RE: dpkg-shlibdeps strange messages and lintian error (rpath)

2001-09-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > second, i get the lintian warning: > W: modlogan: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/modlogan > /usr/lib/modlogan > rpath encodes the entire path to a lib in the binary. This would prevent it from being used on a system which had the lib somewhere else.

RE: dpkg-shlibdeps strange messages and lintian error (rpath)

2001-09-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > second, i get the lintian warning: > W: modlogan: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/modlogan > /usr/lib/modlogan > rpath encodes the entire path to a lib in the binary. This would prevent it from being used on a system which had the lib somewhere else. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

dpkg-shlibdeps strange messages and lintian error (rpath)

2001-09-16 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, first, dpkg-shlibdeps checks a few shared objects files which resides in the packages own subdir in /usr/lib, since they are just some sort of plugins, but shlibdeps complains: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of libmla_mdata_netmask.so not recognized and this without about a dozen of files. w

Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.

2001-09-16 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
[cc and reply-to more appropriate list] Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: [doc-html-w3] > > That package is in non-free. IIRC the issue is that you can't modify > > the standards. Which is somewhat understandable, but s

Re: testing delays

2001-09-16 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The last xstr upload being some 2+ weeks ago, perhaps the build log > > has expired? No bug report ... maybe it fell through the cracks? > sorry, but what does this sentence mean? If something is compiled successfully, it is uploaded the next day

Re: cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Martin Butterweck
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:11:24PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote: > > (taken from debian/rules) > > --- > > clean: > > rm -f eroaster Makefile configure.cache configure.log > > configure.status constants.py ecat.py > You wrote configure.status and configure.cache where the files are > config.st

Re: cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Martin Butterweck wrote: > hi, > lintian gives me the following errormessage: > --- > mb:~/debian$lintian -i eroaster_2.0.11-1.dsc > E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.status > N: > N: Leaving config.cache/status causes autobuild

Re: cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Baruch Even
* Martin Butterweck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010916 20:56]: > hi, > lintian gives me the following errormessage: > --- > mb:~/debian$lintian -i eroaster_2.0.11-1.dsc > E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.status > E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cach

dpkg-shlibdeps strange messages and lintian error (rpath)

2001-09-16 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, first, dpkg-shlibdeps checks a few shared objects files which resides in the packages own subdir in /usr/lib, since they are just some sort of plugins, but shlibdeps complains: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of libmla_mdata_netmask.so not recognized and this without about a dozen of files.

Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.

2001-09-16 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
[cc and reply-to more appropriate list] Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: [doc-html-w3] > > That package is in non-free. IIRC the issue is that you can't modify > > the standards. Which is somewhat understandable, but

Re: testing delays

2001-09-16 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The last xstr upload being some 2+ weeks ago, perhaps the build log > > has expired? No bug report ... maybe it fell through the cracks? > sorry, but what does this sentence mean? If something is compiled successfully, it is uploaded the next da

cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Martin Butterweck
hi, lintian gives me the following errormessage: --- mb:~/debian$lintian -i eroaster_2.0.11-1.dsc E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.status N: N: Leaving config.cache/status causes autobuilders problems config.cache N: and config.status are produced by GNU autoconf's c

Re: cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Martin Butterweck
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:11:24PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote: > > (taken from debian/rules) > > --- > > clean: > > rm -f eroaster Makefile configure.cache configure.log > > configure.status constants.py ecat.py > You wrote configure.status and configure.cache where the files are > config.s

Re: cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Martin Butterweck wrote: > hi, > lintian gives me the following errormessage: > --- > mb:~/debian$lintian -i eroaster_2.0.11-1.dsc > E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.status > N: > N: Leaving config.cache/status causes autobuil

Re: cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Baruch Even
* Martin Butterweck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010916 20:56]: > hi, > lintian gives me the following errormessage: > --- > mb:~/debian$lintian -i eroaster_2.0.11-1.dsc > E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.status > E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cac

cleanrule of my package

2001-09-16 Thread Martin Butterweck
hi, lintian gives me the following errormessage: --- mb:~/debian$lintian -i eroaster_2.0.11-1.dsc E: eroaster source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.status N: N: Leaving config.cache/status causes autobuilders problems config.cache N: and config.status are produced by GNU autoconf's

Re: orig.tar.gz problems

2001-09-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010916 09:12]: > > with a diff against the orig.tar.gz. Can I somehow re-upload the > > orig.tar.gz for x.y when uploading x.y-2? > > No, unless the orig.tar.gz of the -1 version has been deleted for > some reason,

Re: orig.tar.gz problems

2001-09-16 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote: > An NMU upload for a package that I am adopting was uplodad as if it was > a Debian native package, with a name-x.y-1.1.tar.gz with the sources, I hate when people do that... > with a diff against the orig.tar.gz. Can I somehow re-upload the > orig.tar

Re: orig.tar.gz problems

2001-09-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010916 09:12]: > > with a diff against the orig.tar.gz. Can I somehow re-upload the > > orig.tar.gz for x.y when uploading x.y-2? > > No, unless the orig.tar.gz of the -1 version has been deleted for > some reason,

orig.tar.gz problems

2001-09-16 Thread peter karlsson
Hi! An NMU upload for a package that I am adopting was uplodad as if it was a Debian native package, with a name-x.y-1.1.tar.gz with the sources, with no diffs or orig.tar.gz. I wish to upload a new version, correct with a diff against the orig.tar.gz. Can I somehow re-upload the orig.tar.gz for x

Re: orig.tar.gz problems

2001-09-16 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote: > An NMU upload for a package that I am adopting was uplodad as if it was > a Debian native package, with a name-x.y-1.1.tar.gz with the sources, I hate when people do that... > with a diff against the orig.tar.gz. Can I somehow re-upload the > orig.ta

orig.tar.gz problems

2001-09-16 Thread peter karlsson
Hi! An NMU upload for a package that I am adopting was uplodad as if it was a Debian native package, with a name-x.y-1.1.tar.gz with the sources, with no diffs or orig.tar.gz. I wish to upload a new version, correct with a diff against the orig.tar.gz. Can I somehow re-upload the orig.tar.gz for