On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:24, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Today, Yven Johannes Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way I'm of course not really of the opinion that sourceforge
> > "sucks"; one really has to admit that valinux does an incredible job
> > for the open source commity, hosting I think m
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:46:16PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Also: since gql-drivers is no longer needed, I want to get it off the
> > archive. Is the correct way to file a bug against non-us.debian.org
> > (where gql-drivers resides)?
>
> usually it is ftp.d.o, but in this case non-us
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Gundolf Kiefer wrote:
>
> I have written a piece of software that I would like to offer for inclusion
> into a future release of Debian
>
> I am not a Debian developer,
>
> How can I proceed further?
one of two ways: you can apply to become a debian dev
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:24, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Today, Yven Johannes Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way I'm of course not really of the opinion that sourceforge
> > "sucks"; one really has to admit that valinux does an incredible job
> > for the open source commity, hosting I think
>
> Now there are some open bugs against gql-drivers, which I want to
> close with the upload of the new gql package. Should I reassign them
> to gql and close them from the changelog? (I guess so)
>
looks like you have never had someone accidently close a bug of yours (-:
Just close the bug as
Hi folks!
I had a 'logical' software package consisting of two physical source
packages. Now I have merged them into one source pkg, named after one
of the original source pkgs.
So, concretly, 'gql' and 'gql-drivers' are becoming 'gql' (with gql
containing gql-drivers, of course).
Now there are
Today, Yven Johannes Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way I'm of course not really of the opinion that sourceforge
> "sucks"; one really has to admit that valinux does an incredible job
> for the open source commity, hosting I think more than 16000 projects
> on their servers, which sort o
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:46:16PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Also: since gql-drivers is no longer needed, I want to get it off the
> > archive. Is the correct way to file a bug against non-us.debian.org
> > (where gql-drivers resides)?
>
> usually it is ftp.d.o, but in this case non-u
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Gundolf Kiefer wrote:
>
> I have written a piece of software that I would like to offer for inclusion
> into a future release of Debian
>
> I am not a Debian developer,
>
> How can I proceed further?
one of two ways: you can apply to become a debian de
>
> Now there are some open bugs against gql-drivers, which I want to
> close with the upload of the new gql package. Should I reassign them
> to gql and close them from the changelog? (I guess so)
>
looks like you have never had someone accidently close a bug of yours (-:
Just close the bug a
Hi folks!
I had a 'logical' software package consisting of two physical source
packages. Now I have merged them into one source pkg, named after one
of the original source pkgs.
So, concretly, 'gql' and 'gql-drivers' are becoming 'gql' (with gql
containing gql-drivers, of course).
Now there are
Today, Yven Johannes Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way I'm of course not really of the opinion that sourceforge
> "sucks"; one really has to admit that valinux does an incredible job
> for the open source commity, hosting I think more than 16000 projects
> on their servers, which sort
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 13:47:04 +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> > replace them by the file to
Hi Eduard!
On 04-Nov-2001 Eduard Bloch wrote:
>#include
> Florian Hinzmann wrote on Sun Nov 04, 2001 um 08:18:47PM:
>
>> I can't do a configure run as there is no configure script!
>> I do have to run the autotools scripts.
>>
>> The question is when to run it. Before or after the Debian
>> di
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 13:47:04 +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> > replace them by the file to
Hello!
On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> replace them by the file to which they are linked.
Yes, thanks. I do understand another part of this autoco
On Monday 12 November 2001 09:59, Roland Mas wrote:
> Yven Johannes Leist (2001-11-10 18:22:26 +0100) :
> > On Saturday 10 November 2001 18:13, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
> >> das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft
> >> langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-
Dear friends,
I have written a piece of software that I would like to offer for inclusion
into a future release of Debian (it is a lightweight, non-intrusive backup
tool targeting standalone/home computers that combines some properties I could
not find in previously existing tools that way).
I am
Hi Eduard!
On 04-Nov-2001 Eduard Bloch wrote:
>#include
> Florian Hinzmann wrote on Sun Nov 04, 2001 um 08:18:47PM:
>
>> I can't do a configure run as there is no configure script!
>> I do have to run the autotools scripts.
>>
>> The question is when to run it. Before or after the Debian
>> d
Hello!
On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> replace them by the file to which they are linked.
Yes, thanks. I do understand another part of this autoc
On Monday 12 November 2001 09:59, Roland Mas wrote:
> Yven Johannes Leist (2001-11-10 18:22:26 +0100) :
> > On Saturday 10 November 2001 18:13, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
> >> das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft
> >> langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :
Dear friends,
I have written a piece of software that I would like to offer for inclusion
into a future release of Debian (it is a lightweight, non-intrusive backup
tool targeting standalone/home computers that combines some properties I could
not find in previously existing tools that way).
I a
Yven Johannes Leist (2001-11-10 18:22:26 +0100) :
> On Saturday 10 November 2001 18:13, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
>> das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft
>> langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-((
> sorry for the inconvenience, this message was not sup
Sorry if that's an FAQ. I searched some on archives and didn't find what I
wanted. The next release of ICU may have a library
/usr/lib/libicudt20l.so
which is not recognized by dh_makeshlibs because it has the wrong naming
convention. As a result lintian complains my package contains
Yven Johannes Leist (2001-11-10 18:22:26 +0100) :
> On Saturday 10 November 2001 18:13, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
>> das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft
>> langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-((
> sorry for the inconvenience, this message was not su
Sorry if that's an FAQ. I searched some on archives and didn't find what I
wanted. The next release of ICU may have a library
/usr/lib/libicudt20l.so
which is not recognized by dh_makeshlibs because it has the wrong naming
convention. As a result lintian complains my package contain
26 matches
Mail list logo
