On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:56:57PM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > Carlos Laviola dijo:
> > > Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs,
> >
> > Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs?
>
> The 'dbs' package :-)
>
> > > Can any
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Carlos Laviola dijo:
> > Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs,
>
> Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs?
The 'dbs' package :-)
> > Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this
> > give me a hand
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:56:57PM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > Carlos Laviola dijo:
> > > Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs,
> >
> > Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs?
>
> The 'dbs' package :-)
>
> > > Can an
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Carlos Laviola dijo:
> > Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs,
>
> Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs?
The 'dbs' package :-)
> > Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this
> > give me a han
Hello,
I am still trying to package mpqc and it's library libsc. The last major
problem is with SO-names for the shared libraries. Upstream didn't use
SO-names yet, but is willing to do now. However, he said:
> The problem is that C++ is not binary compatible across different
> compiler vendors o
As the Tcl/Tk maintainer, I'd prefer you depend on 8.3... now, if it's a
script, then depending on tcl8.3 | tclsh is fine (tclsh is a virtual
package). For linking, though, please use 8.3.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 08:11:15PM +, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> Hi there yal,
>
> If a program I am packi
Carlos Laviola dijo:
> Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs,
Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs?
> Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this
> give me a hand?
What is exactly what you are having trouble with?
Automating? Dealing with CVS stuff?
Hello,
I am still trying to package mpqc and it's library libsc. The last major
problem is with SO-names for the shared libraries. Upstream didn't use
SO-names yet, but is willing to do now. However, he said:
> The problem is that C++ is not binary compatible across different
> compiler vendors
As the Tcl/Tk maintainer, I'd prefer you depend on 8.3... now, if it's a
script, then depending on tcl8.3 | tclsh is fine (tclsh is a virtual
package). For linking, though, please use 8.3.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 08:11:15PM +, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> Hi there yal,
>
> If a program I am pack
Carlos Laviola dijo:
> Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs,
Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs?
> Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this
> give me a hand?
What is exactly what you are having trouble with?
Automating? Dealing with CVS stuff?
Hi there yal,
If a program I am packing depends on tcl/tk8 or newer, which packages should I
get it to depend on, as there being multiple 'tcl8.*/tk8.*'s?
Thanks,
Hereward
Title: 펜티엄4+17"완전평면 모니터가 40만원...
Hi there yal,
If a program I am packing depends on tcl/tk8 or newer, which packages should I
get it to depend on, as there being multiple 'tcl8.*/tk8.*'s?
Thanks,
Hereward
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: ÆæƼ¾ö4+17"¿ÏÀüÆò¸é ¸ð´ÏÅÍ°¡ 40¸¸¿ø...
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:12:58PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:47:28AM +0100, Sven wrote:
>
> > I have a package that i make build-depend on tcl/tk-dev 8.3, but the
> > configure
> > process will check for the tcl/tk presence, and get one if available.
> >
> > It wi
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:53:03AM +0100, Christian Westgaard wrote:
> First I don't know why previous Changelogs has been removed:
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r4/ChangeLog (works fine)
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r3/ChangeLog (does not work)
> ...
It
Hello, ...
I maintain the ocaml package, and am wondering if there is any way to check
why the ocaml package has not entered woody/testing.
It has been build since november 10 on all 8 architectures going to be
released with woody, and there is no bug (apart a very old wishlist bug which
i will g
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:12:58PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:47:28AM +0100, Sven wrote:
>
> > I have a package that i make build-depend on tcl/tk-dev 8.3, but the configure
> > process will check for the tcl/tk presence, and get one if available.
> >
> > It will c
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:53:03AM +0100, Christian Westgaard wrote:
> First I don't know why previous Changelogs has been removed:
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r4/ChangeLog (works fine)
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r3/ChangeLog (does not work)
> ...
I
Hello, ...
I maintain the ocaml package, and am wondering if there is any way to check
why the ocaml package has not entered woody/testing.
