Has anyone else gotten one of these? It arrived shortly after I sent a
message to -mentors, and a google search reveals a couple of similarly
random public postings to -mentors in December:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2001/debian-mentors-200112/msg00192.html
http://lists.debian.org/deb
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:17:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/ subdirectory
> inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package (a nearly
> unmodified dh_make generated package), I've rewritten it completely and
> have remov
Has anyone else gotten one of these? It arrived shortly after I sent a
message to -mentors, and a google search reveals a couple of similarly
random public postings to -mentors in December:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2001/debian-mentors-200112/msg00192.html
http://lists.debian.org/de
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:17:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/ subdirectory
> inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package (a nearly
> unmodified dh_make generated package), I've rewritten it completely and
> have remo
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:52:49AM +0100, Gaetano Paolone wrote:
>
> Lintian tells me this:
>
> W: php-gtk: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> ./usr/lib/php4/20010901/php_gtk.so /usr/X11R6/lib
Strangely enough, I had this problem yesterday.
I was told to:
- Get new libtool
- libtoolize --force
Hi,
I am packaging php-gtk.
Lintian tells me this:
W: php-gtk: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
./usr/lib/php4/20010901/php_gtk.so /usr/X11R6/lib
N:
N: The binary or shared library defines the `RPATH'. Usually this is a
N: bad thing. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like:
N:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:52:49AM +0100, Gaetano Paolone wrote:
>
> Lintian tells me this:
>
> W: php-gtk: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> ./usr/lib/php4/20010901/php_gtk.so /usr/X11R6/lib
Strangely enough, I had this problem yesterday.
I was told to:
- Get new libtool
- libtoolize --force
Hi,
I am packaging php-gtk.
Lintian tells me this:
W: php-gtk: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
./usr/lib/php4/20010901/php_gtk.so /usr/X11R6/lib
N:
N: The binary or shared library defines the `RPATH'. Usually this is a
N: bad thing. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like:
N:
> How to do this? (I ask mainly about the way of creating Sources.gz files) Are
> there any automagical tools for this?
apt-ftparchive
> The same about binary packages?
apt-ftparchive :)
pgpggW9khD7F1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello!
Suppose, I created a source package. Now I want to place it into
/usr/local/src/local-packges/dists/... (with the file structure similar to one
of Debian mirrors).
How to do this? (I ask mainly about the way of creating Sources.gz files) Are
there any automagical tools for this?
The sa
> How to do this? (I ask mainly about the way of creating Sources.gz files) Are
> there any automagical tools for this?
apt-ftparchive
> The same about binary packages?
apt-ftparchive :)
msg05476/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello!
Suppose, I created a source package. Now I want to place it into
/usr/local/src/local-packges/dists/... (with the file structure similar to one
of Debian mirrors).
How to do this? (I ask mainly about the way of creating Sources.gz files) Are
there any automagical tools for this?
The s
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:17:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/
> > subdirectory inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package
> > (a nearly unmodified dh_make generated packag
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:17:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/
> subdirectory inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package
> (a nearly unmodified dh_make generated package), I've rewritten it
> completely and have remove
Hi Debian mentors,
I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/
subdirectory inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package
(a nearly unmodified dh_make generated package), I've rewritten it
completely and have removed any occurrence of template .ex files as
well as READ
Hi list,
I have packaged DFBSee. It's an image viewer and video player using
DirectFB.
I also want to become a Debian Developer and help to port package to
Debian GNU/Hurd system.
Can someone verify my package and say me what's wrong ?
It's available at http://www.geffroy.info/free_software/debi
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:17:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/
> > subdirectory inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package
> > (a nearly unmodified dh_make generated packa
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:17:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/
> subdirectory inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package
> (a nearly unmodified dh_make generated package), I've rewritten it
> completely and have remov
Hi Debian mentors,
I'm packaging a piece of software that already has a debian/
subdirectory inside upstream sources. As it is a low quality package
(a nearly unmodified dh_make generated package), I've rewritten it
completely and have removed any occurrence of template .ex files as
well as REA
Hi list,
I have packaged DFBSee. It's an image viewer and video player using
DirectFB.
I also want to become a Debian Developer and help to port package to
Debian GNU/Hurd system.
Can someone verify my package and say me what's wrong ?
It's available at http://www.geffroy.info/free_software/deb
20 matches
Mail list logo
