> Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
> contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
>
> However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
> For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
>
> http://2
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
http://24.31.107.28/~lex
Hi,
I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for cvs.
The subversion server needs the Berkeley Database version 3.3.11, the
current version in unstable is 3.2.9. I've build 3.3.11-1 based on
patches in the BTS (#109853).
The differences betwene 3.2.x and 3.3.x require a reco
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> I think that would be appropriate.
Colin> Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin> Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Colin> particular, when sponsoring a package, which fie
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:40:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
> > repeated assertion. :)
>
> Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
> dp
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
http://24.31.107.28/~le
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
> repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg developers (Wichert, Adam etc) intended with the new field?
Hamish
--
Hi,
I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for cvs.
The subversion server needs the Berkeley Database version 3.3.11, the
current version in unstable is 3.2.9. I've build 3.3.11-1 based on
patches in the BTS (#109853).
The differences betwene 3.2.x and 3.3.x require a rec
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> I think that would be appropriate.
Colin> Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin> Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Colin> particular, when sponsoring a package, which fi
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:40:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
> > repeated assertion. :)
>
> Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
> d
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
> repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg developers (Wichert, Adam etc) intended with the new field?
Hamish
--
> I think that's Maintainer: in the control file (and the .dsc). It makes
> sense to me that the maintainer of a .dsc is the person primarily
> responsible for the package, while the maintainer of a .changes is the
> person responsible for uploading this particular build. This also
The Maintainer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> spake forth:
> > > I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
> > > .changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
> >
> > I think that's
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake forth:
> > eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
> > or debuild?
> >
> > I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
> > .changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
>
>
Hi!
I have created a package of the LysKOM server (ITP bug #114231). Since this
is the first server I have packaged, I would appreciate if someone would
test and see that it works well on other systems than my own... :)
The package can be found at http://www.softwolves.pp.se/deb/
It only has one
> I think that's Maintainer: in the control file (and the .dsc). It makes
> sense to me that the maintainer of a .dsc is the person primarily
> responsible for the package, while the maintainer of a .changes is the
> person responsible for uploading this particular build. This also
The Maintainer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake
>forth:
> > > I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
> > > .changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
> >
> > I think that's
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
> architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=htdig&ver=3.1.5-3&arch=hppa&stamp=100
> 2598209&file=log&as=raw
>
>
> My question is pretty simple;
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake
forth:
> > eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
> > or debuild?
> >
> > I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
> > .changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
>
>
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:26:10 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package?
>>
>> Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on
>> install. I now delete it aft
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
> eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
> or debuild?
>
> I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
> .changes file as a result. Th
Hi!
I have created a package of the LysKOM server (ITP bug #114231). Since this
is the first server I have packaged, I would appreciate if someone would
test and see that it works well on other systems than my own... :)
The package can be found at http://www.softwolves.pp.se/deb/
It only has on
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:25, Stijn de Bekker wrote:
> I've just taken over the htdig package and now I'm going through the
> outstanding bugs. My question relates to bugs #74523 and #104607.
>
>
> The htdig package uses an english wordlist which is now located in
> /etc/htdig/ - just a list of english
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
> architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=htdig&ver=3.1.5-3&arch=hppa&stamp=100
> 2598209&file=log&as=raw
>
>
> My question is pretty simple;
Try -e...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake forth:
> Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
> eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
> or debuild?
>
> I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:26:10 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package?
>>
>> Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on
>> install. I now delete it af
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
> eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
> or debuild?
>
> I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
> .changes file as a result. T
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:25, Stijn de Bekker wrote:
> I've just taken over the htdig package and now I'm going through the
> outstanding bugs. My question relates to bugs #74523 and #104607.
>
>
> The htdig package uses an english wordlist which is now located in
> /etc/htdig/ - just a list of englis
Try -e...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake
forth:
> Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
> eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
> or debuild?
>
> I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
>
> Geoff,
>
[snip]
>
> Your debian/copyright file should say where you obta
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -m"Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=htdig&ver=3.1.5-3&arch=hppa&stamp=1002598209&file=log&as=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I create a chroot environment on
sarti (
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
>
> Geoff,
>
> I don't know anything about rockets but I was intrigued.
> Your
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
>
> Geoff,
>
[snip]
>
> Your debian/copyright file should say where you obt
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=htdig&ver=3.1.5-3&arch=hppa&stamp=1002598209&file=log&as=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I create a chroot environment on
sarti
36 matches
Mail list logo
