Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.

2001-09-15 Thread Richard Atterer
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My guess is that all docs can be part of `main' and can be > > distributed on cd-rom with appropriate copyright notice. > > That package is in non-free. IIRC the issue is th

Re: testing delays

2001-09-15 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:20:26PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > What does this mean? I guess that the autobuilder haven't yet try the > > building on sparc architecture, but I'm not sure. > The last xstr upload being some 2+ weeks ago, perhaps the build log > has expired? No bug report ... m

Re: alpha version numbering

2001-09-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:16:23PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote: > [Please CC me, as I'm not on the list.] > > I'd like to package an alpha release of Tux of Math Command[1]. > The upstream version number is 2001.09.07-0102. I believe that > upstream will eventually move to the x.y.z numbering scheme.

Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.

2001-09-15 Thread Richard Atterer
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My guess is that all docs can be part of `main' and can be > > distributed on cd-rom with appropriate copyright notice. > > That package is in non-free. IIRC the issue is t

Re: testing delays

2001-09-15 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:20:26PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > What does this mean? I guess that the autobuilder haven't yet try the > > building on sparc architecture, but I'm not sure. > The last xstr upload being some 2+ weeks ago, perhaps the build log > has expired? No bug report ...

Re: alpha version numbering

2001-09-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:16:23PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote: > [Please CC me, as I'm not on the list.] > > I'd like to package an alpha release of Tux of Math Command[1]. > The upstream version number is 2001.09.07-0102. I believe that > upstream will eventually move to the x.y.z numbering scheme

Re: GPG key

2001-09-15 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
(you would probably get more competent advice on a gpg-related list) Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The question is: why does "-v -v -v -v --with-colons" display > such enormous amount of duplicated entries? The thing is that you are listing three versions of this key (every pub: l

Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.

2001-09-15 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In order to package HTML 4.01 specification from www.w3c.org Please have a look at doc-html-w3. Maybe you should even take it over, the current maintainer is missing-in-action. > My guess is that all docs can be part of `main' and can be >

Re: GPG key

2001-09-15 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
(you would probably get more competent advice on a gpg-related list) Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The question is: why does "-v -v -v -v --with-colons" display > such enormous amount of duplicated entries? The thing is that you are listing three versions of this key (every pub:

Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.

2001-09-15 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In order to package HTML 4.01 specification from www.w3c.org Please have a look at doc-html-w3. Maybe you should even take it over, the current maintainer is missing-in-action. > My guess is that all docs can be part of `main' and can be >