It has been build since november 10 on all 8 architectures going to be
released with woody, and there is no bug (apart a very old wishlist bug which
i will
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:36:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Roland Mas
> | A hypothetical third hand would be holding this: the postinst first
> | reads the master config file and shoves its values into Debconf, then
> This is the right way, though. Note that unless the admin has ask
Colin Watson dijo:
> dh_clean(1) says:
>-Xitem --exclude=item
Oh, well, I missed it, it's no good to be all upset and in a hurry :-)
Thanks!
--
Próxima estación, Esperanza. Final de trayecto - Metro de Madrid
Amaya Rodrigo Sastrewww.andago.com Sta Engracia, 54 28010 Madrid
BO
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Using dh_clean (or dh_clean -[d|k]) in my rules file removes some .orig
> files that are legitimate and needed. Changing file names would involve
> changing code, and it's not a wellcome idea ;-)
dh_clean(1) says:
-Xitem --exclude=it
I am experiencing trouble packaging some of the applicactions developed
at work.
Using dh_clean (or dh_clean -[d|k]) in my rules file removes some .orig
files that are legitimate and needed. Changing file names would involve
changing code, and it's not a wellcome idea ;-)
It is also giving troubl
* Roland Mas
| A hypothetical third hand would be holding this: the postinst first
| reads the master config file and shoves its values into Debconf, then
| asks the debconf questions, then updates the sourceforge.conf file
| with the new values from Debconf. It sounds horribly messy, though,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:36:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Roland Mas
> | A hypothetical third hand would be holding this: the postinst first
> | reads the master config file and shoves its values into Debconf, then
> This is the right way, though. Note that unless the admin has as
Colin Watson dijo:
> dh_clean(1) says:
>-Xitem --exclude=item
Oh, well, I missed it, it's no good to be all upset and in a hurry :-)
Thanks!
--
Próxima estación, Esperanza. Final de trayecto - Metro de Madrid
Amaya Rodrigo Sastrewww.andago.com Sta Engracia, 54 28010 Madrid
B
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Using dh_clean (or dh_clean -[d|k]) in my rules file removes some .orig
> files that are legitimate and needed. Changing file names would involve
> changing code, and it's not a wellcome idea ;-)
dh_clean(1) says:
-Xitem --exclude=i
I am experiencing trouble packaging some of the applicactions developed
at work.
Using dh_clean (or dh_clean -[d|k]) in my rules file removes some .orig
files that are legitimate and needed. Changing file names would involve
changing code, and it's not a wellcome idea ;-)
It is also giving troub
2.2 never had xlibs, just xlib6g (libc6 version) and xlib6 (libc5
version)... xlibs is newto woody/sid. I have both xlibs-dev and xlib6g-dev
on my sid machine, and build lotsa packages w/X support, and xlibs is what's
put in my substvars as generated by dpkg-shlibdeps -- xlib6g{,-dev} are just
empt
* Roland Mas
| A hypothetical third hand would be holding this: the postinst first
| reads the master config file and shoves its values into Debconf, then
| asks the debconf questions, then updates the sourceforge.conf file
| with the new values from Debconf. It sounds horribly messy, though,
First I don't know why previous Changelogs has been removed:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r4/ChangeLog (works fine)
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r3/ChangeLog (does not work)
...
One of my package build machines both have:
dpkg -s xlibs
and
dpkg -s xlib6
2.2 never had xlibs, just xlib6g (libc6 version) and xlib6 (libc5
version)... xlibs is newto woody/sid. I have both xlibs-dev and xlib6g-dev
on my sid machine, and build lotsa packages w/X support, and xlibs is what's
put in my substvars as generated by dpkg-shlibdeps -- xlib6g{,-dev} are just
emp
First I don't know why previous Changelogs has been removed:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r4/ChangeLog (works fine)
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian2.2r3/ChangeLog (does not work)
...
One of my package build machines both have:
dpkg -s xlibs
and
dpkg -s xlib
34 matches
Mail list logo
