Hi,
I packaged liba52 and libmpeg2 a while ago. They've been sitting at
http://gstreamer.net/releases/debian/ (along with gstreamer debs too).
I'm still in limbo in the new maintainer queue and figure I should ITP
this stuff, update it, and get it in the archives.
I'm unsure what to do about the
Hi,
I packaged liba52 and libmpeg2 a while ago. They've been sitting at
http://gstreamer.net/releases/debian/ (along with gstreamer debs too).
I'm still in limbo in the new maintainer queue and figure I should ITP
this stuff, update it, and get it in the archives.
I'm unsure what to do about th
>>
>> what does "kderemove" do? I have never seen this, nor is it in Debian menu
>> policy.
>
> IIRC it's some magic KDE menu-method thingie that Ivan only recently
> proposed it to be added to policy.
>
at my prodding. Once it is official lintian will support it.
-
We have buried the put
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:26:00AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Now running lintian...
> > W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
> > /usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
> > Finished running lintian.
> >
> > How can I correct this ?
>
> what does "kderemove" do? I have never seen this, n
>>
>> what does "kderemove" do? I have never seen this, nor is it in Debian menu
>> policy.
>
> IIRC it's some magic KDE menu-method thingie that Ivan only recently
> proposed it to be added to policy.
>
at my prodding. Once it is official lintian will support it.
-
We have buried the pu
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:26:00AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Now running lintian...
> > W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
> > /usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
> > Finished running lintian.
> >
> > How can I correct this ?
>
> what does "kderemove" do? I have never seen this,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:30:28AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> No, there's nothing wrong with that, but please consider carefully if the
> dependency is worth it, as it will mean bringing a little-used language
> support into all systems that need your package.
>
> You just need a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:30:28AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> No, there's nothing wrong with that, but please consider carefully if the
> dependency is worth it, as it will mean bringing a little-used language
> support into all systems that need your package.
>
> You just need a
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> 1) Does Debian have any useful packaging utilities used for simple
>programmatic editing of text files? I'm not thinking sed/awk/perl
I think not. The code is there, but scattered over a thousand packages and
in different incarnations as every main
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> 1) Does Debian have any useful packaging utilities used for simple
>programmatic editing of text files? I'm not thinking sed/awk/perl
I think not. The code is there, but scattered over a thousand packages and
in different incarnations as every mai
10 matches
Mail list logo
