On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:37:33PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> As I understand the perl-policy, all packages that contain perl modules are
> to be named in the form libfoo-bar-perl. I'm working on a program called
> SpamAssassin. While it contains perl modules, its primary purpose is for
> it
I'm packaging gallery, a php photo album. I have a question about where
in /var to put the setup directory.
First, some background info:
The php stuff runs out of /usr/share/gallery, and it stores user data,
album data, and picture data in a user configurable place (defaults to
/var/www/albums).
I'm packaging gallery, a php photo album. I have a question about where
in /var to put the setup directory.
First, some background info:
The php stuff runs out of /usr/share/gallery, and it stores user data,
album data, and picture data in a user configurable place (defaults to
/var/www/albums).
As I understand the perl-policy, all packages that contain perl modules are
to be named in the form libfoo-bar-perl. I'm working on a program called
SpamAssassin. While it contains perl modules, its primary purpose is for
its scripts. Furthermore, it contains one binary written in C, so it can't
As I understand the perl-policy, all packages that contain perl modules are
to be named in the form libfoo-bar-perl. I'm working on a program called
SpamAssassin. While it contains perl modules, its primary purpose is for
its scripts. Furthermore, it contains one binary written in C, so it can'
Check this
out!
A cool new
internet experience!
A great gift idea
for the Holidays!
Go to getfriction.org and get in the
action!
Check this
out!
A cool new
internet experience!
A great gift idea
for the Holidays!
Go to getfriction.org and get in the
action!
Laurent Martelli wrote:
> I've had similar problem with another package. I finally edited the
> prerm scripts so that it did not call update-alternatives and I could
> remove the package. Yes, I know, it is a little blunt :-)
I was thinking about this but I don't know exactly what "an
inconsisten
> "Jérôme" == Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jérôme> Hi, A recent installation of mozilla-browser failed on my
Jérôme> system. It seems that it squashed its own alternative file.
Jérôme> As a consequence, I can: - neither purge the package: dpkg
Jérôme> tells me that the
Laurent Martelli wrote:
> I've had similar problem with another package. I finally edited the
> prerm scripts so that it did not call update-alternatives and I could
> remove the package. Yes, I know, it is a little blunt :-)
I was thinking about this but I don't know exactly what "an
inconsiste
> "Jérôme" == Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jérôme> Hi, A recent installation of mozilla-browser failed on my
Jérôme> system. It seems that it squashed its own alternative file.
Jérôme> As a consequence, I can: - neither purge the package: dpkg
Jérôme> tells me that th
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I'm reduced to guessing: there seem to be a number of packages that
> depend on an exact version of ocaml (i.e. >= x.y, < x.y+1). This means
> that the bulk of this packages have to enter testing all at once --
> otherwise, the not simultanously-up
Hi,
A recent installation of mozilla-browser failed on my system.
It seems that it squashed its own alternative file.
As a consequence, I can:
- neither purge the package: dpkg tells me that the package is
in an unconsistent state, and recommends to reinstall the package.
- neither re
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I'm reduced to guessing: there seem to be a number of packages that
> depend on an exact version of ocaml (i.e. >= x.y, < x.y+1). This means
> that the bulk of this packages have to enter testing all at once --
> otherwise, the not simultanously-u
Hi,
A recent installation of mozilla-browser failed on my system.
It seems that it squashed its own alternative file.
As a consequence, I can:
- neither purge the package: dpkg tells me that the package is
in an unconsistent state, and recommends to reinstall the package.
- neither r
15 matches
Mail list logo
