfoo-dev
>
> At least this is what the libpkg-guide says.
Why is this bug report filed on debhelper, which merely uses whateve
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> I'm only parsing `debian/control.in' with sed, to add
> `-$(UPSTREAM_VERSION)' suffixes to the library packages names, so that
> they are always correctly versioned, so I can't see it causing
> problems, since the parsing is done within debian
W liście z czw, 16-05-2002, godz. 22:09, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * having pyro and host conflict (but this annoys me since I need both
> > packages on my machine)
This is against Debian Policy. Look at http://bugs.debian.org/xnc for
example of such
6 matches
Mail list logo
