On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:40:22PM +0200, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> 3. I build the documentation from the sources. This requires
> Java, and as this is a somewhat tricky dependency, this
> solution was given up some time ago.
This is the best solution. What DTD does it use?
DocBook/LinuxDoc/DebianDo
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:00:20PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> >
> > > So how to deal with this?
> >
> > In pram, check to see if an attempt is being made to downgrade to an
> > old version which used the old format. If it is, scream like a banshee
> > then exit 1, with a note to the effect that
Hi,
I've made a little Memory Leak Traker and I'd like
to package it for debian.
Here is a description of files:
libmdb.so.0.1--> The library that redefine malloc, free, .
gdb_pilot --> A binary used by the library.
I try to make the package using Debian New Maintai
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:40:22PM +0200, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> 3. I build the documentation from the sources. This requires
> Java, and as this is a somewhat tricky dependency, this
> solution was given up some time ago.
This is the best solution. What DTD does it use?
DocBook/LinuxDoc/DebianD
I've applied a few days ago as debian developer and currently waiting
for being assigned an AM ;) so my answer is just my opinion, not based
on much experience ;)
> 1. I keep up the distinction between the two tarballs. This has
> the disadvantage that I have two write two rules files etc. and
> y
Hi,
Marco Kuhlmann writes:
> Mozart upstream offers two tarballs: One containing the
> complete sources, including sgml sources for the documentation,
> and one convenience tarball containing a precompiled
> html-version of the documentation.
I would suggest that you keep the distinction and mak
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:00:20PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> >
> > > So how to deal with this?
> >
> > In pram, check to see if an attempt is being made to downgrade to an
> > old version which used the old format. If it is, scream like a banshee
> > then exit 1, with a note to the effect that
Hi,
I've made a little Memory Leak Traker and I'd like
to package it for debian.
Here is a description of files:
libmdb.so.0.1--> The library that redefine malloc, free, .
gdb_pilot --> A binary used by the library.
I try to make the package using Debian New Mainta
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:46:32PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:44:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm packaging Bugzilla but at now I don't know how to
> > make downgrade possible.
>
> Why are you even trying? Downgrading is not officially supported in
> Deb
Hi folks!
I am just preparing a new Debian release of the Mozart package,
which I took over from Ralf Treinen, and have a little question
concerning the organisation of the package.
Mozart upstream offers two tarballs: One containing the
complete sources, including sgml sources for the docume
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:14:13AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to upload two architectures at once, and include
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:44:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm packaging Bugzilla but at now I don't know how to
> make downgrade possible.
Why are you even trying? Downgrading is not officially supported in
Debian, there is no reason to allow individual packages to be
downgraded if doin
I've applied a few days ago as debian developer and currently waiting
for being assigned an AM ;) so my answer is just my opinion, not based
on much experience ;)
> 1. I keep up the distinction between the two tarballs. This has
> the disadvantage that I have two write two rules files etc. and
>
Hi,
Marco Kuhlmann writes:
> Mozart upstream offers two tarballs: One containing the
> complete sources, including sgml sources for the documentation,
> and one convenience tarball containing a precompiled
> html-version of the documentation.
I would suggest that you keep the distinction and ma
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:46:32PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:44:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm packaging Bugzilla but at now I don't know how to
> > make downgrade possible.
>
> Why are you even trying? Downgrading is not officially supported in
> De
Hi folks!
I am just preparing a new Debian release of the Mozart package,
which I took over from Ralf Treinen, and have a little question
concerning the organisation of the package.
Mozart upstream offers two tarballs: One containing the
complete sources, including sgml sources for the docum
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:14:13AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to upload two architectures at once, and include
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:44:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm packaging Bugzilla but at now I don't know how to
> make downgrade possible.
Why are you even trying? Downgrading is not officially supported in
Debian, there is no reason to allow individual packages to be
downgraded if doi
18 matches
Mail list logo
