On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judica?l Courant wrote:
> Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), camlp4 (>= 3.01)
>
> in the control file of my package.
>
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflicts
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:18, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So I reupload the package _including .orig.tar.gz_ and I received some
> mails like the following, what I have to do?
This won't directly solve your problem, but I strongly suggest running
dinstall -n on your changes file after you upload.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judica?l Courant wrote:
> Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), camlp4 (>= 3.01)
>
> in the control file of my package.
>
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflict
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:18, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So I reupload the package _including .orig.tar.gz_ and I received some
> mails like the following, what I have to do?
This won't directly solve your problem, but I strongly suggest running
dinstall -n on your changes file after you upload.
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`0``BT4,4U97BP"[EMAIL PROTECTED]&0)`<#XA<[EMAIL PR
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor, to become a Debian Developer.
My interests are primarily in i18n and testing; I would like to help
out with debian-i18n, and automated testing of free software.
If possible, I would maintain kde-i18n; I also have some packages
that I would like to package for Debian
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:43:40AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I suggest using a date-based versioning scheme for the .orig.tar.gz,
> > such as configwin_0.9-20020128.orig.tar.gz.
>
> May I change
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:18:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Hi mentors,
> I'm trying to upload a package but seems that is impossible for me to
> do so.
> The problem started when I upload the package and reuploaded it a few
> days after changing the .orig.tar.gz without changing the up
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:43:40AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> I suggest using a date-based versioning scheme for the .orig.tar.gz,
> such as configwin_0.9-20020128.orig.tar.gz.
May I change only the .orig.tar.gz leaving untouched the
debian/changelog?
Tnx for the answers.
Cheers.
--
S
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!
ging the upstream
> version number (sorry, I know that this isn't really clean but the
> upstream performs minor changes in a few hour and doesn't change the
> version number).
I suggest using a date-based versioning scheme for the .orig.tar.gz,
such as configwin_0.9-200
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor, to become a Debian Developer.
My interests are primarily in i18n and testing; I would like to help
out with debian-i18n, and automated testing of free software.
If possible, I would maintain kde-i18n; I also have some packages
that I would like to package for Debia
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:18:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So I reupload the package _including .orig.tar.gz_ and I received some
> mails like the following, what I have to do?
You need to change the upstream version number in some manner that won't
conflict with whatever upstream do n
Hi mentors,
I'm trying to upload a package but seems that is impossible for me to
do so.
The problem started when I upload the package and reuploaded it a few
days after changing the .orig.tar.gz without changing the upstream
version number (sorry, I know that this isn't really clean but the
upst
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflicts: camlp4. I expected that
> just replacing "camlp4 (>= 3.01)" by "camlp4" (as virtual package do not
> have any version number) would make my package ok both for the former
> an
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judicaël Courant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
> (coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
>
> Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
Hi,
The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
(coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
as well as a companion tool of ocaml, named camlp4. Formerly, ocaml and
camlp4
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:43:40AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I suggest using a date-based versioning scheme for the .orig.tar.gz,
> > such as configwin_0.9-20020128.orig.tar.gz.
>
> May I change
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:18:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Hi mentors,
> I'm trying to upload a package but seems that is impossible for me to
> do so.
> The problem started when I upload the package and reuploaded it a few
> days after changing the .orig.tar.gz without changing the u
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:06:38PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> It doesn't. There are absolutely no docs, IIRC.
Doogie promised to document it in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=52351&archive=yes&repeatmerged=yes
Unfortunately, the next maintainer for that package closed it.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:43:40AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> I suggest using a date-based versioning scheme for the .orig.tar.gz,
> such as configwin_0.9-20020128.orig.tar.gz.
May I change only the .orig.tar.gz leaving untouched the
debian/changelog?
Tnx for the answers.
Cheers.
--
S
ging the upstream
> version number (sorry, I know that this isn't really clean but the
> upstream performs minor changes in a few hour and doesn't change the
> version number).
I suggest using a date-based versioning scheme for the .orig.tar.gz,
such as configwin_0.9-200
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:18:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So I reupload the package _including .orig.tar.gz_ and I received some
> mails like the following, what I have to do?
You need to change the upstream version number in some manner that won't
conflict with whatever upstream do
Hi mentors,
I'm trying to upload a package but seems that is impossible for me to
do so.
The problem started when I upload the package and reuploaded it a few
days after changing the .orig.tar.gz without changing the upstream
version number (sorry, I know that this isn't really clean but the
ups
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflicts: camlp4. I expected that
> just replacing "camlp4 (>= 3.01)" by "camlp4" (as virtual package do not
> have any version number) would make my package ok both for the former
> a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judicaël Courant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
> (coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
>
> Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:49:24AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:57:32AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > In *roff, \w'string', where ' is any character, gives you the width of
> > string. groff sees \wait{sec}, assumes you're using the separator "a"
> > and that you're missing the
Hi,
The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
(coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
as well as a companion tool of ocaml, named camlp4. Formerly, ocaml and
camlp
Hi
I got a bug report from an auto builder with a Fortran compiler
error.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:52:20PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: scalapack
> Version: 1.7-3
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of scalapack_1.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:34:53AM +0100, Judicaël Courant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer of the Coq package (a proof assistant for
> higher-order logic). I am not a developper and my sponsor (Ralf Treinen)
> is currently out of reach. Can anybody make a NMU for me? (I have just
> fixed a "s
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:57:32AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 01:12:49PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > Also i have the following :
> >
> > \wait{sec}
> >
> > which is rendered as
> >
> > 168,
> >
> > which makes me think that sec or wait has another meaning for man
> > page
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:06:38PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> It doesn't. There are absolutely no docs, IIRC.
Doogie promised to document it in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=52351&archive=yes&repeatmerged=yes
Unfortunately, the next maintainer for that package closed it.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:49:24AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:57:32AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > In *roff, \w'string', where ' is any character, gives you the width of
> > string. groff sees \wait{sec}, assumes you're using the separator "a"
> > and that you're missing the
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the Coq package (a proof assistant for
higher-order logic). I am not a developper and my sponsor (Ralf Treinen)
is currently out of reach. Can anybody make a NMU for me? (I have just
fixed a "serious" bug).
The needed files are in http://www.lri.fr/~jcourant/02/deb_buil
Hi
I got a bug report from an auto builder with a Fortran compiler
error.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:52:20PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: scalapack
> Version: 1.7-3
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of scalapack_1
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:34:53AM +0100, Judicaël Courant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer of the Coq package (a proof assistant for
> higher-order logic). I am not a developper and my sponsor (Ralf Treinen)
> is currently out of reach. Can anybody make a NMU for me? (I have just
> fixed a "
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:57:32AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 01:12:49PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > Also i have the following :
> >
> > \wait{sec}
> >
> > which is rendered as
> >
> > 168,
> >
> > which makes me think that sec or wait has another meaning for man
> > pag
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`0``BT4,4U97BP"[EMAIL PROTECTED]&0)`<#XA<[EMAIL PRO
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`0``BT4,4U97BP"[EMAIL PROTECTED]&0)`<#XA<[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the Coq package (a proof assistant for
higher-order logic). I am not a developper and my sponsor (Ralf Treinen)
is currently out of reach. Can anybody make a NMU for me? (I have just
fixed a "serious" bug).
The needed files are in http://www.lri.fr/~jcourant/02/deb_bui
40 matches
Mail list logo
