Thank you Julian for that complete summary. I can't think of any other
questions or scenarios to ask about.
Regards,
--
-- Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011128 16:06]:
> (1) libdb: Shared library packages have the majo
On 29-Nov-2001 peter karlsson wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry:
>
>> looks like every other icon entry:
>
> Exactly. That is why I am confused.
>
Do other icons show up? Do icons work in other wms that support them?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry:
> looks like every other icon entry:
Exactly. That is why I am confused.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:50:11AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have seen packages change their package names to include a version
> number. Reading the policy, there is little guidance on this subject.
> It would seem that's what Epochs are designed for. However I am aware
> there
I'm the maintainer of the libming packages.
Libming has Python bindings, so i made a package python2-ming.
The Python policy has changed now, and Python 2.1 is now the default
python, so it might be good to rename my package to python-ming?
This is a binary package, the source package remains libm
On 28-Nov-2001 peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to add icons to the menu entries for the Siag suite, but I
> am having problems getting the icons to be recognized. I have this in
> the menu file:
>
> ?package(xsiag): needs="X11" section="Apps/Math" \
> title="Siag" longtitle="Siag O
Hi!
I am trying to add icons to the menu entries for the Siag suite, but I
am having problems getting the icons to be recognized. I have this in
the menu file:
?package(xsiag): needs="X11" section="Apps/Math" \
title="Siag" longtitle="Siag Office Scheme-in-a-Grid" \
command="/usr/bin/siag" ic
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:50:11AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have seen packages change their package names to include a version
> number. Reading the policy, there is little guidance on this subject.
> It would seem that's what Epochs are designed for. However I am aware
> ther
I'm the maintainer of the libming packages.
Libming has Python bindings, so i made a package python2-ming.
The Python policy has changed now, and Python 2.1 is now the default
python, so it might be good to rename my package to python-ming?
This is a binary package, the source package remains lib
On 28-Nov-2001 peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to add icons to the menu entries for the Siag suite, but I
> am having problems getting the icons to be recognized. I have this in
> the menu file:
>
> ?package(xsiag): needs="X11" section="Apps/Math" \
> title="Siag" longtitle="Siag
Hi!
I am trying to add icons to the menu entries for the Siag suite, but I
am having problems getting the icons to be recognized. I have this in
the menu file:
?package(xsiag): needs="X11" section="Apps/Math" \
title="Siag" longtitle="Siag Office Scheme-in-a-Grid" \
command="/usr/bin/siag" i
Hello,
I have seen packages change their package names to include a version
number. Reading the policy, there is little guidance on this subject.
It would seem that's what Epochs are designed for. However I am aware
there could be reasons for wanting to change the package name. One
reason mig
Hello,
I have seen packages change their package names to include a version
number. Reading the policy, there is little guidance on this subject.
It would seem that's what Epochs are designed for. However I am aware
there could be reasons for wanting to change the package name. One
reason mi
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28-Nov-2001 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I adopted a package, koth, and wanted to change its build process.
> > For that I needed to change its orig.tar.gz, now dinstall is
> > rejecting to overwrite it, I'd like to kno
On 28-Nov-2001 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I adopted a package, koth, and wanted to change its build process.
> For that I needed to change its orig.tar.gz, now dinstall is
> rejecting to overwrite it, I'd like to know what I need to do,
> upstream is not releasing anything for
Hello all,
I adopted a package, koth, and wanted to change its build process.
For that I needed to change its orig.tar.gz, now dinstall is
rejecting to overwrite it, I'd like to know what I need to do,
upstream is not releasing anything for now...
btw, the modifications I did were untarring
koth
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:46:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Never build a full release from the cvs work directory. Always cvs export
> > to
> > another directory first.
> >
> > Doing test builds from the cvs work dir is fine. But do final releases
> > from a
> > temp di
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28-Nov-2001 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I adopted a package, koth, and wanted to change its build process.
> > For that I needed to change its orig.tar.gz, now dinstall is
> > rejecting to overwrite it, I'd like to kn
On 28-Nov-2001 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I adopted a package, koth, and wanted to change its build process.
> For that I needed to change its orig.tar.gz, now dinstall is
> rejecting to overwrite it, I'd like to know what I need to do,
> upstream is not releasing anything for
Hello all,
I adopted a package, koth, and wanted to change its build process.
For that I needed to change its orig.tar.gz, now dinstall is
rejecting to overwrite it, I'd like to know what I need to do,
upstream is not releasing anything for now...
btw, the modifications I did were untarring
kot
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:46:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Never build a full release from the cvs work directory. Always cvs export to
> > another directory first.
> >
> > Doing test builds from the cvs work dir is fine. But do final releases from a
> > temp dir. Somet
Title: Untitled Document
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> I just adopted a package which is nothing but a Perl script. Previous
> maitainer built it using
>
> Architecture: any
>
> when it had to be
>
> Architecture: all
>
> (correct me if I'm wrong)
>
> Now that I'm uploading a new version of
Hi,
I just adopted a package which is nothing but a Perl script. Previous
maitainer built it using
Architecture: any
when it had to be
Architecture: all
(correct me if I'm wrong)
Now that I'm uploading a new version of package with correct Architecture,
should I ask
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> I just adopted a package which is nothing but a Perl script. Previous
> maitainer built it using
>
> Architecture: any
>
> when it had to be
>
> Architecture: all
>
> (correct me if I'm wrong)
>
> Now that I'm uploading a new version o
Hi,
I just adopted a package which is nothing but a Perl script. Previous
maitainer built it using
Architecture: any
when it had to be
Architecture: all
(correct me if I'm wrong)
Now that I'm uploading a new version of package with correct Architecture, should I
ask
26 matches
Mail list logo