Wine's current numbering scheme is 0.0.20010824-1, where 20010824 is the
upstream release
date, and -1 is the debian revision number. As far as I know, if wine ever
changes over to a
major.minor versioning scheme, this should be a seamless transition without the
need for
epochs.
--
___ _
[Please CC me, as I'm not on the list.]
Howdy,
I'd like to package an alpha release of Tux of Math Command[1].
The upstream version number is 2001.09.07-0102. I believe that
upstream will eventually move to the x.y.z numbering scheme.
How can I number the Debian package so that I don't need to
Wine's current numbering scheme is 0.0.20010824-1, where 20010824 is the upstream
release
date, and -1 is the debian revision number. As far as I know, if wine ever changes
over to a
major.minor versioning scheme, this should be a seamless transition without the need
for
epochs.
--
___
[Please CC me, as I'm not on the list.]
Howdy,
I'd like to package an alpha release of Tux of Math Command[1].
The upstream version number is 2001.09.07-0102. I believe that
upstream will eventually move to the x.y.z numbering scheme.
How can I number the Debian package so that I don't need to
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:11:52PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:53:26PM +0100, Nick Phillips wrote:
>
> > I wonder whether anyone can point me at a likely cause for a slightly
> > worrying list of messages I'm getting from dpkg-source when using
> > dpkg-buildpackage
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:11:52PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:53:26PM +0100, Nick Phillips wrote:
>
> > I wonder whether anyone can point me at a likely cause for a slightly
> > worrying list of messages I'm getting from dpkg-source when using
> > dpkg-buildpackage
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > This is an output of:
> > gpg -v -v -v -v --with-colons --list-keys porridge
> >
> > Does anyone understand anything of this mess and can provide me
> > with some clues on how to read it? I could not find any help in
> > gnupg do
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > This is an output of:
> > gpg -v -v -v -v --with-colons --list-keys porridge
> >
> > Does anyone understand anything of this mess and can provide me
> > with some clues on how to read it? I could not find any help in
> > gnupg d
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:15:27PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> I uploaded 'gpw' under unstable 20 days ago.
> Currently status is for m68k as follows:
>
> http://m68k.debian.org/cgi/build-info.pl?pkg=gpw
>
> gpw:
> Package : gpw
> Version : 0.0.19940601-3
> This is an output of:
> gpg -v -v -v -v --with-colons --list-keys porridge
>
> Does anyone understand anything of this mess and can provide me
> with some clues on how to read it? I could not find any help in
> gnupg documentation.
Why use it then? ;) -veryveryveryverbose ;)
> (Hint: anything
Hi!
This is an output of:
gpg -v -v -v -v --with-colons --list-keys porridge
Does anyone understand anything of this mess and can provide me
with some clues on how to read it? I could not find any help in
gnupg documentation.
(Hint: anything that has "Marcin Owsiany" in it is me,
everything else
In order to package HTML 4.01 specification from www.w3c.org I'd like
to have comments about section and
See
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-2620.html
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents.html
My guess is that all docs can be part of `main' and can be
distribu
I uploaded 'gpw' under unstable 20 days ago.
Currently status is for m68k as follows:
http://m68k.debian.org/cgi/build-info.pl?pkg=gpw
gpw:
Package : gpw
Version : 0.0.19940601-3
Builder : buildd3
State : Building
Section :
Debian Sleuthing (part XIV)
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Following the link on the word "sparc", I read the following:
>
>Database information:
>
>Most recent build log:
>
>Not available.
>
> What does this mean? I guess that the autobuilder haven't yet try the
> This is an output of:
> gpg -v -v -v -v --with-colons --list-keys porridge
>
> Does anyone understand anything of this mess and can provide me
> with some clues on how to read it? I could not find any help in
> gnupg documentation.
Why use it then? ;) -veryveryveryverbose ;)
> (Hint: anythin
Hi!
This is an output of:
gpg -v -v -v -v --with-colons --list-keys porridge
Does anyone understand anything of this mess and can provide me
with some clues on how to read it? I could not find any help in
gnupg documentation.
(Hint: anything that has "Marcin Owsiany" in it is me,
everything els
In order to package HTML 4.01 specification from www.w3c.org I'd like
to have comments about section and
See
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-2620.html
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents.html
My guess is that all docs can be part of `main' and can be
distrib
I uploaded 'gpw' under unstable 20 days ago.
Currently status is for m68k as follows:
http://m68k.debian.org/cgi/build-info.pl?pkg=gpw
gpw:
Package : gpw
Version : 0.0.19940601-3
Builder : buildd3
State : Building
Section :
Debian Sleuthing (part XIV)
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Following the link on the word "sparc", I read the following:
>
>Database information:
>
>Most recent build log:
>
>Not available.
>
> What does this mean? I guess that the autobuilder haven't yet try th
Hi
El 13 Sep 2001 a las 04:47PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson escribio:
> Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]:
> > I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why
> > somebody overtakes others?
>
> The delay for some people (and esp. the lack of
I would appreciate if someone would sponsor this package:
Package: sml-mode
Architecture: all
Depends: emacs20 | emacsen, debconf
Description: A major Emacs mode for editing Standard ML.
It provides syntax highlighting and automatic indentation and
comes with sml-proc which allows interaction w
Hi
El 13 Sep 2001 a las 04:47PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson escribio:
> Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]:
> > I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why
> > somebody overtakes others?
>
> The delay for some people (and esp. the lack of
I would appreciate if someone would sponsor this package:
Package: sml-mode
Architecture: all
Depends: emacs20 | emacsen, debconf
Description: A major Emacs mode for editing Standard ML.
It provides syntax highlighting and automatic indentation and
comes with sml-proc which allows interaction
Hi all
El 13 Sep 2001 a las 06:40PM +0200, Gergely Nagy escribio:
> Because the DAM processess people in the order he likes, it is
> entirely up to him. It is not documented anywhere that people will be
> processed in any order, and I think that's good.
>
> Just be patient, and wait, as most of t
24 matches
Mail list logo
