On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:48:28PM -0500, Chris AtLee wrote:
> If something optionally uses gnome, should the package include the
> .gnorba and .desktop files, or should a separate -gnome package be made?
Just include them, unless you are building two packages (with and without
GNOME support).
-
If something optionally uses gnome, should the package include the
.gnorba and .desktop files, or should a separate -gnome package be made?
Chris
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 11:17, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 02:56:29PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 11:41,
I figured it out... I started everything from scratch and that did
it.
next question...
I realize that it is basically a debian policy to seperate documentation
and binarys into seperate packages, so that people who don't want the
documentation don't have to install it. However, the policy m
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:48:28PM -0500, Chris AtLee wrote:
> If something optionally uses gnome, should the package include the
> .gnorba and .desktop files, or should a separate -gnome package be made?
Just include them, unless you are building two packages (with and without
GNOME support).
If something optionally uses gnome, should the package include the
.gnorba and .desktop files, or should a separate -gnome package be made?
Chris
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 11:17, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 02:56:29PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 11:41
I figured it out... I started everything from scratch and that did
it.
next question...
I realize that it is basically a debian policy to seperate documentation
and binarys into seperate packages, so that people who don't want the
documentation don't have to install it. However, the policy
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:28:23AM +0100, J?rgen H?gg wrote:
>
> I'm writing a program that (for my conveniance) is split up
> in several perl modules. These are put in my programs private
> directory, /usr/lib/ham, because they might some day
> interfere with other 'official' perl modules.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:04:21PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Even gurus fails, sometimes... ;-)
Paolo, IK5LGS
--
If Linux is not Unix then Windows are not Gates
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:28:23AM +0100, J?rgen H?gg wrote:
>
> I'm writing a program that (for my conveniance) is split up
> in several perl modules. These are put in my programs private
> directory, /usr/lib/ham, because they might some day
> interfere with other 'official' perl modules.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:04:21PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Even gurus fails, sometimes... ;-)
Paolo, IK5LGS
--
If Linux is not Unix then Windows are not Gates
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"David H. Askew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and fakeroot debian/rules binary, but neither produces a .changes
> file!
Again, what's the output from dpkg-buidpackage ?
> .. only errors/complaints reported from either process involve my lack
> of a pgp private key and ... which hasn't be
Hi!
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 23:49, David H. Askew wrote:
> I added a line in rules to the clean target...
>
> rebuilt with both dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
>
> and fakeroot debian/rules binary, but neither produces
a .changes
> file!
>
> .. only errors/complaints reported from either pro
Hi!
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 23:49, David H. Askew wrote:
> I added a line in rules to the clean target...
>
> rebuilt with both dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
>
> and fakeroot debian/rules binary, but neither produces
a .changes
> file!
>
> .. only errors/complaints reported from either pr
15 matches
Mail list logo
